9/10/26

RVH – The Bottom Between Four & Six: One Week Later

 

Last week, we introduced the Mets’ unusual race for the best possible odds of receiving a protected top-six selection in the 2027 Draft.


One week later, the Mets are playing well.


Very well.


With another win Wednesday night in Miami, New York has now won four straight, improved to 68–78, and continued one of the strongest stretches of baseball in the league.


The tradeoff is the same one we discussed last week: every win makes the Mets’ potential Draft position a little more precarious.


New York currently sits seventh among lottery-eligible clubs. Tankathon’s estimated probability of the Mets landing one of the six lottery selections remains 39.4%, down from 63.6% when we checked the board one week ago.


Remember the distinction: finishing among the bottom six does not automatically protect the Mets’ first pick. It only improves their lottery odds. Under the current CBT rule, only an actual selection from No. 1 through No. 6 protects the first pick and shifts the Mets’ projected 10-place penalty to their second-highest selection.


Reverse Standings and Top-Six Lottery Odds



Raw rank

Team

Record

Lottery status

Top-six odds

1

Colorado

55–90

Eligible

87.7%

2

Angels

56–90

Eligible

87.7%

3

Athletics

58–89

Eligible

87.7%

4

San Fran.

62–85

Ineligible

5

Kansas City

64–82*

Eligible

73.3%

6

Washington

67–81

Eligible

62.9%

7

Detroit

67–79

Eligible

51.3%

8

Mets

68–78

Eligible

39.4%

9

Seattle

68–78

Eligible

28.8%

10

Minnesota

69–77

Eligible

20.0%

11

Cincinnati

69–76*

Eligible

15.8%

12

Baltimore

71–76

Eligible

12.6%

13

St. Louis

72–75

Eligible

10.4%

14

Miami

72–75

Eligible

9.3%

15

Pittsburgh

72–73*

Ineligible


*September 9 game not yet final at this writing.


Colorado moves ahead of the Angels in the raw standings after the Rockies’ loss tonight, while San Francisco improved to 62–85 with its third straight win. Washington lost again, falling to 67–81, while Detroit won and moved to 67–79. Those two clubs have now flipped lottery positions ahead of the Mets.


San Francisco and Pittsburgh remain ineligible for the lottery under current rules. The White Sox are also ineligible but remain outside this bottom group.


Teams tied in winning percentage are ultimately ordered using MLB’s prior-season-record tiebreaker. The probabilities shown here are Tankathon estimates based on the current standings and current CBA rules.


The Bottom Dwellers Since the Deadline


Here is where the story gets more interesting.


The 2026 trade deadline was August 3. Using August 4, the first full day afterward, gives us a cleaner way to compare how these clubs have performed with essentially the rosters they chose to carry through the remainder of the season.


The Mets have not merely outperformed the teams around them.


They are 21–12 since August 4, a .636 winning percentage.



Rank

Team

Since Aug. 4

Win%

GB Mets

1

Mets

21–12

.636

2

Kansas City*

18–15

.545

3.0

3

Baltimore

17–18

.486

5.0

4

Cincinnati*

16–18

.471

5.5

5

Minnesota

13–20

.394

8.0

6

Seattle

13–20

.394

8.0

7

Detroit

13–21

.382

8.5

8

Washington

12–23

.343

10.0


*September 9 game still pending.


That is the most important context for understanding how quickly the Draft board has moved.


Detroit and Washington did not move below the Mets because New York collapsed.


Quite the opposite.


The Mets have played some of the best baseball in the sport while the teams competing with them for lottery position have largely struggled.


Since August 4, New York has now outplayed every club in this comparison by at least three games.


Washington presents the clearest immediate threat to the Mets’ lottery position. The Nationals lost again Wednesday, have now dropped seven straight and are just one loss behind New York despite having played two more games. They also finish the season with three games against Detroit followed by three against the Mets.


Detroit is more difficult to handicap. The Tigers finally won Wednesday, but their 13–21 record since August 4 has pushed them into the sixth eligible lottery position. Their season-long run differential still suggests a better club than their recent record.


