Pages

1/7/22

Reese Kaplan -- Figuring Out the Infielders on the Roster


If you're obsessively reading about the players the Mets could or should add to the roster if and when the lockout comes to an end, you're likely seeing names like Kris Bryant, Matt Chapman and even Trevor Story popping up as a possible "necessary" additions to the team.  You even occasionally hear other names added to the list, but each time I see this topic arise I can't help but think about the players currently on the team and what will be done with them.


There's an awful lot of press about the Mets selling low on Jeff McNeil after his disastrous 2021 season which would diminish his value despite a low salary and an upper tier track record of hitting above .300.  He is an adequate fielder on the infield and previously was thought to be a part of the new core of players around whom the Mets would build for the future.  Last year's incident with Francisco Lindor has been well publicized, but a shoving match (or even a fistfight) between two teammates usually isn't a mandatory summon to action demanding an immediate trade.  


Then there's the addition of Eduardo Escobar who in theory is a replacement for Jonathan Villar from last year's team.  Escobar earns a lot more money (nearly triple what Villar got), is 3 years older and holds a lifetime batting average 2 points lower.  He has bounced between the White Sox, Twins, Diamondbacks and Brewers throughout his eleven year career.  What does stand out is his eventual regular amount of playing time since 2018 during which the little man (merely 5'10") turned into an actual power hitter averaging 35 HRs per 162 games played.  He is capable of playing 2nd base, shortstop and 3rd base.


Another name not really considered part of the Mets future is J.D. Davis.  The minor deal that Brodie Van Wagenen made with the Astros to bring him to New York.  At first it looked like a steal when Davis turned in a first year campaign for the Mets in which he batted .307 while slugging 22 HRs in under 500 ABs.  Then came the COVID-shortened 2020 season during which Davis' average dipped under .250 while only hitting 6 HRs.  Last year fighting injuries he was up to .285 but hit just 5 HRs.  The power is there for sure, but hand injuries make it difficult to grip a bat properly to take a home run swing.  Most people who are Mets fans are ready to give up on him entirely.  


The most conspicuous name with uncertainty is PED poster child Robinson Cano.  The man is due to earn a total of $24 million in 2022 and 2023 for a totally unknown level of production. We're all aware of his horrific 2019 arrival in New York with a stat line of just .256 with only 13 HRs and 39 RBIs.  That then was followed by an outstanding 2020 when he hit .316 with 10 HRs and 30 RBIs in about 1/3 of a season's worth of ABs.  Then came 2021 where he was put on the shelf for his second known violation of the league's anti-PED policies.  Were his impressive 2020 numbers the result of what he apparently injected or was it a return to his allegedly natural level of talent?  Right now no one knows what to do with Cano and you generally don't cut guys set to earn $48 million by contract.  On the flip side, if he is a member of the Mets, you generally don't bench guys earning that kind of salary either.  

There are other players in the mix, too, like Francisco Lindor and Luis Guillorme, but their roles are already solidly defined.  What the Mets need to do if they are indeed hell bent on adding more infielders to the team is figure out what to do with the ones they already have.  McNeil and Escobar are certainly quality players.  Davis is a question mark due to his health and Cano is a question mark due to his decision making.  Paying a new player north of $20 million per season on the surface is not a smart move until other actions are taken.

13 comments:

  1. The addition of Swiss army knife Escobar gives us tremendous depth leverage... plus the emergence of Cano down south might mean one more productive year at second.

    5 years ago today Mrs. Mack was diagnosed with Stage 3 Thyroid cancer.

    We are on our way to her last blood check before being declared 5 years cancer free.

    You can beat this if it is caught early.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great news. Hope her future remains bright.

      Delete
  2. Exactly the reason the Mets didn’t go after Baez. The Mets aren’t lacking of players, they are lacking of a plan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Real cool news Mack, glad to hear that. Wish her well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mack, that's great news on Mrs. Mack. Send her my congratulations.

    Coincidentally, my wife has one of those very big milestone birthdays today.

    Back tp the article, Mr. Eppler and others have to keep an eye on when Vientos and Baty will be ready, since both could add into the IF mix. But with the enormous checkbook in hand, one never knows if Cohen bulls his way to signing one of the remaining stars noted in Reese's first paragraph.

    HAPPY Friday from somewhat snowy Long Island - first real snowfall of 2022.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They really don't have to rush either Vientos or Baty this year.

      Me?

      I would elevate BOTH to Syracuse and play Vientos exclusively in a corner outfield position so both are ready to start OD 2023.

      Delete
  5. Mack, that is wonderful news...very happy for you.

    I also agree with you on our depth pieces. McNeil can play 4 positions, Escobar 3 positions, Davis and Smith, 2 positions and in the DH rotation.

    I believe they have to pass on the players you mentioned and stay the course with what we have. I know I've said this many times they must resist the temptation to sign Chris Bryant. The above players fill the same roll only better. His offensive and defensive numbers are on the decline. If you sign him long term you only block the younger players

    Just spend the remaining money on pitching, pitching and more pitching.

    Gus, I do believe they are starting to formulate the beginning of a plan. I love these 2-3 year signings. By 2024 we will have 3 or 4 position players and 2 pitchers on our roster...hopefully resetting the payroll tax. Hopefully we will be drafting well and we are on our way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We all sometimes forget what it's like to struggle with a disease or injury. Those anniversaries are doubly significant because it means defeat of whatever it was ailing you and hindering your basic lifestyle. Send congratulations to your fighting better half, Mack.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great news about your wife, Mack! I hope her health issues are gone forever! LGMM!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great news Mack and give her our best. I remember having lunch with you and your wife a few years back in a place off I-95 she's a wonderful lady and yes age does catch up with us all sooner or later but we keep trying to push it off as long as we can.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 3 seasons have come and gone since Mr Cano has been under the Mets' umbrella - due to various reasons, he has put together essentially 1 season's worth of performance: 156 games, 551 at bats, 37 doubles, 23 HRs, 69 RBIs, .275. Now, if he could have done that much over each season individually, the trade would be a resounding success. He had 9 pre-Mets seasons of 156 games or more.

    The question is will he get into even another 156 games, total, over the last 2 seasons of his contract as a Met. I'd be quite surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mack - great news. Cancer sucks and beating it is sweet. Best wishes for continued health for the both of you!

    ReplyDelete