Pages

12/12/20

Mike's Mets - Beware the Dreaded Dombrowski

 


By Mike Steffanos December 11, 2020 


As if things aren't tough enough for Mets fans who are still left longing for a real impact free agent signing, now Ken Davidoff of the Post is describing the Phillies hiring of Dave Dombrowski to run things in the City of Brotherly Love as a "haymaker" delivered right in the schnoz of Steve Cohen's stated mission of winning a title with the Mets. Apparently, fans of the team like myself should now quake in fear of what this hiring means for all of our hopes. So, thanks to Ken Davidoff, Dave Dombrowski joins the long line of boogeymen that the New York media utilizes to beat Mets fans over the head. In his honor, I have included the picture of my favorite fictional Dombrowski, Louis, who I'm pretty sure anyone much short of retirement age will need to Google. You're welcome.

I remember when Dombrowski's name came up as a potential candidate for the Mets PBO job. I didn't think there was much of a chance he would be handed the keys. To be honest, I wouldn't have been in favor of that, despite all of his previous success. This excerpt from Tom Verducci's column in Sports Illustrated on Dombrowski's firing by the Red Sox pretty much says it all in describing the reasons for my lack of enthusiasm for the guy:

 ...the reasons the Red Sox hired Dombrowski no longer existed. What they need now, at least in the vision of owner John Henry, is a process-oriented architect who can steer the franchise efficiently through a difficult transition toward its next championship team. That person was not the 63-year-old Dombrowski.

"Dave was the kind of guy who didn’t have much a process," said one source familiar with the team’s thinking. "He is very good at making decisions right now based on instincts and advice. John likes a more process-oriented approach. And based on where the team is right now–the next couple of years could be rough–they don’t trust him to make those decisions."...

...The farm system, thinned by the trades Dombrowski made, is one of the leanest in baseball.

I've written recently about the Phillies' so-far unsuccessful attempt to tank themselves back into relevance. Dombrowski's forte has been going all in on winning now, not building something sustainable. Dombrowski has won with the Marlins and Red Sox, but the aftermath of his tenure in both places was someone else having to come in and be the architect of the next championship. I'm genuinely curious to see how he proceeds without much of a prospect base from which to make trades.

In many ways, I think the Phillies are in the same place as the Mets, needing to add to their current roster to compete now while trying to fix the deficiencies in their scouting and development to compete going forward. The description from Verducci's article of "a process-oriented architect" seems to be what's required for both franchises. So, essentially, what they are asking Dombrowski is outside of his demonstrated wheelhouse. Can he do it? Maybe. Is he the best guy for the job? Good question.

Either way, my purpose here isn't to trash the Phillies' decision to hire Dave Dombrowski. He's enjoyed enough success in different places to be given the benefit of the doubt. Besides, I'm not a Phillies fan, and I really don't care all that much about who they hire. Whether that executive seems to me to be the right person for the job is immaterial. Going further, I'm not even hoping for Philadelphia to get an incompetent leader, even though that seems counterintuitive for a fan of another team in the same division. I promise that it's not some sort of false bravado.

One of the lessons that I've learned from a lifetime of following this sport is that what your team does is much, much more important than what its competitors do. If your team is well-run and makes mostly smart decisions you're going to have a decent shot at winning, even if the competition in your division is pretty strong. Especially these days, where more than a single playoff team can come out of a division. Moreover, I think better competition makes a team better — both in forcing them to build a better roster in the offseason and getting used to being pushed when they face the best teams in the postseason.

Continue reading by clicking here. 

No comments:

Post a Comment