6/11/26

Alex Rubinson - Forever Young: Mets Hope First Baseman's Hot Stretch Lives Forever

The New York Mets made the unpopular decision in the offseason to let homegrown star Pete Alonso head towards the beltway to join the Baltimore Orioles. David Stearns was hoping to spread out the money saved on Alonso throughout the rest of the roster. The team inked Jorge Polanco to a multi-year contract with the plan to play him at first. The team also had Mark Vientos on the roster, who was not that far removed from a breakout 2024 campaign. As the Mets season has spiraled, the team has gotten solid production at first base lately. It’s not just from the player that anyone expected. 

Coming into the week, Jared Young had only played in 22 games. The sample size is incredibly small, but his .291/.375/.509 slash line has been a pleasant surprise to both the fan base and the front office. If Young qualified, his .884 OPS would be second on the team to Juan Soto. Young has been red hot and has provided an offensive spark since he was activated off of the injured list on May 26th. He has a 150 wRC+ on the year. Essentially, Young has been 50% better than the average hitter in his limited playing time. 


Although Young’s performance might be more of a flash in the pan, his process has greatly improved at the dish. He still strikes out a quarter of the time, which is not ideal, but that number is still down almost 10% compared to 2024 and would be the lowest of his MLB career. In addition to him striking out less often, he is also drawing more free passes. His 11 percent walk rate is above average to begin with, but it looks even better when taking into account he only walked four percent a season ago. 


Young has been very lucky with .351 batting average on balls in play, but that also stems from him squaring everything up. He currently has a hard hit rate of over 52% with a barrel rate of nearly 18%. The hard hit rate has jumped about 13 percentage points compared to 2025. His expected average of .284 is not that far off from his actual average. Plus, his expected slug (.514) is slightly higher than what Young was slugging coming into the week (.509). His walk rate has also been a main contributor as to why Young xWOBA is just a couple of clicks under the .400 mark. 


Even if Young’s BABIP is destined to regress, the quality of contact has been so good that Young’s numbers shouldn’t suffer astronomically. The most stark contrast is the fact that Young has gained seven miles per hour on his average exit velocity. It currently stands at 92 MPH, which is not that far off from a hard hit ball by MLB’s definition. 


Young has shown tremendous improvement regardless of fastball or offspeed, but it’s still fascinating to look at the breakdowns of where he has taken the biggest strides. Specifically against the four-seamer, Young has cut his whiff rate by 20%. Last year, he was under the Mendoza line when it came to hitting any type of fastball. This year, his average is up over 200 points. It’s ironic that his slugging has gone down from last year, but his more consistent approach has allowed me to produce better overall results against hard stuff. The exact opposite is true when facing offspeed pitches. Young’s average has taken a hit, but is doing more damage. 


His slugging is way up, and there is reason to believe he has also been unlucky. Although he only has a .222 average versus offspeed pitches, his expected average sits nearly at .295. Although he posted a very respectable .286 average last on offspeed stuff, his expected average was under .150. Yes, Dusty Baker was famous for saying he only cared about exit hits, Young’s performance on offspeed pitches this season should improve while his performance last year was not sustainable. 


This season, Young has pulled the ball in the air 20% of the time. That’s actually not the highest in his career (2023 takes it), but the biggest difference is Young being more on time. Typically when you are pulling the ball, you are more out in front, which allows you to unlock more of that power. If you are going to the opposite field, you are typically late. 


Hitters have success both ways, but when lifting the ball, most players want to pull it (unless you’re Aaron Judge or James Wood). This season, Young’s opposite field air rate is under three percent. That is way down from about 29% a season ago. 


Fangraphs and Baseball Savant have also graded Young as a slightly above average defender. It can’t be easy given Young has played a few games in the outfield along with spending most of his time at first base. Both websites have him as a plus-one in fielding run value with Fangraphs also having him at plus-one in outs above average, explaining that Young has better than average range. 


Jared Young’s current OPS is over 100 points higher than what he has posted in his career. His average is 60 points higher than his career number. It’s too far to say that Young is quickly becoming a .300/.400/.500 player, who has unlocked a few extra gears in his age 30 season. Remember, he had only tallied 64 plate appearances coming into the series against the St. Louis Cardinals. 


