By Mike Steffanos
When the Mets dropped Sunday night's finale in Atlanta, a friend of mine who is a Mets fan sent me a two-word text, "it's over." I wanted to answer back at some length but, not feeling particularly eloquent at that moment, I replied, "not even close," and promised to elaborate further when I finished bandaging my feelings. Well, it took a couple of days, but here are some thoughts on why the club's face plant in Atlanta signified the end of nothing more than the club's chances to grab a rare NL East title.
Look, it sucked that the Mets put up such a lame effort to hold onto their division lead over the weekend. Any attempts to sugarcoat that would be ludicrous. I wouldn't waste anyone's time in that manner. I haven't been this disappointed with a Mets ball club in a long time. I honestly wasn't as disappointed with the 2015 Mets when they lost the World Series, because they had clearly overachieved to get there. Not that the Mets put up a particularly epic fight against the Royals in that series, but at least they made a bit of noise before heading off into the good night.
Sunday night after the game ended was a time of deep misery. It seems almost incalculably cruel to watch your team get meekly swept in their most important series in years and be forced to watch that happen on ESPN's garbage telecast and have it be against the Braves and have it happen in Atlanta. And I'm not here to gloss over any of that. However, nothing at all ended on Sunday night beyond realistic hopes of winning the division.
In my opinion, one of the truly hopeless days in my entire 50+ years of following the Mets happened 14 years ago, on September 28, 2008. It was the final year of Shea Stadium. In the final game, the Mets, for the second year in a row, lost to an awful Marlins team to complete a consecutive September collapse to the Phillies. That wasn't only the end for creaky, smelly, yet still wonderful Shea. It was the end of a short-lived era of success for the club.
the era of the Ruf/Naquin kind of players must end
ReplyDeletethe Mets have the young players to step on
the difference between the Mets and the Braves are THEY PLAY THEIR PROSPECTS when they call them up
Great post, Mike! You put words to that balancing act in my brain between the disappointment of being swept in Atlanta with the realization that 100 wins this year is only the start of building a power for years to come.
ReplyDeleteI hope we can get on a run in the playoffs. It will be difficult - we did not do well against the Padres this year and the Dodgers are next. I also hope that we can deftly maneuver through the roster decisions this winter as so many of this year's players become free agents.
Long live the Mets!
An avoidable division title loss, reminiscent of the Phillies overtaking them a few times very late about 15 years ago - it is a Mets specialty since 1974.
ReplyDeleteThey lost this playing the Pirates and Cubs
DeleteAgree with you Mack.......to a point......they had some bad losses down the stretch (Chicago sweep comes to mind). But, the biggest knock was losing 6 of the last 7 to Atlanta. That was game, set and match, for me.
ReplyDeleteStill, the team has improved 23 games over last year's team, which is close to a 30% improvement! We are also a playoff team for the first time since 2016....both are strong signs of progress, despite how bitter the series in Atlanta was.
If they somehow get past the Padres (who won the season series with the Mets), they would likely have to beat the Dodgers, then the Braves, followed by either Houston or the Yankees in the WS. That's a TALL order and extremely unlikely, this year. Again, I am not giving up, but it's a huge ask.
Instead, I am pleased with the 2022 season and I think the future is bright.
It will be an interesting and BUSY offseason, when the time comes.
Alvarez and Baty might be starters. Escobar a DH. LINdor and Guilorme will be more valuable in no shift baseball. McNeil in LF and hopefully in top half of order. Canha DH and fourth OFer. Nimmo? DeGrom ,if he walks use $s on pitching and maybe Correa,Boegarts or Turner.
ReplyDelete