Former Reds pitcher Frank Pastore, who was injured in a car accident on
Nov. 19, passed away Monday afternoon after four weeks in a coma. The Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin reported last month that Pastore was driving a motorcycle
when he was struck by a car. The driver of the car had lost control, according
to California Highway Patrol Sgt. Aaron Knarr, and hit Pastore’s Honda Shadow
in the car pool lane. The driver of the car wasn’t hurt and was not
intoxicated. Pastore, 55, went 48-58 with a 4.29 ERA in an eight-year major
league career that spanned 1979-86. He spent his first seven years with the
Reds before finishing out his career as a reliever for the Twins. He had his
best year in 1980, going 13-7 with a 3.27 ERA and a 110/42 K/BB ratio in 184
2/3 innings. Before the accident, he hosted a Christian radio show on KKLA in
Los Angeles http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/17/former-major-leaguer-frank-pastore-dies-after-four-weeks-in-coma/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
And all of this is
without really tackling D’Arnaud specifically. The player himself provides one
last possible issue: he’s a large man. At six-foot-two, there’s a chance that
his size will limit his longevity. He’s 24 next year, and may see a drop-off in
his ability to stay on the field before his years under team control are over,
or so suggests that research from Jeff Zimmerman.
Prospects are iffy. Prospects whose best
offensive seasons came in hitter-friendly parks might be more so. And (large?)
catching prospects might even provide an additional layer of uncertainty. By
all accounts, Travis D’Arnaud is an excellent
all-around catcher and a great get for the rebuilding Mets. Given all those
question marks, though, it’s still good news that there are other interesting
names coming back to the Mets in the R.A. Dickey deal. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/travis-darnaud-las-vegas-and-catching-prospects
“I can’t tell you I
was completely surprised. I knew, when the offers started coming in and I was
negotiating with the Mets, I figured we were going to be in for a longer
negotiation. At that point, the longer it goes, the more doubt can creep into
your mind about, you know, ‘are they serious? Is this something they really
want to do? Are we getting it going?’ All the human attributes start coming
out. So, I’m not real sure if it was all just strategy, or if they really had
an intention to sign me from the beginning. But I think, like all things, I
think it grew into this. They started saying they might not be able to pay what
I was asking for, and they thought they might get some good players in return.
It just kind of grew into what it became. I don’t think there was ever an
initial strategy one way or another.”
Cot has updated their
Mets salaries, taking off Josh Thole and RA Dickey and adding John Buck. They
list Buck as a $6.5mil add-on, but what’s not on there is the $4mil that
Toronto will kick in to pay him. The total Mets salary is now $70.675, which
includes $18.125 to Jason Bay. Take that $4mil off of the Buck number and you
have a pre-ARB 2013 salary of $66.675. Seems to me there is plenty of money for
an OFer.
Mack,
ReplyDeleteIn terms of the salary obligations you are forgetting that payroll includes everyone on the 40 man roster.
Also for 2013 they are counting Santana's 5.5MM buyout since there is no chance he'll be back next year.
Also missing is Bobby Bonilla's $1.19MM and Jason Bay's 6MM to be paid this season sans the offset clause.
As for Buck, Toronto DID NOT send cash to offset his contract. Thole +Dickey's salary=Buck's salary and Toronto was already at there salary cap and therefore could not commit the money.
All in all I'm adding up to a current payroll of $97.99 post arbitration (using MLBTR forecasted arb numbers).
Toronto is NOT kicking 4 million into Buck's salary. Toronto had a choice...kick in cash or give over another prospect, which Toronto ended up doing with the 18 yr old from Venezuela.
ReplyDeleteWhoops sorry counted the YEAR 2013 in my equation. Putting up a post of current payroll now.
ReplyDeletewell, sometimes I simply chose to quote others here... thanks Soto and Anon for clearing up the Buck bucks.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the Mets 2013 salaries... my guess is there is still $7mil left to spend... if I'm wrong, why are they still talking to people?
Approximately 12MM left to spend Mack. Just posted the actual salary obligations above
ReplyDeleteDamn my Math is off today $15MM left to spend
ReplyDelete