With that being said, Young is checking off every underlying statistical box that one wants to see in 2026. He is striking out less and walking more. He is pulling his flyballs. Despite a high BABIP, his expected numbers point towards him not being lucky. Although he might not play a premium position, his defense is getting better with age. Jorge Polanco appeared on the precipice of making his return to Queens but has been shut down due to ankle soreness that popped up during his rehab stint. Whether Polanco is forced to miss just an extra week or a whole other month, Carlos Mendoza needs to find ways to get Young consistent opportunities. Carson Benge’s breakout is probably more sustainable and beneficial for the Mets’ long-term plans, but Young is proving that he can be more of a player than his constant shipped to and from the minor leagues.


Tom Brennan: Mets Player Grades, Mets DSL Blue Explosion, And Other Scores


Low grades abound….

An Overall D+?


The season is far enough along now for me to give out player “in progress” grades. 

Grades are based on my perception of players’ actual performance vs. my own preseason expectations for them. I use 5 grading categories.

A few of the 36 guys below have played very little so far, and so were hard to grade, but, what the heck, I graded them anyway:


A) Well Above Average, Compared to expectations (9):

Weaver, Benge, Ewing, Young, Holmes, Scott, Warren, Brazoban, Pintaro

- where would this team be without them?


B) Above Average Expectations (2): 

Edwards, Gerber

- VERY slim pickings


C. As expected (5): 

Soto (I am overlooking his injury), McLean, Meyer, Torrens, Slater

- Soto and McLean should jump up soon.


D. Below Expectations (12): 

Alvarez, Baty, Melendez, Morabito, Tong, Peralta, Manaea, Williams, Kimbrel, Thornton, Semien, Mauricio

- the Dirty Dozen


E. Well below expectations (8): 

Lindor, Robert, Polanco, Vientos, Taylor, Peterson, Senga, Bichette

- Not good at all.


In the worst category just above are 8 guys who were heavily counted on going into the season to contribute a lot. They’ve contributed a lot of grief, instead.

Fourteen “key” guys in the two lowest categories. That’ TOO MANY.


No wonder, going into Wednesday’s game, that the Mets are 8 games under .500 and 15 games behind the Braves.

IT COULDA BEEN WOISE.


DSL METS BLUE OFFENSIVE EXPLOSION

I love offense.

The Mets Blue squad had 8 innings of offense on Wednesday. 

They were, to say the least, quite productive.

As in 22 runs, 19 hits, 15 walks.

Their slacker opponents only managed to score 14 runs on 10 hits, 9 walks and several hit batsmen. 

Home plate was worn out and replaced after the game.


Mets lose 9-2. Peterson stunk again. Just 3 hits? Oy vey.

Elsewhere:

A night after St Lucie threw a no hitter, they lost 17-0, and had one hit.

Binghamton shut out also, on 4 hits.

The FCL Mets were shut out also, 10-0.

Syracuse and Brooklyn won, however. Can’t lose them all.


The rest of the night for me? Wembanyama vs. Knicks. What a game.

6/10/26

RVH - Rethinking the Mets, Part 5: The Dodgers Don't Just Spend. They Control the Board

 

In Part 1, we argued that the Mets do not have an ambition problem. They have an execution problem.

In Part 2, we examined how slow starts create a pressure-amplification cycle that makes every season feel harder than it needs to be.

In Part 3, we explored how the Yankees learned to carry pressure through decades of stability and accumulated trust.

In Part 4, we examined how the Braves built resilience through development, continuity, and replacement power.

That brings us to the third modern baseball powerhouse.

The Dodgers.

And perhaps the most misunderstood organization in sports.

Because contrary to popular belief, the Dodgers do not win because they spend money.

They win because they create options.

The Wrong Conversation

Whenever the Dodgers are discussed, the conversation usually begins and ends with payroll.

Too much money.

Too many stars.

Too many advantages.

It's an easy explanation.

It's also incomplete.

Plenty of organizations spend money.

The Mets spend money.

The Yankees spend money.

The Phillies spend money.

The Padres spend money.

Yet none have produced the sustained success of the Dodgers over the past decade and a half.

The difference is not the amount of money.

The difference is how the money is used.

The Dodgers Rebuilt Themselves

It's easy to forget that the Dodgers weren't always what they are today.

Before the current ownership group took control in 2012, the organization had spent years dealing with instability, ownership dysfunction, and uncertainty.

The Dodgers had history.

They had brand power.

They had market size.

But they weren't operating like the modern standard they would eventually become.

