After Dahl, I will profile Courtney Hawkins to finish this
draft series before Monday’s festivities. I will do blurbs on some other
players that the Mets might look at in later rounds but if you would like me to
write anything about a specific player, let me know.
Today’s player profile looks at Keith Law’s projection for
the Mets in his mock draft 2.0, OF David Dahl.
Previous player profiles:
Mets 2012 Draft- David Dahl- OF- Oak Mountain High School , AL
Jonathan Mayo projection: Pick 17- Blue Jays
Baseball America/Jim Callis projection: Pick 12- Mets
Keith Law: Pick
12- Mets
Matt Grabusky: Pick
16- Nationals
Mets select: 12.
As you can see above, the Mets have been tied to Dahl by a
number of reputable sources. This could be for a number of reasons (I have not
heard any of these confirmed, for the record): A private workout held for Dahl,
insider information, educated guesses based on last year’s pick, Brandon Nimmo,
and the thought that the Mets will take an outfielder (Dahl becomes the choice
because Buxton, Almora, and Hawkins all project to be off the board by 12).
Here is what you need to know about David Dahl:
Five-tool player.
Scouts have concern over his ability to stick in center
despite good speed and a plus arm.
Line-drive swing, good bat speed, contact hitter.
Scouts project that Dahl, at best, becomes a 20-20 center fielder with an above
average glove.
Baseball America compared Dahl to Jeremy
Hermida (as an amateur) who went pick 1-11 in 2002.
Got over a bout with mono that led to a diminished
draft stock that has continued to climb all the way up to draft day.
Concerns over results against weak competition.
I keep saying there are going to be options at #12. While my
top 11 guys from months ago seem to be filing right in to positions 1 through
11, I still believe one will fall to us for pick 12 and we get an A+ prospect.
Dahl, in my eyes, is not one of them. This quotation from Baseball America echoes
my concerns with Dahl as a pro:
“They (scouts) also
aren't all sold on his instincts to be a center fielder, though most believe
he'll stick in the position. Dahl's biggest weakness is his low-energy
demeanor. Some scouts consider him simply unmotivated by middling high school
competition, while others see a low motor and question his desire to be great.
The tools are all there for a first-round power/speed center fielder”.
Mets fans seem opposed to Gavin Cecchini and I have no idea
why. I would much prefer Cecchini or Hawkins to Dahl and we know one (if not
all three) will be available by the time the Mets pick.
I still have my heart set on Fried, Almora, Hawkins, Zimmer,
Heaney, and, yes, Stroman. One of those players will be on the board and, if
not, I am full-speed ahead on the Cecchini train. Also, if anyone has any other
mixed metaphors related to draft prospects, please do let me know.
Dahl just is not the guy I want in this draft. Or let’s put
it this way: I would much prefer toolsy speedster and future gold-glove
candidate Lewis Brinson to David Dahl. Brinson projects to still be around by
the Mets supplemental #35 pick (where I am crossing my fingers they take him).
I do not mean to sound too harsh regarding Dahl. He is an
outstanding baseball player and will certainly make a formidable professional
athlete. However, I think there are better options for the Mets at #12.
Edit: Keith Law released his third mock draft on June 1st
and has the Rockies taking Dahl two picks
before the Mets select.
LGM
Stephen, I totally agree- I'll be very disappointed if we draft Dahl with our first pick. I'd rather we stretch and draft Stryker then grab the wrong outfielder. At least a catcher with upside is something we don't have in the org right now...
ReplyDeleteI'm not convinced Stryker is even going to be a catcher long term. I'll pass there. There are a TON of players the Mets could reach for who would still be worthy or the stretch and might even be able to sign for well under slot: Jankowski, Brinson, Naquin, Smoral, Victor Roache, and one guy I'm warming up to more and more...D.J. Davis.
ReplyDeleteId rather them take the gamble and possibly receive a huge payoff with Roache
ReplyDeleteI agree that Roache is worth the gamble. Now that Bill Maher owns a piece, maybe we CAN spend some $$ in the future.
ReplyDeleteI would approve of the Roache selection. There's even some thought he'll be around by our second pick (#35).
ReplyDeleteRoache has not healed well.
ReplyDeleteWas not cleared for playoffs.
My sources (this is a local school I know well) tell me his injruy could limit bat speed in future
I would stay away from him and I wanted him badly before the injury
What of corey seager? dont see much on him. Sounds like he has a better bat than cecchini and dahl.
ReplyDeletemaybe not wright's pick, but looks good to me if the big arms are gone..
Seager is up there... probable first day draft pick, as a pitcher
ReplyDeleteSeager's one of those guys who has gotten some late-hour attention for the top 10. I have him slipping to the late/supplemental as a 3B.
ReplyDelete