Good
morning.
Signed:
July 2nd Period, 2015 from Netherlands (NYM)
Age 19.7 Height 6′
4″ Weight 180 Bat
/ Thr S / R FV 45+
Tool
Grades (Present/Future)
Hit Raw Power Game
Power Run Fielding Throw
20/40 50/60
20/50 50/50 40/50 55/55
Newton
was the best of a small contingent of prospects who the Mets pushed right past
the GCL and straight to advanced rookie-level Kingsport for their first
American summer. There, Newton outperformed even the most optimistic
expectations, hitting .280/.408/.449 with 23 extra-base
hits. Newton is much more of a physical marvel on which to dream than he is
a polished performer. At a very projectable 6-foot-4, he’s the size of an NFL
wide receiver prospect and already has considerable raw power that projects to
plus at maturity. It’s rare for infielders this size to stay at shortstop, but
Newton looks natural and comfortable there even though he clearly hasn’t
totally grown into his body yet and appears uncoordinated at other times. Even
if he outgrows short, switch-hitting third basemen with power are extremely
valuable. Newton has less bat control and feel to hit than his .280 batting
average would otherwise indicate, and there’s a chance he’s always strikeout
prone and doesn’t get to some of his power. But it’s unreasonable to expect a
switch-hitting teenager this size to have fully sentient bat control, and the
ceiling on Newton if everything actualizes is superstardom. This is one of the
more high-variance prospects in the minor leagues.
Addy Baird -
@addysue - Remember when Julian Edelman (Matt Harvey’s fav athlete) stole Matt Harvey’s
girlfriend and Matt didn’t show up for a game and got suspended for three days
The shortstop on our
All-Defense Team, Gimenez reached Double-A in 2018 as a teenager. While he
needs to add strength offensively, he has everything he needs to play shortstop
defensively in the big leagues. He has plus hands, range and the internal clock
to allow him to slow the game down.
He is perhaps most
famously known for the "bloody sock game," Game 6 of the American
League Championship Series against the Yankees, on Oct. 19, 2004. In that game,
Schilling pitched despite having an ankle injury, and TV cameras focused on the
blood visible on his sock during the game, which Boston won 4-2.
After spending his first seven years in professional baseball with the New York Mets — including parts of the past four seasons in the major leagues — Plawecki was traded on Jan. 6. Those video clips provided the former Boilermaker a head start on learning about the pitching staff he will now handle.
Back in West
Lafayette for Purdue baseball's First Pitch winter baseball banquet, Plawecki
expected to be at the Indians' spring training complex in Goodyear, Arizona, by
Monday. There he planned to load an iPad with better video clips of a staff
that led the American League in shutouts last season.
Once pitchers and
catchers report to spring training on Feb. 12, he can start building a rapport
with his new teammates. In limited interleague play experience, Plawecki
totaled only five at-bats against pitchers currently on the Indians. Three came
against two-time Cy Young Award winner Corey Kluber.
Mack –
I can’t refer to Plawecki using his first name since I technically never met
him.
I tried
to interview him twice when he was in Savannah. The procedure was simple…
approach the media rep for the team on the field during practice, give him two
names of players you’d like to interview, and wait for them in the dugout when
the players took their 5pm dinner break. In both cases he blew me off telling
the media rep that he wasn’t feeling well (of course, he went on and played
those nights).
There
are just too many players out there you can help build their careers. As Mr.
Wonderful says, from that moment on he was dead to me.
Royce Ring will join the Fireflies staff this season as pitching coach, replacing Jonathan Hurst who was with the team since the Inaugural Season in 2016. Royce was selected in the first round by the Chicago White Sox in 2002. The lefthander would go on to make his way to the majors in 2005, where he had stints with the Mets, Atlanta Braves, San Diego Padres and the New York Yankees. While with the Mets, Royce finished with a 3.47 ERA after appearing in 26 games.
After finishing his
playing career in 2013, Royce joined the Mets coaching staff as pitching coach
with the Gulf Coast Mets (Rookie) from 2014 to 2015. He was also the pitching
coach with the Kingsport Mets (2016, Rookie) and the Brooklyn Cyclones (2017 to
2018, Short Season-A) before moving to Columbia this season.
I hope Royce Ring is not the only new ring in this organization in 2019.
ReplyDeleteSherveyn Newton is exactly the type of athletic prospect they should sign more of.
Gimenez seems to be the type that can get extremely defensive. Lets hope he can be extremely offensive too.
I think we'll see more of these athletic prospects, especially in international signings, now that Omar is back in a role that allows him to concentrate on scouting and evaluating.
