Pages

12/2/24

Paul Articulates – Excellence at what price?


This off-season has Mets fans filled with anxious anticipation as they await news on new free agent signings that will improve a team that reached the NLCS last year.  With so much money coming off the books from previously traded stars, The Mets have some awesome flexibility to acquire some players that can bring them to the next level.

We are well aware of the Juan Soto sweepstakes, which most accounts would give the Mets a good chance of winning.  We are also aware of the strong need to bolster the starting rotation, and with several excellent arms in the market, time will tell who chooses to wear the Orange and Blue.

Unfortunately for the Mets’ owner and his accountants, the price of free agent pitching seems to be reaching new heights.  Of course it was the Dodgers, always among the top salary distributers in the league, who set the bar higher this year by signing Blake Snell to a five year, $182M contract.  

Snell has certainly had some outstanding years, winning the Cy Young award once in each league.  However, he also has had some less than outstanding years and a history of injury which makes the value of this year’s contract a large financial risk for the Dodgers.  But by taking that risk, the Dodgers also boxed in most other teams that have less financial strength to afford some of the remaining free agent pitchers.

We figured that something like this would happen to set a high bar.  What we did not figure were some of the deals lower down in the performance spectrum that have also escalated the price of pitching.  What do I mean?  

On November 27th, the Angels signed 33 year old left-hander Yusei Kikuchi to a three year, $63M contract.  Don’t change the batteries in your calculators, that really is a $21M AAV for a pitcher that has a lifetime 4.57 ERA and has only registered one season under 3.0 – last year with the Blue Jays and Astros.  

If a starter with six years in MLB with a sub-.500 record and a sub-100 ERA+ is worth $21M/year, what does it cost to sign someone like Corbin Burnes with a 60-36 record and career ERA of 3.19? Burnes has averaged 189+ innings pitched over the last four years which makes him a workhorse with a Cy Young pedigree.  

It seems like the “outrageous” $40M+ salaries paid to Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander by the Mets a few years ago could be challenged with these salary escalations.

The Snell offer was interesting because the Dodgers structured their deal with large bonuses and significant deferrals, so the book value is only $26M AAV.  This is potentially a creative way to get away from the “outrageous” salary numbers, but it still hits the owner’s pocketbook just as hard.

I know that David Stearns is capable of making some pretty creative deals, and there is probably no one as savvy about finances as owner Steve Cohen.  But it is still mind-boggling to see where the market is headed this year.  

One would expect that the Mets are trying to score more than one starting pitcher, and with the escalation this is going to be very difficult to maneuver under the luxury tax thresholds.

We will all wait impatiently for word on the current bidding wars and hope for a favorable conclusion.


11 comments:

  1. Hey, we got Frankie. Things are looking up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The girls swoon when they hear Frankie, Ray. It seems the dam of deals is about to burst.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Paul, I would prefer Kukuchi. Reason is that as a lefty, he was excellent when leaving a Toronto. Maybe Montas has more upside that I think, ut at $17MM per year, I just don’t know if the market will continue to support the salaries that are requested.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Somehow it doesn't matter who is running the Mets as they seem to all make the same stupid mistakes time and time again. Why Montas?. Why take a project when there are proven starters on the market and you have the money to sign them?. The Mets want to be the Dodgers of the east. The ones in the west signed Snell, the ones on the east signed Montas.

    If the Mets don't get the quality pitching and the lock down bullpen, it WONT matter if they sign Soto because they will lose anyway.

    I guess that simply bringing back Manaea, Severino and if you had to take a chance, why not Bieber or Buehler instead of Montas?. Why not go for the best like the Dodgers and sign Burnes?, no, Montas and Genesis for the BP.

    These signings could turn out good and work, but for a team that wants to win now and be the best on the east, why not sign the proven players instead of trying to fix players that are not performing when you have the funds available to sign the best?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Matt Boyd was a much better signing at $29 Mil over two years than Montas. The Cubs obtained the better pitcher at a better price! Remember, the last SP Stearns acquired from the Brewers was Adrian Hauser........... ugh!!!! Montas = Hauser? I certainly hope not. Yes, Montas has better stuff than Hauser but he walks too many, gives up numerous gopher balls and can't stay healthy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Grant Hartwig has been re-signed by the Mets. I think Mack mentioned his non-renewal a few days ago.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hartwig probably has some value going forward, and the Mets need tons of arms.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Matt Boyd seems to have spotty career results, not sure how many injuries, and will be 34 in February. I would have preferred Oil Can Boyd. That dude could pitch.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As much as I would like to see Burnes in the rotation, he is going to be pretty pricey. My preference of pricey free agents is Juan Soto. If they can get Soto, bring back Manaea, grab another reclamation project like Spencer Turnbull and finally sign Shane Bieber to a flexible 2 year deal to see if they can strike some lightning in 2H25 and keep for 2026 if he works out.

    Another bullpen piece or three is necessary. I'd like to bring Stanek back.

    Overall, my priority is to get the best line-up as possible and score some runs. They need to get on the board earlier in games than they did in 2024.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I trust Stearns and the scouting/development team he’s brought in, and clearly Montas was at or near the top of their list - particularly at that price. He’s got good stuff, a history of success, and after losing all of ‘23, looked very good finishing up this past season. Sevi and Manea both ended up being bargains.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am sure that Montas was an "and" not an "or". There will be other signings of higher performance pitching before this is done. Montas becomes either a SP4 or SP5 or is an option when someone goes down with injury.

    ReplyDelete