One of the things that Mets fans hoped to see with the transition from the Wilpons to Steve Cohen was a new way of doing business.
Ask anyone what was wrong with the Wilpon family approach and the list of grievances will come back quickly and be rather extensive. From failing to sign the best of the best free agents, cowardice in making trades, abandonment of most foreign markets for player resources, odd selections of in-dugout and front office personnel and a laundry list of embarrassing media encounters, the Wilpons were fans’ special kind of hellish gatekeepers that prevented the club from becoming true contenders.
With Steve Cohen the fans received an owner who not only had money, but indicated he was not afraid to spend it. Thus far there have been some fundamental changes in the approach, including the big trade that brought Francisco Lindor and Carlos Carrasco to New York (as well as the Mets’ record-setting contract for the new shortstop).
There was a below-the-radar free agent signing of Taijuan Walker that’s proven to be outstanding. Then there were some more conspicuous choices like Trevor May who is at best a work in progress.
What didn’t change with the arrival of Cohen to the big boy’s chair was his chosen GM, Sandy Alderson. Mets fans are highly familiar with Alderson’s way of doing business. How much of it was him, how much of it was the Wilpon directives and how much was a combination of the two is somewhat unclear.
These incidents are just one aspect of Sandy Alderson’s history with the Mets that needs to come under scrutiny. There are the personnel approaches that are at best aggravating, sometimes stunning and often the cause of great anxiety. He has generally stayed out of the big ticket section of the warehouse store, preferring instead to find value picks who might somehow revitalize their careers in New York after being shunned by other clubs nationwide.
Then there is the issue of how the minor leagues have been run, glacially moving people up the ladder, insisting in most cases of full years at rookie level, A ball, AA ball and AAA ball. While that patience can perhaps be understood and lauded for teenagers signing directly out of high school, for college graduates already 21 or 22 years old it would seem excessively cautious in curtailing their availability to play in the major leagues.
Earlier this week in an article criticizing this Mets pattern, it was pointed out that allowing people to reach the majors sooner would mean they would hit free agency at an under-30 age and potentially let the front office and team in general look bad if you had a 27 or 28 year old walking away for big dollars somewhere else.
Really? Is it a matter of vanity or Scrooge McDuck level of financial planning that bringing up a ballplayer when he is available to help the club win is therefore a much lesser priority?
While it may be clear that certain players need time to establish themselves in the minors in order to be ready for The Show, other players are ready to compete at a much earlier age.
The frustration is that the Mets never seem to realize it unless multiple injuries force their hand, but even then they’re much more enthusiastic about picking up DFA scrap heap picks from other teams than allowing their younger players the chance to prove themselves. Sometimes you get Khalil Lee results. Other times you get Tylor Megill results.
It would appear that if the Mets are indeed going to be seeking a new direction for the architecture of the club (including, perhaps, a new General Manager or a conversion from Interim to GM for Zack Scott), maybe it’s time for Sandy Alderson to step down. No one here really thought that a team with balsa wood bats would be in first place at the All Star break. No one expected the huge number of injuries.
What people did perhaps expect (and grimace) was the same old same old in terms of how the club is dealing with their roster issues. Changing batting coaches didn’t accomplish anything. Finding real quality ballplayers is apparently not part of their personnel strategy under Alderson.
They keep hoping to keep the plates spinning while awaiting the return of many from the IL who were not exactly setting the world on fire before they got hurt. That doesn’t sound like a formula for either short term or long term success.
Thank you, Sandy, for helping guide new ownership through the start of a full baseball season. That effort is appreciated. How you’ve background checked people, hired people, found players, addressed free agency and mostly avoided trades has not suggested that anything much has changed. It’s high time it does.
I agree wholeheartedly about 2020 and prior. The scrap heap produced crap results over and over and over again. Playoffs missed as a result? My guess is at least a few over the past 20 years, perhaps several.
ReplyDeletePillar and Villar - both have been pillars. Peraza? A better quality signing than past years' scraps, when most of those were true retreads or Maybin-old. All three have helped them survive a long term pandemic of injuries.
In 2015 they pulled the trigger in July to tremendous effect. A rarity. I think Cohen (once he missed out on the Handyman, Trevor Bauer) wanted to stay below cap at least until mid-year to not look like a fool early on if he went under the cap only to have the season sink rapidly under the water.
I think if it makes sense NOW to bust the cap, he will. Given the NL West's likely having both wild cards, the NL East will be "win the division or go home." He wants badly to win the division.
I've read this through twice and I'm still confused.
