One thing that was a highly pleasant surprise for the Mets
fans in 2019 was the high level of production they got from their bats. We all know about the exploits of Pete
Alonso, Michael Conforto, J.D. Davis, Jeff McNeil, Amed Rosario and others. Often, however, that offensive output came at
the expense of defense which, in turn, has a great many folks beating the drums
to improve the defense up the middle.
The problem, of course, is that stellar defensive players
often are not nearly as adept with a bat in their hands. Juan Lagares, Tomas Nido and others are good
examples of this one-way talent issue.
If the Mets actually were trotting out Yoenis Cespedes to go along with
Michael Conforto and someone else in the outfield, you could make the case that
you could withstand a defensive minded centerfielder and catcher.
The problem is that health of Cespedes and Lowrie are not
even well known enough by their own general manager that he can comment as to
what can be expected from them or when they will put on a uniform, capable of
playing regularly. Consequently, if the season started tomorrow,
you would see more combinations of J.D. Davis and Dominic Smith playing out of
position in the outfield with Brandon Nimmo and/or Michael Conforto in
centerfield. (This conjecture presumes Jeff
McNeil would be inserted at the Todd Frazier/Jed Lowrie spot at 3B).
In 2020 there are a number of contracts coming off the
books, including Jed Lowrie, Yoenis Cespedes, Wilson Ramos, Justin Wilson and others. That means a lot of money will be available
in the future, but right now it’s sunk into the current payroll.
The Mets minor league system is somewhat barren of
positional prospects other than shortstops, so it might make sense for the
front office to explore how to address some of these future issues now to help
with not just 2020, but beyond.
Coincidentally, the Chicago Cubs have allegedly considered
breaking up the core of offensive players on their roster, including putting
Kris Bryant and Kyle Schwarber on the trading block. While both are certainly enticing offensive
players, there is another who’s rumored to be available that I would target
instead.
27-year-old catcher Willson Contreras is a slightly better
than average defensive backstop. His
pitch framing skills are not elite, but he is pretty good when it comes to fielding
his position. More importantly, once
Ramos is gone, there is no one who looks ready to stake a claim for the Mets
catching position.
The Cubbies would rightfully ask for a lot for Contreras,
though probably not quite as much as the Marlins wanted for J.T. Realmuto. Contreras has bounced between the plate and
LF while playing part time over his four seasons in the bigs. Last year in just 360 ABs he hit 24 HRs,
drove in 64 and batted .272. In 2018 he
had a down year with the bat, hitting just .249 with 10 HRs and 54 RBIs, but in
2017 he hit .276 with 21 HRs and 74 RBIs in 428 ABs. It would be reasonable to assume he’s a lock
for 25 HRs on a full time basis. His
career average of .263 is respectable as well.
More importantly, he is arbitration eligible for the first time and not
a free agent until 2023. Trading for Contreras
would enable you to trade Ramos, free up his $10.25 million salary and solidify
your catching for the next two years.
What would it take to get him? Ah, there’s the rub. The Cubbies are pretty stacked offensively. If it took a J.D. Davis as part of a deal to
land him would you do it? I’d certainly
have to consider it given that the Mets don’t really have a place to play him. Ditto Dominic Smith. The problem is that Smith alone would not get
it done and even Davis alone might make the Cubs ask for more given the dearth
of catching options in the majors.
Contreras delivered 3.1 WAR last year which is mighty impressive.
The trade would indeed improve the Mets defensively via addition
by subtraction and free up money to address other issues assuming you could
find a taker for Ramos. The Mets do have
a third year option for $10 million but catchers generally do not age well and
Ramos has spent a large chunk of his career fighting injuries. Selling a year too soon might make
sense.
Interesting scenario.
ReplyDeleteThis organization has had a miserable record developing MLB caliber catchers. Who was their last good catcher thru the system?
It is a sad statement to make that the current higher level catchers (Sanchez, Nido, and Mazeika) barely feel like their career peaks could be as # 2 catchers - maybe.
And the lower minors ones, being so far from the majors (at least 2022) could run into injuries or whatever else in the interim.
So the Mets may want to swallow hard and deal for Contreras.
They could try to get a lesser back up to avoid a costly trade for Contreras.
Mortgage the house for Grandal
ReplyDeleteReese, if I were the Mets, I would consider this move, a lot. Nido is out of options. Sanchez and Mazeika are Rule 5 draft eligible. The Mets have a number of other Rule 5 draft eligible players this year and ones that will be Rule 5 draft eligible next year. Of course, not all will get picked, but if the Mets can swing a 3 for 1 trade for Contreras, it would free up roster spots for free agents and the Rule 5ers.
ReplyDeleteAs usual, I am late to the game, so I wonder if anyone will read this and comment back. But my approach behind the plate matches Mack's but it doesn't break the bank.
ReplyDeleteSign Grandal- 4yrs/$68 mil, backloaded. $10MM in 2029, $19MM for next 3.
Trade Ramos (-9.25MM) preferable to Texas for Palumbo & Montero (welcome home)
Sign Maldinado- 2 yrs.$4 mil, $1.5MM in 2020, $2.5MM in 2021.
Net cost to Mets for 2020: $2.25 million. A major bargain to both improve offensively and greatly upgrade defense up the middle. And even if we can't get Palumbo in a deal for Ramos, there are a number of very good relievers who could be gotten that would slot right into the pen and solidify it.
BTW, Hi guys. Great to see you here. Hey Tom.
ReplyDeleteMack, hope you and your family are ok. I miss you guys.