With all of the acrimony about the Mets’ refusal to
entertain a return of Yoenis Cespedes, I got to thinking what was really the
issue here? He’s a quality ballplayer
for sure, and arguably better than anyone currently on the offensive side of
the roster. He carried the team on his
back and catapulted the Mets into their first post-season in seemingly forever
and their first World Series appearance in 15 years. All of these facts are well documented
already. However, I don’t think that’s
the crux of the issue at all.
What Mets fans tasted last year was something that’s been
lacking since soon-to-be-Hall-of-Famer Mike Piazza departed for San Diego and later
Oakland. What he had was a presence in
the lineup that could turn the game around with a single swing of the bat. As long as the game was within 4 runs and you
knew Mike Piazza was coming up, then you wouldn’t want to get up for a beer or
flip the channel because you knew his at-bat had the potential to be something
special.
During this past summer Yoenis Cespedes brought that kind of
magic to the Mets ballclub. It wasn’t
simply the homers. It was the fear in
the opposing pitchers’ eyes and the belief that as long as Yo was scheduled to
hit then the game wasn’t really over.
There have been other must-see ABs by Mets players in the
past. During the lean years of the 1970s and early 1980s Dave Kingman provided those kind of will he or won’t he moments (though in his
case it was going to be a K or long ball and not much else).
As good as the 1986 team was, there were hitters all around
the lineup who could help contribute to victories. Sorry, but Gary Carter coming to the plate
was a good thing but not a legendary thing.
Ditto Keith Hernandez. That team
could win a multitude of ways with the baserunning of Mookie Wilson and Lenny
Dykstra , the balls up the gap from Ray Knight and Wally Backman, and of course
the stellar pitching. They didn’t have
that Roy Hobbsian Wonderboy element yet managed to dominate their way to the
incredible Game 6 comeback and Game 7 win.
What Yoenis Cespedes did for the team last year is
undeniable but if you look at his track record it was also unsustainable. The Cuban basher was a solid if not superstar
caliber player good for 25 HRs and 88 RBIs prior to this one breakout
season. Now, no one would turn down that
kind of production, but it’s not the stuff on which Cooperstown careers are
built. Baseballreference.com has him
ranked just barely inside the top 1000 players of all time between luminaries
like Jason Kipnis and Manny Mota.
While everyone is rightfully frustrated about the lie
perpetrated that the team would spend when they contended and the gate receipts
increased, doling out David Wright money to another player providing good but
unspectacular production would be bad business all around. Yes, they could use another centerfield
option – perhaps a speed burner like Denard Span or Ben Revere – to add a
dimension to their attack, but with the Madoff mess still very much a part of
the Wilpons’ collective debt it’s unlikely to see superstar sluggers getting
long term deals for the foreseeable future.
I hear you, Reese, but I still want Yo.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRespectfully disagree.
ReplyDeleteEconomics of Major League Baseball is such that 5 tool outfielders that produce and are considered probable future "Hall of Fame Players", would receive contracts much larger than Cespedes will receive this off season.
Cespedes will not even receive a contract that is at the level Heywood received this year.
I don't believe anybody has been forecasting Heywood as a "Hall of Fame Player" yet.
So, Cespedes' price will more than likely be appropriate for Major League Baseball's current economics, if not more to the bargain side due to the perceived lack of interest.
If Yo falls far enough, I'd sign him. It seems the fall is underway
DeleteIf Yo falls far enough, I'd sign him. It seems the fall is underway
DeleteI should have clarified -- it's unlikely to see sluggers getting long term deals FROM THE METS for the foreseeable future.
ReplyDeleteAhhhhhh.
DeleteNow THAT is appearantly undeniable.
How could you leave Straw man's name off the list....excuse me??
ReplyDeleteWe should offer a 1 year deal for 24 million and keep the clause where we wouldn't be able to offer arbitration, this way he can go back on the market next year and he can establish his value with a team that is a WS contender...