What followed over the next fifteen years was one of the most impressive organizational transformations in professional sports.

They didn't simply buy players.

They rebuilt the organization.

They invested in:

  • player development

  • scouting

  • analytics

  • infrastructure

  • sports science

  • international operations

  • baseball operations

They paired financial strength with organizational strength.

And that's where the real advantage emerged.

The Dodgers Rarely Have One Plan

Most organizations operate with Plan A.

The Dodgers often operate with Plans A, B, C, and D.

A prospect breaks out.

Great.

A prospect fails.

There's another one.

A star leaves.

They replace him.

A pitcher gets hurt.

They have depth.

A trade opportunity emerges.

They have resources.

A free agent becomes available.

They have flexibility.

That's not payroll.

That's optionality.

And optionality may be the most powerful advantage in modern baseball.

The Difference Between Spending And Flexibility

This distinction matters for the Mets.

Steve Cohen's ownership immediately changed the organization's financial profile.

For the first time, the Mets could realistically compete with any organization in baseball for talent.

Many people assumed that meant the path forward was simple:

Spend more.

But spending is not the destination.

Flexibility is.

The Dodgers use resources to create choices.

Choices improve decision-making.

Choices reduce desperation.

Choices allow organizations to adapt when circumstances change.

Over time, choices become competitive advantages.

The Dodgers Rarely Panic

This is one of the most remarkable aspects of the organization.

The Dodgers experience setbacks just like everyone else.

They lose players.

They suffer injuries.

They endure disappointing playoff exits.

They make mistakes.

What they rarely do is overreact.

Because organizations with options don't need to panic.

The Dodgers have built enough organizational depth that one problem rarely forces a desperate response.

The organization absorbs setbacks and moves forward.

That should sound familiar.

The Yankees do this through stability.

The Braves do this through replacement power.

The Dodgers do this through flexibility.

Different paths.

Similar outcomes.

The Mets' Greatest Untapped Advantage

This is where the Dodgers become especially relevant.

The Mets already possess the raw material.

Steve Cohen's resources are real.

The ability to invest aggressively is real.

The ability to pursue talent is real.

The ability to improve infrastructure is real.

The ability to accelerate organizational change is real.

The challenge is turning those resources into something more durable.

Because money itself is not a competitive advantage.

Lots of organizations have money.

The real advantage is creating a system where resources continuously generate more options than your competitors possess.

The Dodgers have spent fifteen years doing exactly that.

The Bigger Lesson

The Dodgers are not simply a rich organization.

They are a highly adaptive organization.

They've combined:

  • Yankees-like credibility

  • Braves-like development

  • modern infrastructure

  • financial flexibility

  • organizational discipline

The result is an organization capable of surviving almost any challenge.

And that may be the most important lesson for the Mets.

Because the goal of the Cohen era should not be to build the highest payroll.

It should not be to win the offseason.

It should not even be to assemble the most talented roster.

The goal should be to create an organization that consistently has more good options available than its competitors.

That's what the Dodgers built.

And that's why they remain one of baseball's most formidable organizations year after year.

What The Mets Should Learn

The Dodgers demonstrate that resources become truly powerful only when paired with discipline.

Money creates opportunities.

Infrastructure develops opportunities.

Player development sustains opportunities.

Organizational consistency protects opportunities.

Put them together and you create something much more valuable than payroll.

You create flexibility.

And flexibility is what allows great organizations to remain great when everything doesn't go according to plan.


Part 5 Thesis

The Dodgers do not use money to buy certainty.

They use money to create flexibility.

Their greatest advantage is not payroll. It is the ability to generate more options, absorb more setbacks, and adapt more quickly than their competitors.


What We've Learned So Far

Part 1: The Mets do not have an ambition problem. They have an execution problem.

Part 2: The Mets' slow-start problem is not a standings problem. It is a pressure-amplification problem.

Part 3: The Yankees did not eliminate pressure. They learned how to carry it.

Part 4: The Braves win because they reduce randomness better than almost anyone else.

Part 5: The Dodgers do not use money to buy certainty. They use money to create flexibility.


Next: Part 6 – Citi Field Is Still Part of the Problem

The Yankees teach stability. The Braves teach resilience. The Dodgers teach flexibility. But the Mets face challenges unique to their environment. Before deciding what the Mets should become, we need to understand the obstacles they must overcome.


