Pages

11/10/25

ANGRY MIKE: HOW QUICKLY CAN TEAMS REBUILD DEPTH IN THEIR FARM SYSTEM AFTER MULTIPLE HIGH-PROFILE TRADES?


ANGRY MIKE 






The Mets have the #1 Farm System in the MLB because they ascertained a success rate with draft selections over the last 4 drafts that has never been duplicated in franchise history. Their streak of successful draft classes started with the 2022 MLB Draft, and despite whiffing on 1st Round pick, Kevin Parada and his franchise record $5 Million signing bonus, the Mets were able to acquire several impact players with their early round selections, and with their selections in the later rounds.


2022 Draft Class:


        Name                    Round 

Jett Williams                1st 
Blade Tidwell                2nd 
Nick Morabito               2nd 
Jacob Reimer               4th 
Jonah Tong                 7th
  Dylan Ross                  13th 


Their 2023 Draft Class was arguably as successful, as 2022, as the Mets turn their attention to college starting pitchers in the early rounds, sandwiched between 2 premium high school talents in Colin Houck and A.J. Ewing. The Mets continued to fortify organizational depth in key areas of need with tactical precision. 





2023 Draft Class:


Name                             Round 

Colin Houck                      1st 
Brandon Sproat                2nd 
Nolan McLean                   3rd 
Zach Thornton                  5th 
A.J. Ewing                        7th
Brett Banks                      11th


Being able to add future R.O.Y candidates in Tong and McLean, potential “ACE” talents in back to back drafts is as rare as it gets, even when teams use 1st round selections and $10 million in bonuses. Adding those type of elite caliber players in the 7th and 3rd rounds, for a little over a $1 million dollars is equivalent to catching “lightning with chopsticks.” 

2024, the David Stearns officially took over for the Mets, and he teamed up with for Astros executive Kris Gross, to deliver another stellar haul of impact talent that strategically supplemented our farm system in key areas of need.






2024 Draft Class:

  Name                                Round 
 
Carson Benge                        1st 
Jonathan Santucci                  2nd 
Trey Snyder                           5th 
Will Watson                           7th 
Ryan Lambert                        8th
Brendan Girton                     10th


The 2024 Draft class supplemented the farm system with key players missing from our organizational depth chart. Starting with Benge, who was ranked as our best position player after his first full season. Stearns drafted Jonathan Santucci, who instantly became our best LHP prospect, as well as other impact players in the later rounds.






2025 Draft Class:

 Name                                Round 

Mitch Voit                              1st 
Antonio Jimenez                    2nd 
Peter Kussow                         5th 
Cade Lohman                         7th 
Peyton Prescott                      8th
Truman Pauley                      10th


Despite losing picks for signing Juan Soto, the Mets enjoyed another impressive haul of high upside talent. The Mets bonus pool allotment for the entire class was only a few hundred thousand dollars more than Kevin Parada’s bonus in 2022. They added Peter Kussow who resembles Jacob Misiorowski & Caden Lohman, who’ll remind you of Trey Yesavage because of his delivery. Truman Pauley (12th Rd), has electric stuff and a fastball generating 22.5” of I.V.B and a wipeout “gyro slider”. 

With the farm system overflowing with impact talent every minor league level, social media is on fire with mock trade proposals suggesting the Mets acquire everyone from Tarik Skubal to Sydney Sweeney. These rash mock trades are indicative of a mental health condition known as, “anger displacement”. 


Anger Displacement Definition:

“act of directing anger or frustration towards a target other than the original source of the anger…”

SOURCE   ->  METS 2025 SEASON 

TARGET   ->   METS ENTIRE FARM SYSTEM







 ===>    2022 DRAFT   thru   2025 DRAFT   <===


->  25 selections became -> Top 30 caliber out of 84 selections (4 Drafts)

