Pages

11/24/25

Reese Kaplan -- Mets First Transaction Caught Many By Surprise


Well, well, well...we’ve all been awaiting for the first roster changes to take place and suddenly on Sunday evening from out of seemingly nowhere the Mets made a deal sending former first round pick Brandon Nimmo to the Rangers for All Star and Gold Glove second baseman Marcus Semien. 

Before we get into what the trade means for the next set of roster changes, let’s take a look at the finances and age issues involved in this deal.  Nimmo signed a very lucrative contract extension paying him $162 million over the course of eight years.  The salary increased to a rate of $20.5 million in 2024 and continues at that rate up through 2030.  What that means is the Mets moved a financial obligation of $102.5 million by peddling away their starting left fielder.

Statistically Nimmo in an average season is good for 21 HRs, 70 RBIs and a .262 batting average.  Those numbers are good but not great.  He had his best ever season in 2025 when he hit 25 HRs, 92 RBIs and batted the same .262.  The issue with Nimmo has always been injury susceptibility and a decline in his defensive metrics which fell below 0 this past year. 

Semien has had a very solid career that began back in 2013 with the White Sox.  During his time in the majors he has earned three All Star berths, won two Gold Glove awards and has three times finished third in the voting for MVP.  His bat has slowed down the past two years but his WAR rating in 2025 was still superior to what the Mets got from Nimmo.

Financially, Semien earns quite a bit of money.  Right now he is guaranteed to earn $72 million over the next three years.  How much his defense can balance out his offense, but he’s once hit over 40 HRs in a season and twice gotten over the century mark in RBIs.  Given the $30.5 million savings over what is owed to Nimmo, that helps pay for other needs while improving the infield defense with the DP combo now being Lindor and Semien. 

So now the questions arise what happens to the rest of the roster?  Jeff McNeil’s former position of second base is now taken.  Luisangel Acuna and Ronny Mauricio do not yet have open places on the field to demonstrate they are better than they have shown.  Brett Baty and Mark Vientos are still around and of these five people may be more desirable in trades for their low salaries and offensive potential. 

It also makes everyone begin to wonder who is in the Mets outfield?  For now you have Juan Soto out there on his own assuming Tyrone Taylor is a 4th outfielder.  You could slot Jeff McNeil into left field while they figure out who could take over in center field but that approach reduces the number of long balls and RBIs. 

Obviously this trade is the first of many changes sure to happen, though no one can identify who in free agency or other trades might be headed to Citifield.  Still, with the improved defense and salary savings it seems to be a decent deal for the Mets and not a bad one for the Rangers.

24 comments:

  1. IMO

    you can't rate this trade until you see how many other moves are made in the off-season

    the mets currently have too many second basemen... something has to be dome about this

    I will rate the off season acquisitions the day after the trading/signing ends

    For now, I love the additional emphasis on defense and this guy can make Pete Alonso look like a much better first baseman... if...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The savings aren’t really savings because they are spending $6MM more per year as they are including $1MM a year to pay for Nimmo (would a team ever make a trade with the Mets without asking for money back?) and in three years whatever money Simien is making will just go elsewhere. What they are saving is time. Time for the deal to come off the books.

    Not in love with the trade but that’s what happens when you give no trade clauses. Bad enough they gave Nimmo a great deal - and good for him, it’s not my money - but the no trade clause made trading him much tougher and gave teams negotiating leverage knowing the player can just veto it. A lesson BVW didn’t know when trading for Cano to the only place Cano would agree to go.

    Sometimes shaping a roster takes time. You move Nimmo’s deal; you see if Alonso can be signed or slot Vientos to first base (he is working out there during the winter). Baty doesn’t need to take reps at second base any longer. Acuna can become a super sub. McNeil can fill in until Benge is ready…. While some people are yelling “Tatis” and others are yelling “Tucker” neither one of these moves are a certainty. The only certainty I have is a hard “HELL NO” to Bellinger and his inflated stats at Yankee Stadium while completely sucking on the road. I’m dying to see the sucker that falls for him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You do have to question the future of Ronny Mauricio

      Delete
  3. The Nimmo Era ends. The remake is underway in earnest now. I did not see this trade coming.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have alway sung the Nimmo has to go movements so to me addition by subtraction. Great guy, good Met despite my feelings, average ball player.
    Anyone who doesn’t believe that winning this trade by not having the last 2 years of nimmo doesn’t understand long term or short term necessity of this team

    This core needed to be changed
    Mission accomplished

    The DH I open for Pete Soto maybe Lindor
    Mission accomplished

    Nimmo was a anchor
    I definitely am content (not happy) with the trade as I never would have resigned nimmo in the first place

    Now time for stern to put his imprints on this team

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have read a lot on X this morning about how much they loved Nimmo

      Love doesn't win rings

      And Stearns is paid to win

      Any questions?