ReplyDeleteCurt Schilling and Mike Mussina - the difference? Mussina pitched for better teams, so his win % was higher. Mussina fanned fewer and had a higher ERA. Schilling should get in if Mussina does.
ReplyDeleteI have Gimenez and Mauricio playing SS and 3B someday with Newton in the outfield.
ReplyDeleteI agree as well Mack. Maybe Vientos in left and Newton in right.
DeleteBill -
ReplyDeleteyou and I both assume that Omar will traveling to the small towns to scout all these kids, but I am not sure he is going to do this. Look for delegating to an underling here.
I have no illusions about stretching him out like that. I see him going out AFTER a scout has alerted him to a possible talent.
DeleteLatin America, though, is where I see him being more hands-on in scouting and using his connections there to identify targets.
Being in the Hall should be based on talent, results, and lack of PED's
ReplyDeleteSchilling should be in the Hall.
Ditto Pete.
So what does that say about some of the folks on the ballots that people think belong in the Hall partially as a result of their suppliers?
ReplyDeleteDamn, I didn't realize Newton was 6-4! It sounds like he is one to keep an eye on, for sure.
ReplyDeleteWhat's interesting is where do you play him? We have some depth at SS and he likely outgrows that spot, anyway. Maybe third base? But what about Vientos? Mauricio? OK, so how about the OF? Maybe LF if NImmo can become your permanent CF'er, but that is still few years away. Nice to see some prospects in the pipeline, despite the trades that were made this offseason.
Royce Ring might be a rising star as a pitching coach? It will be interesting to see if he can keep this up as he moves up to a new level......although, he is basically following the same set of pitchers as they move along, as well. By design, perhaps?
As far as Schilling is concerned, his "outspoken" style likely doesn't help his cause, but that's just my opinion of course.
Oh and KPlaw is the definition of mediocre.....ironic that he played the "Diva card" with you, Mack.
Mike
DeleteThe good thing here is we are watching the cream slowly rise to the top regarding prospect depth.
Mack already has Pete Alonso ticketed for the HOF! (Kidding, I know which Pete).
ReplyDeleteZozo, I look forward to a big, big season from Vientos.
Newton has to cut down on Ks, but otherwise, he looks real good. He walked a lot, too, so he might be attempting to really learn the strike zone early on and willing to have higher Ks short term to have it down pat later when it really counts.
Schilling should be borderline by the statistics. I'm not sure you can count the teams of Mussina's first half of his career as better then schillings. So i think they are comparable and I think Mussina was the better pitcher (we forget how good he was as an Oriole).
ReplyDeleteIt's not like Schilling will be the first racist to be elected to the Hall. He woudnt be the first douchebag either (plenty to go around). Christ he wont even be the first HoF to defraud a state government as a business man elected (there is a whole wing for the owners who got stadiums built), but i'd rather have bonds or clemmens in there. Both were jerks to the media too, but both were better players before steroids then Schilling ever was. And both didnt go out courting controversy after their playing days to the point where you'd be worried about them disrespecting the hall in their speeches. Shilling is flat out carl everrett loony based on the interview he gave this week (its on deadspin).
So i'll say it this way, if Schilling gets in before his last year i'd be surprised. If he gets in then, so be it. If not he's at fault. Dont bite the hand that feeds you without being willing to live with the consequences. He can go hang out with rose who was ten times the player he ever was.
Also if harold baines is a hall of famer, Kieth Hernandez surely is.
Robb, agree on Keith...Mattingly too
ReplyDeleteCurt Schilling is a disgrace.
ReplyDeleteI can only hope the only way he gets into the Hall is the same way as the visiting public during hours of operation. Character is one of the criteria for the Hall and Schilling miserably fails there.
About Keith Hernandez.
ReplyDeleteAs much as I like the guy, and think his stats could be Hall worthy under today's entry standards, his drug use and subsequent punishment which some of you may not know or wish to forget initially involved suspension for the entire 1986 season.
That suspension was later rescinded and punishment reduced for a number of players involved in the drug scandal that embarrassed MLB and resulted in national story, including subpoenas to testify in court. Keith was among those.
For those who don't think suspected or known PED users should be Hall of Famers, then in my opinion, neither should Keith Hernandez whose drug habit spanned years.
BTW, I don't think Mussina and Baines deserve to be in the Hall on the merits. We just see the drumbeat watering down entry. In my view, the Hall should be for great players - not just good.
Drug addiction is an illness. PED use is not. I seriously doubt that Cocaine helped Keith become a perennial All-Star, but I KNOW that it helped him become a Met who got us a WS title.
ReplyDeleteBill, thanx for clarifying. Keith didn't look like a roid-head. And Mack, I think it delicious that Kevin Plawecki is planetary in Kevin Plawecki' s mind.