->  25 Prospects / 84 Selections -> 30% Success Rate

=> 10 Impact Prospects - from selections in Rounds 6 thru 13

->  10 of 25 -> Top Prospects -> procured from RND 6 - 13 

->   RND 6 - 13: ‘22 - ‘25 -> 10 / 32 picks -> 31% success rate 

->   Add: T.Stuart (6), P. Gervase (12) -> 38% success rate

->   RDS 1 - 5: ‘22 - ‘25 -> 15 / 24 picks -> 63% success rate

->   Add: B. Tidwell (2), K. Morris (3), N. Dohm (3) -> 75% success rate

->   RND 14 & Up -> 28 selections -> ZERO % success rate

->   2022 -> 5 of 8 picks -> yielded impact talent or trade asset 

->   2023 -> 7 of 9 picks -> yielded impact talent or trade asset

->   71% -> Top 6 RND picks -> yielded impact talent or trade asset 

->   10 Impact Prospects + 2 Players used in trades 






Analysis of Mets Drafts: 2017 + 2018 + 2019 + 2021


—>     Round 14 - 30 (2017-2019) -> 0% success rate

—>     Rounds 6 - 13: ZERO % SUCCESS RATE

==>   ZERO “Tong Caliber” players drafted = 0% success rate

->       Megill & Vasil only players on MLB rosters

->     Rounds 1 - 5 -> 6 for 20 -> 30% Success Rate 

==>    6 impact players for 110 selections (all 4 drafts)

==>    5  %  Success Rate -> 4 Drafts Combined  <==

->       Baty, Vientos, & Scott, Peterson -> still with team

->       Kelenic & Woods-Richardson -> used in trades


The risk variance associated with success rates for draft selections, the total number of rounds being lowered from thirty to twenty, CBT Tax threshold penalties, and penalties for signing free agents are the primary reasons volatility for future drafts will continue to fluctuate. 

The success rates we’ve seen recently may not be achieved in the future.

In a hypothetical trade for Tarik Skubal, like the ludicrous suggestions being made by the media and fans, it would take a minimum of 4-6 years to replace 4-5 high-caliber prospects, like JETT, Benge, and especially Jonah Tong. Finding a player like Tong in the 7th round, willing to sign for only $226,000, who then blossoms into a potential ace with upper 90s velocity & the potential for 3 plus pitches is as rare as it gets:


2017-2025 || 9 Drafts || Mets had 199 picks || Only one Jonah Tong

PROBABILITY OF DRAFTING ANOTHER JONAH TONG  =  0.50 %


All the data above isn’t there to convince you why the Mets would be foolish to offer 4-5 of their highest ranked prospects for Tarik Skubal, it clearly shows why the Tigers would jump at the opportunity to trade Skubal to a team that is not only desperate and short-sighted.

The Tigers could potentially save at least 7 years, to acquire the same number of high caliber players being offered in recent mock trades. At least 4+ drafts hoping to acquire the players and than another 3+ years to of develop them. 

Of course Detroit is entertaining offers for Skubal, that’s not a major “news scoop” like the “Watergate scandal” or Bruce Jenner becoming Caitlin Jenner, it’s just common sense.

All cards on the table, there isn’t a single scenario that allows the Mets to keep all of the talented players they’ve stockpiled in recent years, it’s impossible.

Believe me, I bloody tried…

Regardless, the Mets need to execute a tactical approach that strategically capitalizes on the surplus of talent we’ve stockpiled in the farm system and MLB roster. Assess which players are nearing MLB promotions, and offer the best chance to add value as regulars. Which prospects are progressing rapidly through the minors, and may not have an immediate fit on the MLB roster.

Replacing 4-6 impact players requires as much luck as it does skill, when identifying and developing potential draft picks.Aside from the risk component built into each draft, the CBT penalties that will be applied annually severely limits the Mets draft capital every year we are over the threshold. 

The current stretch of successful drafts by the Mets, is as phenomenal as it is rare. Whereas the as previous regime’s stretch is a more accurate representation of what is considered to be normal.  

That’s why drafting or signing first-year players has always will remain highly volatile.

The stockpile of talent in the minors earning the Mets the distinction of having M.L.B.’s #1 Farm System is basically “House Money” at a “Blackjack” table. 

They can proceed disciplined and tactical, give themselves a chance to parlay their recent good fortune into the ultimate goal, which is ending the 40 year World Series drought, when it’s within striking distance.



“ONE SHOT, ONE KILL” 





Or they can be proceed undisciplined and short-sighted, not only risking ending up with nothing, but set themselves back decades from ever being in this position ever again…


“I’M PLAYING WITH HOUSE MONEY, UNFORTUNATELY THE HOUSE TOOK IT BACK…”








24 comments:

  1. While many articles have mentioned what it would take to get Skubal, not a single one has mentioned what it would take to get Sydney Sweeney. I suppose it would have to be quite a haul. Asking for a friend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sydney would have to be willing to leave Australia.