Tom Brennan - Time to Bail on Mark Vientos? Walking the Walk in the DSL

 


MARK VIENTOS 

Boy, that Mark Vientos had some solid 2024 season, huh?

After a very tough 2023 inaugural partial season.

This year, he was literally given a golden opportunity, what with the exit of Pete Alonso, and current injuries to Lindor, Polanco, and Mauricio. 

Did he grab hold of that opportunity and show that any pre-2026 struggles were due to inconsistent playing time?

No…he…instead, reverted to 2023 performance levels.

In his first real partial season in 2023, he was .211/.253/.367. Lousy.

In 2026 so far, his slash after Tuesday’s game? Just .212/.246/.368. 

Equally, and virtually identically, lousy.

Add to that:

Two steals in 368 career games. No speed.

Sub par fielder…as in…

Marv Throneberry meets Chuck Hiller.

And…

Career .200 with 2 outs and RISP.

Career .180 in late and close situations.

Outward appearance of inner fire? Below average.

Disappointing? Well above average.

Mets Keeper? 

IMO, no.

Syracuse could use him, though. He hits OK there.


What’s your Vientos opinion, readers?  To bail…or not to bail.

My brother said in 2024: “The Mets NEVER SELL HIGH.”

Brother Steve badly wanted Vientos and Baty dealt.

Maybe the Mets need a clear-thinking guy like Steve Brennan on their executive team. He never tells you what you want to hear. He is blunt.


A CAM TILLY & ELWIS MIJARES NO HITTER FOR ST LUCIE!

A 7-0 St Lucie final. NICE!  


Elsewhere…

The NY Mets lost to St Louis, 7-0. Can’t win ‘em all. Can’t win enough.

Binghamton garnered 2 hits while fanning 14 times. Lovely. 10-2 drubbing.

Brooklyn’s hitters managed no runs on 4 hits. Lovely. 

Their pitchers fanned 15 in a 3-0 loss, a bright point. Jose Chirinos fanned 10 of those hombres, but got the loss because…you can’t win when your team scores ZERO TIMES.

Buffalo whipped Tong & Syracuse 7-2, in a rain-shortened 6 inning game.

No happy Tong Recap. 


“WALKING THE WALK” IN THE DSL

OR, IS IT MORE APTLY TITLED “A WALK ON THE WILD SIDE”?

We writers talk the talk. 

Pro players walk the walk. Sometimes to extremes.

There continues to be an incredible abundance of walks in the DSL. 

The league leading DSL Padres through Monday’s game had played five games this season - and walked 57 times.

Think that’s wild?

20 teams already had 40 or more walks in their 5 or 6 games so far.

And some folks call it pro ball.

The Mets’ two DSL teams have “only” averaged 38 walks over 6 games. By comparison, how is THAT for impatient?  One of the two teams then played their 7th game yesterday, allowing 12 walks. Nuts.

The FCL Mets on Tuesday meanwhile proved they love issuing walks, too.

Those FCL Fellas allowed 7 hits, but surrendered 17 runs, due to an insane fourteen (14) walks allowed and 3 hit batsmen.  In a 7 inning game. 

Where the hometown team, because they led, only batted in 6 innings.

Pros.


PARADA RESURGENCE, AND A QUESTION…

Kevin Parada is 13 for 38 (.342) in AAA, with 2 doubles, a triple and a HR.

Very, very nice to see.

Yet, last night, he batted 9th behind Jackson Cluff in the 8 hole. 

Cluff, in 158 ABs, is hitting .152 this season. Not a misprint.

Does Parada hitting 9th behind Cluff make any sense?



Reese Kaplan -- How About the Rest of the 2027 Infield?


The rest of the infield for the Mets in 2027 is somewhat clearer than first base.  For now you could make a prediction for next season based upon what was projected for 2026 but never really evolved as anticipated.

At second base Marcus Semien has proven to be a consummate professional though he started off very slowly with the bat.  He has demonstrated star quality performance defensively and also used his legs effectively.  The power shown previously in his career was not there initially, but after everyone (including me) wrote off the odd Brandon Nimmo trade as a total disaster, at this point Semien is actually exceeding the former Mets outfielder in both home runs and RBIs.  The  difference remains batting average with a gap of just 23 points in Nimmo’s favor during his prolonged slump driving him down from the over .300 plateau he’d enjoyed earlier in the year. 