      Delete
  5. If Stearns is paid to win then he's overpaid as his team in two seasons at the top hasn't won anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree Reese

      So far, he hasn't produced a winner, winner yet.

      All he did on the Soto sign was eat a tomahawk across the table at Peter Luger's

      this might be a winnier winner, but it's too early to see. I do like the fact that it is only a 3-year deal. Potential for only two bad seasons (sic)

      Delete
    2. Peter Lugar's does not serve tomahawks. But, their porterhouse is worth the yrip.

      Delete
  6. I am in agreement with Eddie from Corona. I would never have signed him to an extension. I actually wanted to trade him a year early and got back something for him then.
    I love this deal, especially because of the defensive Upside it provides and gets rid of one of the log jam at DH going forward.
    Was he a great guy in the clubhouse and the team first player yes he was, but Semien supposedly is as well, so that should be even.
    Semien Is older I believe they are both aging at the same rate baseball wise so I’m happy don’t have three years left on this contract. Also, I hope he doesn’t have a no trade clause because he can be moved later on As Well.
    I can’t wait for the other shoe To drop and unlike tom I am a big fan acquiring Bellinger To replace Pete And Wouldn’t Rule out a atati or Machado trade. Or Sandy Alcantra type trade For all the young and field that we have.
    Semien contract timeline also works well with Elian Penas taking over SS and moving Lindor to second base in 3 years?
    Tatis, Bellinger, Machado and Tucker are all Defensive upgrades, especially Tatis. I would only spend top dollar on two way players which all of them are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry shouldn’t read
      I’m happy there is only 3 years left on his contract
      And
      Atati is supposed to read Tatis.
      Sorry, I forgot to proofread

      Delete
    2. I never forgetting to profreed

      Delete
  7. First, like Nimmo & wish him well. Second, this was an Aldersen extension & would have crippled them over time. Had to be made. 3. Semien is a safe bet - exceptional defense, hard worker, good speed, some pop. Most importantly, opens up OF & clears space as the core ages (won’t clog the DH role). He’s a solid player now so worth enough to pull off this trade. 4. Forget about the cap next year. They will be going all-in with a combo of your & younger players (Semien is the exception).

    Imagine on OF of Soto (27-LF), Benge (23-CF), Tucker (28-RF). That’s a HUGE upgrade to the core.

    Baty, Lindor, Semien, Pete(?), Alvarez =very strong If (Williams - if not traded) as utility stud

    Need SP1 & BP work as well.

    Just one potential scenario.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Never the biggest fan because of his poor defense and noodle arm. Felt it was ridiculous to give him 8 years when he wouldn't have gotten 5 on the open market.

    Like Mack said you have to see what other moves they make to really gage the trade. Also, there were some underlying issues that are being whispered throughout the internet. There must have been problems for him to wave his no trade clause.

    I have to agree with Gus on Bellinger. While a major defensive upgrade to Nimmo, why would you think of signing him long term at 30m per year.

    Zozo, check out his home and away splits. His numbers were Yankee stadium boosted. He will hit .250/20/70 as a Met. Please say no.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bellinger can play multiple positions at a high level. That should be able to age well over the next 5-6 seasons. Also he is younger than Alonso.
      I like that versatility.
      Also, Alonzo would never have had that season last year if he wasn’t batting behind Soto.

      Delete
    2. Tucker first prize, Bellinger 2nd prize.

      Delete
    3. Semiannual will cover much more space towards first

      Lindor will hug the 2B bag

      Both their speed will create electric double plays

      And

      It will make Vientos' job much easier to field at first

      Delete
  9. Tucker is the prize: 5+ WAR, 28, hole glove defense, rifle arm, premium power bat. Imagine: Lindor, Soto, Pete, Tucker… followed by a
    Some combo of: Semien, Alvarez, Baty, Benge, 1B/DH.

    Pretty strong.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tucker Fangraphs WAR: 21-23 4.9 per year; 24-4.2; 25 4.5. In his prime. Next five years… Soto, Pete, Tucker… oh with Lindor leading off

    ReplyDelete
  11. For all those who crave Tucker, just some food for thought, Nimmo had a better offensive year than Tucker.

    In 5 years, Tucker becomes Nimmo at twice the price, with much better defense.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tucker had 4.2 WAR & was injured last year. Acg 4.7 WAR with much better defense, more power & much stronger are & three years younger than Nimmo.

    ReplyDelete
  13. RV, I actually agree with you, but I don't think I have the stomach for another 10 year contract. Just imagine Soto, Lindor and Tucker in their late 30's making 130m between them.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am going to say that this is a nothing burger up until the now open LF is filled again. At that point, this trade can be re-evaluated.

    ReplyDelete