ReplyDeleteLike it, Eddie.
Delete@ICCFCI -- wow, major egg on my face. My bad. Darryl was indeed that kind of player.
ReplyDeleteSaying you won't see contracts of more than 4 years at big bucks from the Mets is not necessarily a bad thing. It would take an EXCEPTIONAL player who really WANTS to be here and who has demonstrated his ability to deal with New York.
ReplyDeleteYo would meet the second part of that, but not enough of the first part. If he'd sign a deal like Gordon's, the Mets shouldn't hesitate.But no more than 4 years.
I challenge anyone to look back 10 years and find long-term deals that have really worked for the team. I see Holliday, and probably Grandy.
Nut then I see at least 10 that turned out to be total busts or two good years that turned into busts.
Anyone?
1st Alex Rodriguez contract.
DeleteDerek Jeter's big contract.
DeleteBeltran.
Miguel Cabrera.
Miguel Cabrera
DeleteBuster Posey
Manny Ramirez
Troy Tulowitzki
Adrian Gonzalez
Mike Trout
Freddie Freeman
Ken Griffey Jr
Ryan Braun
Albert Pujols 1st big contract
Mariano Rivera
DeleteCome on now Bob...lets take this one at a time…
ReplyDeleteNone of Adrian gonzalez, Buster Posey, Freddie freeman, or Mike trout are more than half way through their contracts.
Miguel Cabrera. First contract was great, the extension has widely been viewed as a terrible decision.
Braun no way, he has been awful and tulowitzki is debatable
Ken griffey jr- obviously a great player and hofer, but the reds contract was a disaster. He was never the same player with the reds.
Alex Rodriguez, Carlos Beltran, and Derek Jeter, Manny, pujols, great contracts.
So from this we can conclude, signing a hall of famer (or close to it) before they hit age 30 to a big contract is a pretty good decision.
Yoenis is not in the same league of player as most that you mentioned, and is considerably older than all the players whose contracts turned out good.
The problem with Yoenis is fairly simple. We need a cf, not a corner outfielder. Yoenis' has shown to be a terrible defensive cf. I would imagine the mets would live with his defense if he could hit like he did in 2015. However, 2015 is such an outlier offensively. If he returns to his offensive norm and plays cf, he would be a disaster.
ReplyDeleteOn top of that he is 30, has some (minor as it seems) attitude questions, and wants 25+ per year. Quite the gamble..
Finch
ReplyDeleteMy response can not be made any better than in many of the explanations you made regarding the 1st contracts.
The question was not: Which players have ALWAYS received EVERY ONE of their big contracts and had it worth while.
The question was: Simply. Give examples of when big contracts that worked out for the team.
So, without researching, just off the top of my head, I came up with
6 examples you admit are great examples.
2 that you admit are debateable.
and 2 that you question, but the players performance can easily be used to debate your judgement.
Cespedes is a different question.
Keep in mind also, just as you state that Cespedes is not in the same category as many of the above players, it is looking more and more likely that he will not receive a "top of the league" contract.
It is looking more probable that Cespedes's contract will be for 4-5 yrs and possibly below $20 million/yr.
Remember, Top of the league contracts are now pushing $25-$35 million/yr.
You are correct. However, I still think at minimum cespedes gets a 100+ contract. If we had Michael conforto, the young cf and Juan lagares, the struggling lf, I would be right behind you and others advocating a cespedes or Upton signing. Current situation is more of a square peg, round hole in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteDenard Span on the other hand...
To me it was Darryl and Mike who I wouldn't miss an AB. Kingman only because he was our offense in the dark days and only us OCD Met fans cared. It looks to me as though it would behoove us as a franchise, knowing the disaster of long term 2nd gen. contracts, to use our good young talent until 2 years before FA and deal them for 2 or 3 top prospects avoiding the dreaded long term deal and restocking the farm. The FO probably won't ever spend big $$$ again and frankly its probably the best option anyway.
ReplyDelete