      Delete
  2. Also, if you have such bludgeoning drafts, why are you signing Cody Bellinger when you have Soto and Nimmo long term? And why need a Japanese import for first base? On the other hand, maybe you can afford to trade for Skubal, but I believe the Mets have a much better pitcher pipeline than hitter pipeline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Pete leaves, can Baty and Vientos thrive? Or will they feel the heavy weight to pick up the slack? And not be able to handle the pressure?

      Delete
  3. Great summary. This has clearly been a success area for the Mets in the past three years. The talent pipeline is healthy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a difference in draft selection & player development - & player development is just really ramping up. Exciting area of the organization.

    Regarding how best to deploy this capital (put it to work in SC finance terms) - since the team is already a high salary borderline playoff team - how do we finally capitalize on the remainder of Li sir’s prime years. He is 32 now so there is a 2-3 year window to win now.

    IMO, given his window & SCs overt goal of winning a WS, they need to parlay all of their capital to add sufficient youth while competing. Can’t “waste” next season.

    This means some combination of strategic FA signings 30 or younger for any multi year signings, several rookies from our system & a couple 20 something’s that have proven they can play well in the league.

    Obviously, the pitching staff can (and will) be rebuilt to reflect this. The position players already have a decent balance of youth & younger semi-established players with two rookies almost ready, so one more established star position player, one start established starter, one established mid rotation starter, Diaz plus two more reliable relievers.

    We have the cash, prospects & MLB talent to do this.

    Will be fascinating to see how David Stearns implements this year. We have to be able to compete against the Dodgers in the playoffs. That has to be the marker.

    Can anyone say $400M payroll next year!?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great read Angry Mike.
    I am all for using our kids in 2026 and building towards a top team in 2027. Mets don't need to go crazy, sign a #3 type pitcher and at least 2 reliable BP arms.

    2026 will have a full year of McLean, a stronger Clay Holmes, Peterson was great the first half but somehow got lost in the second half. But the Mets can start Sproat and Tong at AAA for a couple of months and then bring them up.

    But whatever the Mets do should not involved trading the future. See what you have first by playing them and adjust from there.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Angry Mike, never go to Anger Management. Stay ANGRY!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It will be a few weeks, but I am going to republish a detailed analysis I did of the bad, old draft days of not too many years ago. Never go back there! It sure seems the new guys get it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great stuff AM even in the pm. I just have to live long enough to see it come to fruition as we come up to 40 years since our last WS and tired of waiting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The 2023 and 2024 draft arms are looking incredible

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Earnest,
      How do you view the 2025 draft? Mike has given us 5-6 good prospects he feels good about. Your thoughts?

      Delete
  10. Sorry Angry Mike, I love reading about our minors and all but to me and in my opinion this was not a concise and easy to follow Read,
    and what I got out of it was that we do well in the later rounds while our success in the First rounds are weak.
    You omitted Parada, which is a big omission as a failure. We lost Kumar which lead to Parada ( so it that twice the failure) and Personally if the Draft is a crap shoot, then the later rounds are even more so. If we knew Tong was going to be such a successful pick why would we risk him not being available in the and let him fall to the 7th round.

    I want to be successful in the first 2 rounds and on this site there has been a history of articles of those failures.
    Jett and benge will get their crack really soon on showing how good the farm is but i sure as heck would have liked the next 5 years of Crochect over whatever Jett and Sproat become.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The article focused on the success we’ve had in recent years and how we made up for missing on players like Parada and others. Everyone wants to be successful in the early rounds. Unfortunately that doesn’t always happen..We just have to be happy we are finding quality talent throughout the draft and doing a good job to develop them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Much better job of late. In a few weeks, I will re-run an old article that shows how horrible Mets drafts were for years. I am not updating it, but it is a cautionary tale….KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BUYING,

      Delete
  12. Eddie, my brother Steve was screaming for the Mets to go after Crochet. Not doing so, at least for 2025, wasa huge mistake. He was great.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Great article. All about opportunity costs and strategic planning. I outlined a way to upgrade position player mix and balance the lineup at minimal cost: Sign Bellinger His primary position would be LF. Move Nimmo to 1st base, where his good hands and BB instincts will serve him well. Sign Pete (if possible, but only on condition of 70/30 split of DH/IB respectively). DH from right side is Pete; from left side rotation as resting calls for of Soto, Bellinger, Nimmo. Two options with McNeil: keep for last year of contract as ultimate versatility of 2B, LF, when Bellinger plays CF or right field when SOTO Dhs. Or trade as part of package. Keep Acuna as utility infielder, and one of Mauricio or Vientos; Benge and Williams first potential callups Just a thought

    ReplyDelete