ReplyDeleteBill metsiac
ReplyDeleteYou're simplifying the scope of Hernandez's actions and making making excuses for Hernandez's illegal drug purchase, distribution, and use over a period of years in both the United States and MLB. He was granted immunity from prosecution by cutting a deal to testify in a federal probe and name other MLB users. That's what's called a rat.
Today in MLB Keith Hernandez would face mandatory suspension, loss of salary and all sorts of requirements in order to be reinstated.
He could also face criminal charges for distribution and strong blacklash from teammates, fans and media for causing the team great harm in his absence.
And his help in winning the 1986 World Series tittle never would have happened had his 1 year suspension for the entire 1986 season not been reduced to 10% salary cut and 200 hours of community service, attendance in drug programs, and drug testing. MLB caved.
FROM THE NY TIMES: 3/1/86
"The one-year suspensions were handed out to those players who Mr. Ueberroth said had not only used drugs themselves but had also ''in some fashion facilitated the distribution of drugs in baseball.'' He said these players had shared drugs with teammates and in some cases introduced players to drug dealers.
In addition to Mr. Hernandez and Mr. Berra, the players given one-year suspensions were Joaquin Andujar, Dave Parker, Jeff Leonard, Lonnie Smith and Enos Cabell."
I doubt fans would be forgiving if Jacob Degrom and Michael Conforto were suspended for a portion of 2019 for drug use and were called to testify in federal court.
ARTICLE - LA Times
" Mets' Hernandez Admits 'Massive' Use of Cocaine
September 06, 1985|Associated Press
PITTSBURGH — New York Mets first baseman Keith Hernandez testified today that he used "massive amounts of cocaine" during the second half of the 1980 season and played a game under the influence of the drug.
He described that time as one of "romance" between baseball players and the drug.
"I think it was the love-affair years . . . it was pretty prevalent," Hernandez said of cocaine use by players.
Testifying at a federal trial of a suspected drug dealer, Hernandez said he didn't remember which game he played while drugged--only that it was in the second half of the season.
"That was the year I was crazy," Hernandez said. "That was the year of my greatest use."
He said he began to worry about the effect the drug was having on him after he lost 10 pounds and awoke once with a bloody nose and the shakes.
It was like a demon in me," he said.
Hernandez said he has not used cocaine since being traded to the Mets on June 15, 1983.
He also said he believes that 1980 was the year of the greatest use of cocaine in baseball. When questioned about his grand jury testimony that 40% of major leaguers were using cocaine that year, Hernandez said, "I may be grossly wrong . . . it's declined extremely since 1980."
He attributed that to the "tremendous impact" on players of the jailing of four Kansas City Royals on drug-related charges in 1983.
Hernandez was the lead-off witness in the second day of testimony at the trial of Curtis Strong, a former clubhouse cook for the Philadelphia Phillies who is accused of distributing cocaine.
He indicated that his drug use may have been responsible for the Cardinals trading him to the Mets in June, 1983.
Hernandez said Manager Whitey Herzog earlier that season told a team meeting that he suspected three players on the championship team were using cocaine and asked them to come forward. Hernandez said that although there was a threat of a suspension or a trade in Herzog's demand, "no one came forward in a week. Nothing came of it."
Lonnie Smith testifies. Part III, Page 1.
----
BTW, PED's are also addictive and can cause death.
You make good points here, Longtime, but they have no bearing on mine, which you apparently have misread. To repeat:
ReplyDelete1) Cocaine does not improve performance, and that was Keith's addiction, not PEDs.
2) His Cocaine use was a major reason why Herzog was anxious to deal him away. No way would he have become a Met otherwise, and certainly not for the mediocrities we gave up in return.
Bill metsiac
ReplyDeleteI understand your support of Hernandez for what he did as a Met, but the central point here is whether the behavior he engaged in for years disqualifies him from the Hall of Fame which includes his time with the Cardinals.
On the merits - which includes character - I say he should be disqualified. If not for using, he might have been a better player during his using years - and by distributing and/or introducing players to drug dealers, he contributed to compromising his teammates and/or other players.
Many years have passed since he played and he's a changed man who has also built a very distinguished career as an analyst - a very knowledgeable and entertaining one who also engages baseball audiences about life.
If he were considered in totality - player and broadcaster, and as person whose changed from his drug abusing ways, and has become very introspective, I think I would be on board with that if the ugly part of his past is also included in his Hall bio along with Hernandez statement about that.
I'm neither supporting him nor saying he should be in the HOF. My 2 points were simple and unequivocal, regardless of what you choose to read into them.
Delete