While a great many of us think we know a lot more about how
to run a successful baseball franchise than do the people who are being paid to
do so, the fact is that there are some difficult choices that will always leave
the decisionmaker open to second guessing. On Monday was one of those occasions when you
watched the Mets decide who to retain on the 40-man roster, who to protect from
the upcoming Rule V draft and who not to protect. With a precious five spots available on the
roster the Mets chose to shield just four from being exposed to changing
teams.
On the surface, that was a little surprising since in the
lower minors the Mets have some talent that was worthy of consideration such as
Adonis Uceta. The calculated risk is
that players who have not been above the A-ball level would likely not be
picked by another club as it is a reasonable expectation they would not last
the entire season on the receiving club’s major league roster.
Of course, the flip side to that seemingly logical argument
is that they chose to give one of those 40-man roster spots to A-ball hurler
Gershon Bautista. Here I think there was
more afoot, primarily not wanting to wind up with egg on your face by losing a
guy who put up some pretty gaudy numbers after coming over from the Red Sox as
part of the Addison Reed deal.
Tyler Bashlor is a bit more understandable as he did
actually spend some time in Binghamton and is two years older and ostensibly
more experienced than Bautista. He also
had a superior season overall, so there are no arguments from anyone for
choosing to protect him.
Luis Guillorme has drawn parallels to Rey Ordonez for his
magical glove. He did hit well in the
Arizona Fall League -- .289 to be precise -- which is actually right on par
with his minor league career average of .285.
The problem with his game has been his anemic ability to drive the
ball. He has just 2 home runs in over
2000 plate appearances. He had one
outlier year in 2015 for Savannah when he stole 18 bases, but he has been at 6
or fewer in every other season. As a
comparison, Ordonez hit just .255 in the minors so perhaps there is a little
more potential for a solid career.
Ordonez won 3 straight Gold Gloves and lasted 9 seasons. I cruelly compared him to Ruben Tejada who
was a .273 minor league hitter who, like Guillorme, stole some bases once upon
a time but then seemingly gave up that part of his game. He did manage to club 23 home runs over 2500
minor league plate appearances, so he was Ruthian by comparison to
Guillorme. Still, I can understand the
logic of having a potential Gold Glove fielder who can offensively keep his head above
water as a potential player in the future or a trade chip down the road.
It also makes perfect sense to protect your minor league
pitcher of the year, Corey Oswalt, who put together a sensational season for
Binghamton. When you turn in an entire
season with an ERA of just 2.28 that’s a no-brainer.
However, for a club that is seemingly forever pinching
pennies, it would seem a good way to economize for the future and to build up
your limited arsenal of trade chips would be to protect people who MIGHT be
part of a long term solution rather than hanging onto those folks who have
already shown that they are likely not.
Towards that end, would outrighting Matt Reynolds or Josh
Smoker or some others on the bubble have been a smarter decision? That way even if an Ucetas or a Mickey Jannis don’t factor into
your future plans in Queens, they’d still be guaranteed to be in the fold for
trades down the road.
Well, there is a silver lining to this puzzling
strategy. The Mets left one 40-man
roster spot open. That means either they
could be scrap heap shopping when the Rule V draft occurs much like they did
when they picked Sean Gilmartin a few years ago and were rewarded with a season
of 50 game appearances and a 2.67 ERA.
Of course, the more exciting aspect of the empty roster slot
is the possibility of signing a free agent.
Don’t think Jake Arrieta or Wade Davis or J.D. Martinez. Still, it will make for some good Hot Stove
fodder until after the December winter meetings and Rule V draft conclude on
December 13th.
So what do you think of how the Mets handled their roster?
Rease you are completely right ... both smoker and Reynolds should have been taken off the 40 man and both Uceta and Jannis should have been protected...
ReplyDeleteWhy send Jannis to the Arizona league? To fail? He did well and now you don’t protect him?
If by chance and with the Mets very likely we suffer another year of rash injuries to the pitchers wouldn’t you want a Jannis who could throw a Ton of innings
Why is Jannis subject to the draft? He was as a FA only 2 years ago or so. Don't players have to be in the system longer than that to be draftable?
ReplyDeleteJannis pitched for St. Lucie and Binghamton in 2015, so he's been in the system three years. Signed just before his 25th birthday as a free agent - after being drafted in 2010 by Tampa and being released - he was able to be protected three years.
DeleteThat should read "signed as..."
ReplyDeleteMy guess is, right now, Reynolds is on the 40 man because he currently is the fifth outfielder on the depth chart
ReplyDeleteBill -
ReplyDeleteI have seen this kind of non decisions before (Uceta, Jannis).
My guess is a trade is in the works.
There might be, but isn't the 40 "frozen" until the draft?
DeleteIf you put Uceta on the 40 man roster, don't Uceta precedent?
ReplyDeleteSorry, some bad, pre-turkey humor. Lest I forget later, Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
I don't buy the 5th outfielder argument, Mack. Would a minor-league deal FA pickup like last year's Desmond Jennings be WORSE than Matt Reynolds?
ReplyDeleteTom -
ReplyDeleteYou have no pre-season turkey humor.
You are all ham.
Bill -
ReplyDeleteI am not sure if your last comment was for me, but, if it was, no one is frozen on the 40 if they are traded away.
I look for 3 player trade for a second baseman sometime in the next 10 days.
Yes, of course trades can be made, but as far as I know, no other prospects can be promoted to the 40 to protect them.
DeleteReese -
ReplyDeleteI agree that there are a 1000 better options than Reynolds as a fifth outfielder, but all I am saying is "I guess" that the Mets mentally have him on their board as the CURRENT fifth outfielder.
This can all change if Reynolds is traded.
Bill-
ReplyDeleteI think the 40-man world is frozen, but not for a particular club.
1.e. the Mets could trade Harvey & Smith for Longaria if TB had space on their 40, but if that trade included a Rule 5 eligible guy (say Jannis), he could not be added to TB's 40 even if they had room.
Right now the Mets have room to obtain some one already on somebody else's 40.
Confusing, but it seems like it won't affect the protected list.
DeleteThanks, Hobie.
Mack, my first cell phone was a ham radio.
ReplyDeleteTom -
ReplyDeleteBreaker, breaker...
What's up, good buddy...not wins or attendance.
ReplyDeleteThis thread ain’t kosher
ReplyDeleteTHe conclusion I draw from Hobie's comment is that not many multi-player deals will take place until after December 13th when the Rule V draft takes place and the clubs are then free to make changes. One-for-one or two-for-one could happen if there was space but bigger deals will be someone's Christmas present.
ReplyDelete