Pages

3/10/21

Reese Kaplan -- Mets Borrowing From Peter to Pay Paul?

 


The news about Jose Martinez’ knee injury isn’t new.  Everyone is aware of his collision with the umpire that caused a torn meniscus and at minimum four months of recovery (if not the whole season).  I always feel bad when a player gets a long-term injury from something that is not a foolhardy effort on his part.  It’s surely not the first time it’s happened, and it won’t be the last.

Stories abound about the prospect of the Mets signing Maikel Franco who is yet unsigned.  He’s one of those free agents still searching for a gig as his play is good but not great and his reputation for defense is rather shoddy.  As a result, no matter what he does with the bat he’s going to be penalized for his glove.  His best year he earned a 1.8 WAR and last year a 1.1 with Kansas City.  In his best season he hit 25 HRs and drove in 88 while hitting .255, but that only got him a 0.6 WAR score. 

As disenchanted as many are with J.D. Davis and his own defensive problems, the fact is he has more power but less of a track record than Franco.  In his entire career he’s had 765 ABs (which is a bit more than one full season), clubbed 33 HRs and drove in 88 while hitting .268.  His best season on the WAR metric was 2019 for the Mets when he hit 22 of those long balls, drove in 57 and batted .307, yet only got a score of 1.0. 

So the question is whether or not Maikel Franco is a good replacement option for Jose Martinez?  Martinez wasn’t exactly a wizard with the glove either, but his bat has been very good for a few years.  He started a bit late in the majors but in a single season would average 16 HRs, 68 RBIs and batting .289 while playing often though not quite full time.  It’s certainly possible that Franco can replace most of that offense at a somewhat lower batting average.

However, step back and take a look at the third base question.  Right now, in addition to J.D. Davis, the Mets also have free agent signee Jonathan Villar and young veteran infielder Luis Guillorme.  Villar has bounced between shortstop, second base and a handful of appearances at third base with even a couple in the outfield.  He does bring decent defense and versatility.  In a given season as a fulltime player he could be expected to deliver 16 HRs, 55 RBIs and a .259 average.  In addition to what he does in the field, he will also swipe 42 bases. 

Guillorme is a defensive whiz who doesn’t offer much in terms of speed or power, but his batting average is improving.  Last season he hit .333 and his minor league average was three times over the .300 mark.  He’s not anyone’s first choice to start every day, but he’s surely a valuable commodity off the bench and in late innings for defensive replacement.

The Mets tend to skew somewhat left-heavy with their hitting, so the desire to have some good right handed options makes sense.  Guillorme is left handed.  Villar is a switch hitter but does most of his work from the left side. 

Last season Franco pulled down just under $3 million by playing for Kansas City after leaving Philadelphia.  As a fulltime player he his .278 with 8 HRs and 38 RBIs in just over 1/3 of a season.  It’s interesting to me that KC did not make any effort to keep him, so perhaps the defensive issues are too much of a red flag. 

While no one has launched a guess as to contract term or rate, it would seem to me he’s not a terrific fit for the Mets unless they intend to bundle J.D. Davis off in a trade somewhere.  He would cost triple the salary for inferior offensive production.  

What am I not seeing here?

12 comments:

  1. My guess, Reese, is that Franco's salary will be low. A lot of bat, coupled with another so-so glove. If cheap, though, count me in...if you get an injury or two, I want to see guys who can hit.

    As I've written about on a few occasions, at the All Star game in 2015, the Mets' bench had several guys who had compiled several hundred at bats to that point and were hitting a combined .180. That's ONE EIGHTY.

    You're not going to get a great fielder and great hitter for cheap, so I prefer a Franco and a crowded offensive roster. I'm good with Franco if the price is right. You sort out the ABs the best you can - but EVERY AT BAT (except, possibly, for Nido) will be quality. Which will lead to tons of runs.

    Bludgeon the opponents into a pulp.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would rather go with Jedd Gyorko or Zach Cosart if they are available? I think they would bring better defense and more versatility.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Honestly I would like to see a lot more of Guillorme. The guy is great defensively and has great plate discipline with few strikeouts and a healthy walk rate. He may not have much power but he will put together a solid AB and the Mets lineup is so stacked already it would not hurt them to keep that glove in with that he does bring.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr too Dallas. He's earned it and these other guys require DFAing someone from the 40 man. Its amazing how hard it is for a player to change peoples thinking after he gets tagged as a backup. Guillorme can play.

      Delete
  4. Is very simple guys. The Mets always want to give failed players from other teams opportunities instead of seeing what they already have inhouse and give them that opportunity.

    Just look at this team. Lots of signings and it is still a bad fielding team. Dom Smith who is looking great again is mostly sitting on the bench instead of sharing 1B and LF.

