As the New York Mets’ losing streak continues to extend, now reaching 11 games (longest since 2004), there has been much written about the futility. Of course, when things are going very wrong, everyone wants a reason. They need to blame someone for the disappointment of watching a team full of promise take a nosedive. Let’s look at the potential culprits:
A) It’s the starting pitching. Well, certainly we have not gotten the best out of new ace Freddy Peralta with his 4.05 ERA in 26.2 innings. Kodai Senga has been a bust since his second start, with an 8.83 ERA, 1.90 WHIP, and only 17 innings pitched in four starts. David Peterson has lost his starting job already. But McLean has been very good (2.28 ERA, 0.76 WHIP) and Holmes has been solid (1.96 ERA, 1.09 WHIP) so it would be difficult to say that starting pitching is the reason for 11 straight losses. It’s not them.
B) It’s the Manager. We have all had a few things to say about Carlos Mendoza’s management of the pitching staff and some of his peculiar choices to sit players after a good game. But when you see the way this team has performed on the field, making physical and mental mistakes and failing to execute pitches and at-bats, it is hard to imagine that Gil Hodges could do any better. It’s not him.
C) It’s the bullpen. The last two losses were late give-aways with two different relievers throwing middle-middle pitches in critical situations and being burned. That really hurts. But when the team scores 19 runs in 11 games, anything less than perfect saves nothing. It’s not them.
D) It’s the “new core”. David Stearns replaced much of the core of the 2025 team with a new set of players. Gone are McNeil, Nimmo, Alonso, and others. Here are Semien, Polanco, and Bichette. The latter three have done little to help this team win, but the former three were present for the team’s long, slow crash out of the playoffs and they didn’t pick it up. It’s not them.
E) It’s David Stearns. As just mentioned, Stearns made the decision to blow up the core and rebuild the team. Stearns signed a bunch of veterans off waivers or low end free agent deals to build in “depth”. Stearns brought in Peralta but not Cease; he brought in Bichette but not Tucker. As you have seen from the series by RVH, he had a plan that was very feasible and he took action when many GMs would have just run last year’s team out there expecting a different result. It’s not him.
F) It’s the injuries. Juan Soto came up lame. Polanco never really seemed healthy. AJ Minter had not recovered. These are all factors that may have impacted the team, but these injuries are nowhere near the level of adversity faced in prior seasons by this team or any other ballclub. It’s not that.
G) It’s the coaching. Somehow the Mets’ entire lineup can’t get a hit in a critical situation, ranking 26th in MLB in average with RISP. Overall, the team has the 23rd best batting average in a league with 30 teams. They can’t all go bad at once, so it must be the hitting coaches. Well, look again. The same thing happened to this team last year with an entirely different set of hitting coaches. They all got let go so we could start fresh with new ones. Same with the pitching coaches. It’s not them.
I could go on, but you get the gist. In fact, if you can force yourself to watch the post-game analysis and interviews of the manager and the players, you get a similar result. This collapse cannot be pinned on one thing. It seems like everything contributes at different times (and always the worst times). Some would say, “That’s baseball” because there are always some set of unexpected results in baseball games due to the difficulty of the game. But uncanny coincidence of many events to bring on such a mind boggling losing streak can only happen rarely. This has happened twice in a row if you consider last year’s post-June collapse.
There is one last possibility. It is a curse. Yes, the word that was once associated with the futility in Boston and Chicago is now taking root in Flushing Meadows. The curse has unknown origins, but could date all the way back to 1987 when the defending champion Mets were expected to become a dynasty but lost the NL East to the Cardinals and were dismantled over the next few years. It was certainly there in 2006 with the stunning game 7 loss in the NLCS. The curse was intensified by Jimmy Rollins in 2007 causing them to lose a seven game lead with 17 to play. It was there in 2015 when the hottest team in baseball cooled off against the Royals. The curse was in full effect last year to will the team to failure. There are countless ghosts that come back to haunt the team in the form of cast-off former players that did not perform in Queens but rise to stardom elsewhere. In yesterday’s game the ghost of Michael Conforto drove home PCA (ghost of Javy Baez) to neutralize the Mets’ lead in the bottom of the 9th.
I think it’s time for Pedro Cerrano to sacrifice a live chicken (if you remember the move “Major League”). He can summon Jobu to take fear from the bats. Maybe that is a solution that the front office has not yet considered.