Right now Nimmo earns $20.5 million per year and will continue to do so through 2030.  That is a financial commitment of over $100 million for what he can do. Right now Semien earns $72 million between now and his contract expiration in 2028.  That $28 million gap is not looking like such a bad differential for now.

At shortstop, obviously a healthy Francisco Lindor will be back as he can win games with his glove, his bat and his legs.  He’s a five time All Star, a four time Silver Slugger and a two time Gold Glove winner.  When on the field he is a leader.  His annual salary of $34.1 million runs now through the 2031 season.  Unless you’re taking on a similarly large contract in exchange he’s not really tradeable nor should you necessarily want to do so.


Third base is the one area where the Mets may have something of unpredictability.  Bo Bichette was hailed as a great arrival and took heat off the front office after they missed out on other stellar offensive free agents.  He’s come to life since June began and it’s possible by year end he will post numbers more in line with what was expected.  Here’s the problem.  As a free agent he’s earning $42 million per year.  For a guy with a career batting average of .289 with power and RBI production that’s not terrible in this day and age.  When this season ends Bichette has an option to return for the same $42 million or the Mets have a $5 million buyout.  Ouch. 

Suppose Bichette finishes with a flourish and approaches that .289 batting average.  He then needs to decide if he wants to test the open market again or not.  Right now his contract with the Mets is only guaranteed for this year.  This same option for 2027 returns for 2028 as well.  He might feel a slightly lower annual rate but spread over a greater number of years is a preferable way to ensure his financial future. 

On the flip side the Mets may decide if he ends 2026 with a batting average sub .250 that he’s simply not worth another $42 million in payroll dollars for the 2027 (and 2028) seasons.  They could exercise the $5 million buyout and use that money to address other needs. 

Here’s the rub.  If he goes, then who plays third base?  Obviously the long term experiments with Mark Vientos and Brett Baty have not resulted in the type of productivity to make anyone feel comfortable with either of them being given the job.  Jorge Polanco could shift across the diamond if another first base option evolves.  None are jumping out as necessarily better than Bichette but all are quite a bit less expensive.

Then there’s the matter of catcher.  Francisco Alvarez has shown offensive ability and defensive skills but neither at All Star levels.  He’s had a number of injuries in his youth and it’s possible that he will continue to progress as he matures.  Luis Torrens is a capable backup but doesn’t have the offensive talent to warrant day to day use.  You could probably write Alvarez’s name in ink for the 2027 season at catcher.  

6/9/26

Cautious Optimist -- All the Young Dudes


 

Everyone says, 'Play the Kids'

The fact is that the Mets have been doing exactly that.  Maybe not just kids, but kids and de facto adolescents.  I have in mind the group composed of Benge, Ewing, McLean, Scott, Meyers, Tong, Baty, Vientos, Alvarez and Mauricio. The youngsters include Benge, Ewing, McLean, Tong and Alvarez.  The comparative adolescents are Scott, Meyers, Baty, Vientos, and Mauricio.  All under 30 -- and all but Meyers home grown.  By any reasonable standard, this group represents an extraordinary infusion of youth into the team, and an organizational success -- too easily overlooked and certainly underappreciated.

Unsurprisingly, not everyone who has been part of the current youth movement has been successful. In fairness, fans are concerned that those who have been around the longest have established themselves as the least likely to succeed: i.e. Baty, Vientos, Alvarez and Mauricio.  The fear is that we are likely to be disappointed by those we are most excited about now as they too will be exposed in the next year or two.  

Adding fuel to the fire is that last year's darling, Nolan McLean, has shown himself to be human, and may fall short of being a true ace capable of anchoring an entire pitching staff. 

Even given the normal Mets fan's hard earned pessimism, this level of anticipatory dismay is unwarranted.   Among the adolescents, Meyers and Scott have earned  their way on to next year's team, and beyond.  I remain hopeful that Mauricio will join them, but his time on the injured list reduces the time he has left to prove his worth.  By next year, he too will be without an option and a decision must be made.  Should he stay or should he go? The answer to that question falls to Stearns, not the Clash.

Of the true kids, Benge, Ewing and McLean have earned their way onto next year's roster and, barring injury, beyond.  I am appealing to special blogger privilege by including Tong along with others who have punched their ticket to next year's opening day bringing the total (setting aside Mauricio) to six youngsters out of ten that can be counted on to make up a quarter of next year's OD roster, and to figure prominently in the Mets plans over the next five years!