    If McNeil cannot handle 3B, then put him on 2B and Guillorme at 3B. Aren't they already complaining about bad defense? well? this is how you fix it.
    Getting another lead glove player is not the answer but the "Genius in his own mind" will fix it anyway.

    I still wonder how much I would have enjoyed watching and infield of Rosario 3B, Gimenez SS, Guillorme 2B, and Smith 1B. An outfield of McNeil LF, Springer CF, Conforto RF. JT Realmuto C.

    If you were given a choice, what would you have taken. Lindor on a one year contract or Springer and JT Realmuto signed for the next five years for about 100M less than what it will cost just to extend Lindor?

    Oh well, never fear, we have Sandy at the helm.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like Dallas' idea of going with Luis.

    Why the Mets don't understand this man's talent would be a wild guess.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Remember who else was a backup who couldn't get a break? McNeil.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Viper...I'm sort of with you (although I have no interest in seeing Rosario anymore). I honestly think that Gimenez is going to be a very good player and is massively underrated. I think it's quite possible he puts up a 4-5 WAR season this year for the league minimum. Hopefully Carrasco pans out as he is risky with this various health issues and the success of this trade hinges on him more than Lindor IMO because the Mets could have assessed SS (Lindor & others) this next offseason. As for Springer it would have been great to see him but frankly without confirmation of the DH it would force you to sit Smith or Alonso which minimizes the upgrade he would have brought (at least until 2022). Anyways I know I'm in the minority and maybe I'm not being rational but Lindor did not have a good 2020 campaign and while he was good in 2019 it was also a step down from his elite seasons. I probably have PTSD from Mets moves gone wrong but his 2019-2020 do not exactly scream throw 300m at him to me. I look forward to him proving me wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dallas, with Lindor, I throw out his 2020 and look to the 3 prior seasons where he had around 80 extra base hits, a total only reached once or twice in all of Mets' history. He did it 3 years straight, with gold glove level defense.

    It doesn't have to be Franco, but I want every single offense AB in 2021, other than perhaps Nido or other back up catcher, to be high quality. No rest for the opposing pitchers. If there is a player out there with a better offense/defense mix for the price do it.

    I too love Luis' game, but I want every single AB other than back up catcher to be tough - wait, I already said that, but crowded conditions tend to work themselves out due to injuries.

    What has killed the Mets over the years has NOT been defense - it has been crappy back up and utility pitchers and hitters. Horrible output almost every single season.

    In 1986, they team not only had fine talent, it had few wasted at bats and wasted innings due to drecky back up ballplayers.

    If Lindor (heaven forbid) gets hurt, Luis can be my SS, or Luis / Villar.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I love Guillorme and I'd be happy for him to take some time at 3B. Let's see how that works.

    But I'll say this: It already sickens me to think that a guy like Villar will leapfrog Guillorme and steal his playing time.

    Villar is not versatile. He has little experience at 3B and OF; he's a middle infielder who isn't very good at fielding.

    And Tom, in terms of "tough ABs," Luis delivers those with amazing consistency. He takes walks at a high rate, works counts, goes with the pitch. He may not hit HRs, but he compete every single AB.

    Absolutely the worst thing the Mets did last season -- a disgrace, really -- was trading for Todd Frazier and, for the next three weeks, playing that guy and sitting Luis to the point where he wasn't playing at all. Guillorme was hitting like .330 at the time and has a better glove than Frazier's. I do suspect that Jeff was behind some of the Frazier Love, but Brodie and Rojas, possibly, were complicit.

    When a player comes along and produces like Guillorme, and brings skills that directly address a team weakness, you have to reward that.

    Oh, and Franco is a joke. He can't field! Why on earth do you replace JD for a guy who can't field? It's ridiculous. The Phillies are laughing. Hopefully the Mets "interest" is nothing more than the usual perfunctory vigilance.

    Jimmy


    ReplyDelete
  10. Have to agree with Vipor.

    I would only sign Franco to a minor league contract for depth. I actualy don't really even want him. He is no better defensively than Davis. He brings nothing to this team. He is slow, unenthusiastic, and a butcher in the field.

    The job should be Davis's to lose. Give the guy 40 games. If he doesn't cut it
    just have him share 3rd base with Guillorme. Late inning defense, at bats against tough righties, good guy in the club house. What more do you need.

    Villar should be strictly a bench piece. Pitch hit, pitch run, spell players once in a while. He's actually a good bench piece....nothing more.

    We should give Davis a real shot. If his bat is equal to 2019 we can live with his defense.

    LGM

    ReplyDelete
  11. Let's not forget that many teams have signed veteran bench guys to MnL deals with ST invites.

    Just the numbers game dictates that some will not make the cut, even if they show they have something left in the tank.

    I say wait until teams make their cuts, and decide them whom to pick up that offer more than Franco.

    ReplyDelete