Many of the people were puzzled by the outside-the-box
decision to hire Brodie Van Wagenen to head up the Mets’ front office. While there is obviously going to be a period
of adjustment to being on the other side of the desk for the first time, for
the most part people are happy that he’s expressing some creativity in the
prospective roster changes that need to be made.
Unfortunately, a lot of that goodwill may come crashing down
quickly if the reports are true that the Mets are signing Chili Davis to be the
hitting instructor. I have nothing
against the man personally, but his track record is fairly suspect. This past season he served as the hitting
instructor for the Chicago Cubs and the media was rife with the, “What happened
to the Cubs offense?” stories throughout their playoff push in September. In fact, in their final series of the year
they managed just 1 run in 3 of the final four games (which means he’ll fit
right in with the Mets).
Personnel decisions are complicated in high profile
endeavors like a professional sports team, particularly one based in the
media-intense atmosphere of New York.
You obviously need to evaluate track record, philosophy, communications
skills, character and media perception.
While there’s some truth to the old cliché, “Those who can’t do, teach”,
the fact remains that if you picked a career offensive lightweight like Mario
Mendoza to be your hitting instructor the media would have an absolute field
day trashing you for making that choice.
Now Chili Davis as a player was a far more impressive force
in the lineup. He’s a career .274 hitter
and three-time All Star who played on three World Series teams with the Twins
and twice with the Yankees. Those are
good bonafides to show you have ability to hit a baseball, but the job of a hitting
instructor is more about teaching players to get the most out of their natural
ability, how to remain focused, how to adapt to changing pitching philosophies
or defensive shifts, and, of course, worshipping at the church of launch angle.
When you delve into the teams where Davis was at the helm of
run production, it’s not a pretty sight.
We already spoke about the downfall of the Chicago Cubs from juggernaut
to Mets-like. They were 4th
in MLB in 2017 in runs scored with 824 and a team batting average of .255. Under Davis’ leadership they dropped to 9th
in runs scored with 761 and a similar .258 batting average. Remember, this a team which has in its lineup
Anthony Rizzo, Javy Baez, Ben Zobrist, Kris Bryant (though hurt some of the
year), Willson Contreras, Kyle Schwarber and Daniel Murphy! The Red Sox players like Mookie Betts, Andrew
Benintendi and Xander Bogaerts all flourished in 2018 in a Davis-less
environment.
Prior to his stint with the Red Sox he worked with the
Oakland A’s for three years from 2012 to 2014.
During this stint by the Bay he inherited a team 20th in
baseball in runs scored with a team batting average of .244. During his first year the number of runs
scored jumped by 68 but the batting averaged dipped to .238. In his sophomore season he fostered a
dramatic jump in offense good enough for 4th in all of MLB. In his final Oakland team in 2014 he
maintained that 4th position but the batting average dipped to .244
once again.
People will accuse me of kicking a dead horse, but this
Alderson-like move is reminiscent of hiring Terry Collins whose Houston Astros
and Anaheim Angels teams improved dramatically once he left. The Cubs saw their offense disappear while he
was calling the shots and the Red Sox improved once he was gone.
So why would Brodie Van Wagenen look to Davis to fix the
problematic offense? The best rationale
I can surmise is that he did his best work with an Oakland team full of no-name
players who needed motivation and direction, whereas in his Boston and Chicago
stints he inherited a bunch of established All-Star types who may not have been
as receptive to his style. The Mets may
be going into 2019 with young players in the lineup regularly, including
Brandon Nimmo, Michael Conforto, Amed Rosario, Jeff McNeil and Peter
Alonso. Perhaps that is the basis of BVW’s
thinking…otherwise the decision to hire the man with the checkered track record
makes little sense.
What kids? We're trading them, it appears.
ReplyDeleteMorning Reese -
ReplyDeleteDavis has had repeated instances in which he has been accused of bullying the younger players of the teams he was on.
Now he will join Brodie's other acquisition, a 35-year old infielder.
Do we see a trend here?
(had to remove his pic)
The Pic was from Google
Delete's authorized for reuse list.
Reese is giving Davis a "Chili" reception.
ReplyDeleteHopefully he will turn the offense into hot chili and not chilly chilly.
I think Bryant's drop off last year skunked them, but you offer fair and analytic warning, which is good to know. Thanks, Reese.
This trade has completely soured me on the Mets. I cant take anything seriously with them anymore. Come on. This site will spend 2020-2023 trying to figure out a way to get rid of Cano's contract. And Kelenic will be a top 30 prospect in baseball by the end of the year. None of which will end up with the Mets winning the world series in the next 5 years. Im just done.
ReplyDeleteOne thought: given the Mets system's history of player development (very disappointing!), even though Kelenic may have future star potential- isn't there a very strong chance he would never live up to it (due to not being developed correctly by the irganization)?
ReplyDeleteRobb
ReplyDeleteI am out and about right now.
Will put up OPEN THREAD on trade proposal as soon as I get home
Chili Davis is a mixed bag, as you stated.
ReplyDeleteI still think the talent on the field is more important then the coach, but a good coach can elevate his team to an extent (or a bad one can suppress the team). Hopefully, Mr Davis will bring a "contact/situational" hitting emphasis over the outdated "wait for the 3 run homer" philosophy that Sandy seemed to favor.
Most stupid deal since getting rid of Tom Seaver
ReplyDeleteCan tbelieve the lunacy here