But there's more.  While I am explicit in suggesting that we part ways with Alvarez, Baty and Vientos while remaining undecided about Mauricio's fate, I think it's fair to count on others in the youth movement to play significant roles over the course of next season.  I would bet on at least two of Morabito, Santucci, Ross and Wenninger spending many a summer's day in Queens next year.  And while I would cut ties with Baty, Vientos and Alvarez, the FO may have a different view.  And so we may see as few as six and as many as ten of the under 30 crowd spending summer in the city at Citi Field.  

I may be in the minority, but I would argue that by any measure this represents serious organizational success. If you want to see the kids play, come to Queens because you'll see more of them there than at almost any other ballpark in the majors.

On the other hand, many reasonable questions abound 

It's one thing to fill a roster with young players, it's another to determine how good they are or will be and for how long?

What positions do they fill and how important are those positions?

McLean, Scott, Tong and ;Meyers are pitchers, as are Santucci, Wenninger and Ross.  We don't have to worry about their offensive fit.  They perform on the defensive/run prevention side of the ball.  The issue is whether the position players can contribute on both sides of the ball.

Ewing is the CF; Benge the RF.  Individually and jointly, they have given fans and the FO every reason to believe that they will be defensive stalwarts for years to come.  Offensively, Ewing has excellent bat to ball skills and Benge hits with line-drive power to all fields.  Both are plus baserunners and have displayed high levels of BB IQ and appear to be anything but overwhelmed playing under the bright lights of the city.

If Morabito earns a place in next years plans, it will be as the 4th outfielder, unless Soto moves to 1B in which case he may well be the starting LF.  

If Mauricio earns a place on next year's squad, it would be as a back-up infielder, bench piece, and occasional DH.  I would like to see the Mets work him out at 1B when he returns from injury, in the fall league and during Spring Training.  He should also abandon hitting as a right hander.  

I don't see Soto moving to 1B at this point in his career, so finding a genuine all around first baseman able to handle the position for three years or more is an issue for the Mets, and Mauricio should be volunteering to field grounders and receive throws in the dirt as soon as his hands can handle it, and the Mets should be open to seeing if his athleticism translates defensively to the position's demands.

Where do the youngsters fit in the batting order?  This is a more difficult question to answer.  Ewing is a classic leadoff hitter, but more and more teams look for more power as well as speed and contact at the top of the order.  Given how well he has done leading off, Benge is the likely lead off hitter.  Soto is the most patient hitter in the lineup.  He should return to the two spot. The more often Benge reaches first, the more fastballs he will see.  With Benge batting in front of him, Soto should have plenty of opportunities to drive runs in.  With Soto batting behind him, the more strikes Benge will see and the more selective he will be able to be as well.

Lindor and Bichette should bat third and fourth.  The question is, in which order.  While he still has plus speed, I would hit Lindor third and Bichette fourth as Lindor being on base does for Bichette what Benge's being on first does for Soto. Bichette came to the Mets with a stellar record of hitting with runners in scoring position.  This line-up configuration is designed to give him the best opportunity to live up to that reputation.

The Mets don't have a power bat other than Soto and the lineup should be designed to reflect the need to score runs in other ways. That's why I would be inclined to bat Ewing fifth and Polanco as the DH sixth. Again, Ewing on base in front of Polanco does for the latter what Lindor in front of Bichette and Benge in front of Soto do for the two of them.  This moves Semien to the seventh hole, with the 1B and catcher, completing the lineup. 

Only time will tell how good the youngsters become, but I think it's fair to say that the position player additions among them have given reason to believe that they will be plus defenders and at least major league average or better offensive players, especially if they can take advantage of their speed and contact skills.

All the young dudes may carry the news, but they cannot be expected to carry the load.

Start with the pitching staff.  I am not inclined to anoint any of the pitching prospects the Ace. All pitchers seem to lose a year to injury at some point, some sooner rather than later, some more than a year.  The most competitive teams have three number twos at least, each of whom flashes number one performance for some period of time during the season or over the course of a season or two.  

Whomever signs Skubal should understand that as well.  He has the physical presence of a 'horse on the mound' but he too will have his share of downs.  There are only a handful of true aces in baseball, but the length of time even they are likely to perform at that level has been reduced by the stress pitching to that standard game in and game out imposes mentally and physically.

