Spring Training starts in a few weeks and to hear most
people tell it the Mets are nearly out of money yet still have needs to address
in terms of the roster. The question is
one of priorities. Let’s play GM and put
yourself in Brodie Van Wagenen’s very expensive shoes. What would you do between now and Opening
Day?
Starting Rotation
While you can certainly make the case the Mets have a
dominant rotation, the fact remains that three of the five are coming off
injuries and four of the five have injury history. By the numbers, the collective 3.54 ERA of
the starters would good enough for fourth in the majors last year and if you
believe the 2nd half of Zack Wheeler is for real, then 2019 should
be even better. Even the much-maligned
Jason Vargas pitched credibly in September over a 6 start stretch, delivering
below 4.00 which is what they expected in 2018 when they signed him to be a 5th
starter. However, given the injury
histories of everyone not named Jacob deGrom many feel it would be prudent to
have a credible 6th starter ready to go.
As it stands right now, you do have some in-house options,
but none fill you with a lot of confidence.
Corey Oswalt and Chris Flexen have had some minor league success but
thus far haven’t shown much in their brief major league trials. The somewhat older Drew Gagnon has failed
miserably in trials with the Brewers, Angels and Mets at the big league level,
but has shown some success in the minors.
(Personally, I think his spot on the 40-man roster should be up for
grabs as it’s unlikely he’ll put it together at age 29). A few other additions to the staff like
Hector Santiago and Kyle Gowdy are not likely going to replace even the quality
of a Jason Vargas. Seth Lugo absolutely
flourished in a bullpen role last year but had an ERA over 4.00 as a
starter. Why create two problems by weakening
the bullpen and not necessarily improving the rotation. Consequently, many think the Mets need to
reach out to acquire a more credible emergency starter.
Outfield
With the acquisition of Keon Broxton many thought the Mets
added a highly competent defensive whiz which some felt was somewhat redundant
since Juan Lagares is already on the roster.
Neither has proven to have enough of a stick to be handed the starting
role. Brandon Nimmo and Michael Coneforto
are most definitely penciled in for 150 or more games per year (assuming
health). Then there’s Yoenis Cespedes
who will at some point be back (though you have to plan for him to miss all of
2019 instead of relying on hope as the previous regime had done).
So the question the Mets must face is whether they plan to
go defense first with one of the two stellar options at the sacrifice of
offense, or do they honestly think Jeff McNeil who has never logged an inning
of major league time in the OF can suddenly transform himself into a capable
regular in order to get his bat into the lineup? With the arrivals of Robinson Cano and Jed
Lowrie plus the final year of Todd Frazier will otherwise make ABs hard for
McNeil to find.
Personally I think there’s still a breakup of the infield
logjam about to occur which will help one of McNeil or Frazier get more steady
playing time. That still leaves a
question about the outfield.
Bullpen
Right now going into the 2019 season the Mets have some
names written in ink, including newcomer Edwin Diaz, returning Jeurys Familia
and breakthrough man Seth Lugo. In all
likelihood the next tier would include Robert Gsellman, Daniel Zamora and Drew
Smith. Assuming they go with a 7-man pen
there’s still one opening but a great many of the other options have done
nothing to distinguish themselves. Minor
league contract signee Luis Avilan has a 3.09 ERA for his major league career
would seem to me to be the front runner for that spot, particularly because he
would be a second lefty after Zamora.
Some want the Mets to pursue Adam Ottavino or other more
proven options. While a stronger pen helps the starters, I’m
totally not sold on Ottavino who, for his career, has a 3.68 ERA. To be fair, he pitched most of his innings
for Colorado which, for all intents and purposes, is kind of like the PCL when
it comes to hitters being at an advantage at Coors Field. He’s 33 and looking to cash in on his
sensational 2.6 WAR season. Personally,
I think that the man would want not only a huge payday but also a certain
guarantee of work. With Diaz, Familia
and Lugo ahead of him, I don’t know that the Mets could give him the number of
innings he’s likely seeking.
My Priorities
I would go for a stellar hitter to play the outfield with
Nimmo or Conforto shifting to CF assuming the hypothetical hitter is only
capable of playing a corner position. If Cespedes returns earlier than expected, that's a wonderful problem to have. I
would fund it by paying down Juan Lagares and/or Todd Frazier’s contracts so
that even half of both would open up an extra $9 million to spend on this
outfielder. I am confident in Avilan
assuming the final spot in the pen. I
can’t see bringing in a 6th starter unless you are planning to
convert Vargas into the second lefty in the pen. If you do that, then it might be a fight
between Smith and Avilan for that final spot in the pen.
How about you?
Mickey Robinson commented yesterday with a great plan. Sign Machado and Gio, move Frazier and Vargas, eating some $$. McNeil can play OF.
ReplyDeleteAs Mickey said, great starting, very potent offense, solid pen. World Series potential. I agree.
And, of course, if Cespedes does not return in 2019, we have our secret weapon: Tim Tebow!
Tim Tebow would be Kris Benson II. People would watch his games in the hopes of glimpsing his better half.
ReplyDeleteWho doesn't think the world of Gio? If BMW can just burn rubber on any of the frazier, lagares, darnau, vargas contracts, with some dominic smith nitro thrown in the mix!
ReplyDeleteMorning
ReplyDeleteWe all agree on needs... OF RP SP5
IMO, teams should always look inward first for needs
and I believe they will with Avilan.
I expect Vargas to get ST and April to show he is worth his contract. Past that, I see David Peterson sepping in. IMO, he is both seasoned and ready for this.
As for OF, the McNeil experiment would look like one step below Duda in the corner. I am happy to start off the season with 2 defensive gems in center. Trust me. It will win games.
Mack, we have to look for creative ways to get McNeil's .388-at-home bat into a lineup that, while changed since 2018, still only hit .210 at home other than McNeil. Hitting leads to winning. Hitting leads to guys like deGrom getting runs needed to win - remember, he was amazingly 4-6, 1.54 in 16 starts at home. Hit for him at home and he would have gone 9-3 in those games instead. Defense is helpful, hitting more so.
ReplyDeletePeterson? I sure hope he can rocket forward this season and be ready, perhaps, by mid season. I can never figure out why it takes so long for talented guys to climb the ladder - figure out what needs to be refined, and refine it. Should not take long.
If someone told me, for instance, that I needed to get my curve a little sharper and not so much over the middle of the plate, I should know that already, because I threw those pitches myself - and spend the whole off season refining it.
Tim Tebow AND Ms. Universe? He'll be called up this year, trust me.
ReplyDeleteTom -
ReplyDeleteI agree that McNeil needs 2019 at-bats, but I will be surprised to see them come in the outfield. Nimmo and Conforto will be corner fixtures so do we actually substitute a defensive star (either one) with an untested player?
I didn't sign all the infielders, There has to be an infield plan in the making.
Tebow and McNeil in the same outfield? Wow.
Mack, Tebow will be player/manager when they fire Callaway at mid season, my boldest prediction to date! He will take a few weeks before inserting himself in the clean up spot in the line up.
ReplyDeleteHe will also replace Eli Manning next fall. Nothing that he can't do.