I believe the source of the curse is two-fold. I write this as a native NY’er & lifetime Mets fan:
ReplyDeleteOnce the Dodgers & Giants left NYC, NY was destined to be a Yankees-only town. Then the trade of PRIME Seaver was our version of “trading the Bambino” or “the (Chicago) Black Cat”
We can’t even play competitive with the highest spending owner-fan & the “smartest” PoBO in the game.
WTF?!
I think the curse started the day. The owners made a deal with the devil in order to secure those three pivotal words. GETS BY BUCKNER. THE LAST 40 YEARS OF METSDOM have not gone, particularly well by anyone’s measure
DeleteHa ha, great tongue and cheek article! As Met fans we can use some good laughs and not take it too seriously. I was just a little boy and remember when Jack Fisher lost 24 games in 1965. My dad would laugh and say Fisher is a 20 game loser. 😂. I still watched with passion , they were and still are my team . LGM!
ReplyDeleteChuck, Fisher won 8 games that season, though. Will the Mets have an 8 game winner this year? I really do wonder.
DeleteThe Mets don’t stand a ”ghost” of a chance. One other factor…the THREE DISCARDS, Alonso, Brandon, and Jeff, remain Iron Men. Their three teams have played a combined 66 games, in which they have participated in 65. Durability certainly matters. Meanwhile, in their careers, Robert, Bichette and Polanco have proven to be anything but durable. I wonder if David thought about that when he made these moves in the off-season
ReplyDeleteLet me remind everyone that while David was cleaning house in Queens, the Yankees decided to keep Aaron Judge. Chew on that one for a while.
ReplyDeleteThere is much to blame Stearns for, but I don't think it is correct to say that he brought in Polanco, Robert and Semien to replace the core he sent packing or allowed to leave. Those players are all on short term contracts, and they were designed primarily for two purposes: to help carry the team to a good outcome for a year or two, and to provide a bridge to the wave of true replacements currently playing for minor league affiliates -- the majority of whom were not ready for the majors. Those players are the true replacements for the core, and they will be the next core along with some of the younger players on the team now, both position players and pitchers. He was to use an RVH phrase, alligning players for long term runs, not replacing anyone directly. not yet anyway. The swing at Tucker is evidence as well that he thought even Benge could have used some additional time in the minors. Tong belongs in the minors as well and the best of the rest of the next wave of pitchers and position players would, had things gone better for this year's Mets, would have had staggered arrivals over the next two years.
ReplyDeleteOne can argue that he could have continued on with the core for the short term and have them serve as the bridge, but that would have been costly and not fully possible actually, and it would not have resolved obvious clubhouse chemistry problems. Alonso wanted a contract that was too long for someone whose internal role was, by Stearns' lights, to be part of a bridge; same for Nimmo.
He whiffed on letting Diaz go, but Diaz wanted to win now. He got value for value in the Brewers trade, but his next wave of players included potential replacements for Williams with higher upside, and equal upside for Sproat. Everyone thought at the time that the pivot to Bichette was brilliant, and it may yet prove to be a very good move. No one in their right mind would at this point think that either Baty or Vientos is the solution at 3B when the next wave arrives.
The plan still makes great sense to me, and the performance of the key players in the next wave (with the exception of Benge who is admittedly struggling) has been grounds for real optimism: Morabito, Ewing, Pena, at positions, Wenninger, Santucci among pitchers, and so on.
The problem is simply that the current team is failing in its mission of being a contender and providing a bridge.
Those are both extremely important roles for them to play. Stearns had reason to believe they would accomplish both roles. As in most organizations of any sort, authority is disconnected from accountability, and in keeping with that Mendoza may well have to go. And I believe that Stearns is partially reluctant to do that because he knows he is accountable for the plan, and that the players brought in to bridge and contend are at least partially responsible for its current failure. Mendoza has certainly not helped, but I think that Stearns is smart enough to see the overall picture and to not overstate Mendoza's contribution to its failure to this point.
Misery loves company more: Diaz line yesterday:
ReplyDeleteO IP, 3 hits, 3 runs, 3 ER, 1BB
Clearly his knee is hurting. But he is not pitching well for the LAD
Long term contracts are anathema to baseball. How many guys crumble when they get them?
DeleteWoke up this morning to some bad news
ReplyDeleteMendoza is still manager. I count at least 4 miscues from yesterday's game. Pulling Myers after two innings and pulling Peterson after 3 1/3 . Goal should be to win with fewer pitchers not more. Not asking Vientos to bunt in the 10th and finally not walking Hoener. Sorry, he needs to go.