Seattle matters just as much. Wednesday’s win moved the Mariners to 68–78 — exactly even with the Mets — although the prior-season tiebreaker currently places New York ahead of Seattle in the Draft order.


Kansas City remains three games below the Mets in our post-deadline comparison and several games ahead of them in the reverse standings. The Royals therefore remain increasingly difficult for New York to catch.

Sixteen Games Left

The Mets now have 16 games remaining.


And Wednesday’s result clarifies the central tension of this exercise even further.


At the current seventh lottery seed, their estimated probability of landing a top-six selection remains roughly four in ten.


But there is another force working increasingly hard against their Draft position:


The Mets themselves.


They are 21–12 since the deadline. Young players are contributing. The team is playing competitive baseball. And they just swept a road series in Miami.


That is exactly what September should provide in a lost season.


There is no reason to root against that progress.


It simply creates an unusual tradeoff. Every sign that the Mets may be emerging from the wreckage of 2026 also makes it somewhat harder to preserve the premium Draft position that the wreckage created.


One week ago, the Mets appeared to be sitting relatively comfortably inside this race.


Now they are seventh.


Seattle is tied with them.


Detroit and Washington are immediately below them.


And there are still 16 games left.


The Bottom Between Four & Six is officially a race.


Sources: MLB standings and schedules; MLB current CBA/CBT rules; Tankathon for estimated lottery probabilities. Post-deadline records calculated from games beginning August 4.


Final qualification: this analysis applies the rules currently in effect. The current CBA expires December 1, 2026, and the rules governing the 2027 Draft lottery and CBT-pick treatment could change under the next agreement.


9 comments:

Mack Ade said...

(friggin' Mets...)

AJ said...

They are taking a page out of the Jets playbook, as the Jets always screw up their draft position.

Tom Brennan said...

You want the Mets to win, they lose. You want the Mets to lose, they win,

Even pitching the ultimate journeyman, Robert Stockton, hasn’t generated losses. The Mets are 5-3 in games he’s pitched in, despite a 5.93 ERA.

This team…

Tom Brennan said...

Mets fans have had the Willies ever since Joe Willie Namath won that Super Bowl several centuries ago.

Tom Brennan said...

And Jets fans!

RVH said...

Such a conundrum: want to draft position but also want the fight - especially the kids & the “leaders” demonstrating to the kids not to give up.

If I’m the owner, I want the pick but I also want them fighting for pride & professionalism - especially given how much money in paying them.

Also (very) partially vindicates the FO to some degree…

Maybe Senga can become a high-leverage arm next season???!!!

Tom Brennan said...

Senga replaces Weaver in pen, IMO.

Jules C-- The Cautious Optimist said...

I understand the stress, but I have difficulty believing that the difference between a number 6 draft pick and a number 17 in terms of the likely impact on a team's overall success is statistically meaningful. There are just too many other factors that go into a team's success. Of course, there will be cases one can point to, but I am talking about overall. Is there available data on that? Is there data that would be meaningful, which would require eliminating other important variables.?
I offer the following as a reasonable view of the matter which doesn't prevent reasonable debate on the underlying issue: Before the trade deadline trades and the re-energized performance of teams throughout the organization (not to mention the absence of talent), it would have been reasonable to say that securing a #6 draft pick would have been extremely important to the Mets, but that since then the Mets have shown that they have a number of talented players in the minors and in the majors that are young, hungry and very good, and that the difference one player, other than say a top 3 pick, in this year (or any year?) would make a substantial difference to the team's long term success as compared to what a player chosen ten spots later would.
I think the way to look at it might be this: When you get to number 15 in the draft the quality of what you are looking at depends on you ability to judge a lot of factors and there will be reasonable disagreement about who deserves to be picked 'that high' or at that spot. In contrast, there will often be disagreement about who the number 1 pick should be, but often a great deal of consensus about who falls within the top 3-5.

RVH said...

100% Jules. Britton (I think) did a piece in this & the draft position difference is negligible- the key difference was higher very rare upside variance, which was a crap shoot.

Win as much as you can. Learn to knock back playoff aspirants & play with meaning. That is the core lesson.

The mlb team must set the standard for all of the organizations teams. That the real point.

Personal & team pride & dignity.