ReplyDeleteWhile I note the whine, the shrill tone of complaint, I can't identify what exactly has caused your ire. There are no specifics, none. What are you whining about?
The glacial pace of the minor leagues? Are there helpful guys that we don't know about? Who is being held back?
From what I can see, Sandy has been effectively kicked upstairs and Scott is running the day-to-day. Cohen has owned the team through one half of one season. That's it.
To argue that this year is the same old, same old -- well, you really have to be chronic complainer to make that weak argument.
Jimmy
Reese
ReplyDeleteYou know what a big fan I am of signing top 16 yr. old talent out of Latin America
The Wilson owned Mets have done a poor job of this over the years though recent big buck signings of guys like Rosario, Alvarez, and Ramirez gave me hope that this will continue
Then Cohen comes along and the Mets don't sign one player at a bonus level over 1mil
I don't know.
*WILPON
ReplyDelete@Jimmy -- Hmmn...starting with the paragraph outlining his poor hiring practices, staying out of the best talent options when forming his roster, the slow pace of advancing players, the conjecture that keeping them until later saves face and money, the doing nothing to improve the offense approach, and the hope that returning ballplayers are the answer to everything...but sorry I didn't make enough points.
ReplyDeleteMack, I want Cohen to sign the next Vlad Guerrero - and stop the Mets from signing the next Greg Guerrero
ReplyDeleteTom:
ReplyDeleteThis may be just me, but I understand the signing of Francisco Lindor in the sense that we had a new owner and he wanted to let the fans know that his arrival would usher in a new culture and way of thinking here. But I didn't really like this one move and here's why.
Francisco was a long term signing for here, and he is like two years older than Amed Rosario, whom I felt was good enough to start, had shown (like Lindor) definitive spark plug versatility, and was young enough to expect him to in shirt term develop into an All Star shortstop. The only vague argument any Mets fan could have against Amed was his defense, I suppose. But look at the stats on Francisco and Amed, compare them at this point in 2021. Amed is hitting like .263 BA and Lindor .220 BA. and has the same exact number of fielding errors as Francisco, higher slugging percentage and more overall base hits than Lindor, while Lindor leads in homeruns (3 more), and RBI's (6).
My point is this, the Mets spent something like $33.0 million more a season (a ten year one running through 2031) by trading a younger soon to be All Star shortstop for and already All Star shortstop slightly older one. And look at the mid-season stats difference. My point is simply how is that a good move for any team, when monies could be spent more wisely on areas of greater importance that could make a more significant team difference?
That's what kind of is irritating to me here over the seasons past as well. But then again if you want irritating, try being a NY Knicks fan and watch management basically make the same one off season move (season after season) for some new fancy pants guard that never changes a single thing here with the team's won/loss record. It's the frontcourt actually too.
What would I be looking at second half?
ReplyDelete1. Being almost anal about making certain NO starter in the rotation pitches too many innings or is left in a game when he is visibly tiring. And you can see this with most pitchers.
2. Looking at stretching out a little more pitchers like Drew Smith and Corey Oswalt once Corey can get back. Just to have them ready as insurance.
3. Systematic rests (games off) for each and every starting player and pitcher. One of this team's best strengths is the team's depth. Utilize this to your advantage.
5. Second base. The Mets have like three players that can play this position and that MiLB Cortez kid as well. Jeff McNeil could be moved to right. This is why I say that I might use Michael Conforto in a trade for a top-end more starter on a short term final season contract.
6. Solidifying the bull pen roles. Like granite. This is another team strength. They have very good arms out there now. Maybe could use a lefty set-up more.
7. Leave the nice platoon between McCann and Nido alone. Don't enter into this equation anyone else unless one gets hurt and you need a call up. This platoon works.
8. Employ some analytics. But do not make it your only thought process. As Luis adds experience, certain game situations will dominate any possible analytics. It's experience and a visceral read on the part of the manager. Manager Luis will be fine handling this. Trust him.
I’ll bet Lindor clearly outplays Amed in the 2nd half. If Amed turns out to be very good, it might partly be being out of the NY glare.
ReplyDeleteAnd if he gets really good, he will likewise be expensive soon. Arb in 2022 and 2023, then free agent.
I just don’t like the lengthof Lindor’s contract. But, despite his surprisingly weak offense, he is part of the reason the Mets are in first place. You cannot put a price on first place.
The tear of the excelling former Met. Brad Wieck? 15 outings, 17 innings, 28 Ks, no runs.
ReplyDeleteI agree Sandy was a transitional hire and will probably move on after this season. It's been a wierd season highlighted by underperfornces from key players. In paper they are a strong team. Time to start showing up.
ReplyDelete