I am all for pursuing Skubal, but what makes him worth the money is how high his floor is and how consistently he can rise above it. 

Of all the young Mets pitchers who can figure in the starting rotation of a championship contender, I am highest on Santucci, and have been from the start.  He needs more work and refinement, but he has dominant, nasty stuff and a bulldog mentality.  I want to believe that Scott and McLean have the same type of mentality.  They too need work.  Scott could use a change up with down and in movement to a right hander, and McLean throws too many pitches and needs more focus on quicker outs and less variety in the pitches he throws.  

I don't think fans understand how much of a change in his delivery Tong is in the midst of, and the extent of the reactions of his pitches to it. He doesn't even know how they will react yet.  

He is smart and dogged and he should be given enormous credit for changing his arm angle, something I had called for from the day I first saw him pitch.  By sometime next year, the trio of Scott, McLean and Tong will be the three number twos in the Mets starting rotation.  

The rotation needs veteran presence and Skubal would provide that at the top of the rotation.  If he is offered and signs an extension Holmes would provide the veteran presence in the middle of the rotation. The key point is that the young dudes need to be nested in a pitching staff anchored by veteran presence.

The back of the bullpen is strong but would be better still if another arm, preferably a power arm, is added to it.  If Ross throws more strikes, he can fit into that roll nicely. Williams is best when the pitcher that precedes him throws either left handed or with heat to burn, making his airbender even more dazzling by keeping hitters off balance.

And now for the holes that remain and meshing the players together as a unit

The Mets need a power bat. Period. There isn't a power bat among the youngsters who I have identified. Soto is good for 30, and Lindor 20+.  Semien, Benge, Bichette and Polanco all 15+.  Even on a team built on good speed, better contact and smarts, it really would help to have someone else who is good for 25+ homers (and isn't otherwise a black hole strike out waiting to happen).  

In case you've missed it, Alvarez is a black hole, as is Vientos. Both have suffered from extreme power outages. Baty has been given every chance and he is a better all around player than both of the other two, but he is no threat to hit it out of the park on a regular basis.

In my book we have two positions wide open for next year that we need to fill, and as many as four the year after.  Next year, 1B and catcher;  Year after, add DH and 3B if Bichette leaves as I expect he will.  

Can someone we find to fill those gaps also provide the necessary power boost?

How well our young players do overall next year and beyond depends a great deal on the make-up of the rest of the team.  The less pressure on them the better.  And this is where the pocket book and good judgment come into play.  Even more than you might think, because to be perfectly honest, there are no obvious solutions in the system at 1B, catcher, DH or 3B that are genuine power bats and just a stone's throw away from being major league ready.  So if we want the best from this group in the youth movement, we are going to have to supplement them with first rate talent at the holes that need filling. Hence the need for a massive pocket book.

And we should be focusing the deadline trades on building the next wave of youth in positions where we face likely gaps.  More on that next time, along with a few suggestions about where those gaps are likely to arise.


Steve Sica- Checking in on this First Round Draft Pick

Photo Courtesy of Diamond Images 

With the MLB Draft a month away, the Mets will have the 27th overall pick heading into it. They won't pick again until the third round with pick number 92. Last year, the Mets' first-round pick was 11 spots later at 38. They used that selection to get Mitch Voit, an infielder out of the University of Michigan. Let's check in on the Mets' latest top draft choice.

After the Mets drafted and signed Voit, they shipped him to Low-A St. Lucie, where he finished out the last month of the Low-A season. While his average dipped to .235 and his OPS didn't fare much better at .638, one thing fans and scouts alike noticed with Voit's speed. In those 22 games, Voit stole 20 bases and was only once. Another impressive metric that stood out during his short time in St. Lucie was his strikeout-to-walk ratio. At just 20 years old, Voit walked 13 times and struck only 22 times. Terrific plate discipline for someone his age. 

This has been a trend for the Mets over the last couple of seasons through their Minor League system. Drafted players that hit for more contact over power, and emphasizing patience, not pop, in the batter's box. Voit fits right into the system that the Met minor-league brass has been unveiling since Stearns took over before the 2024 season. 

Coming into 2026, Voit was promoted to High-A Brooklyn. The now 21-year-old would struggle in his first month, putting up an April slash line of .224/.314/.382, and sported an OPS of just .696. But once again, the speed was there as Voit stole 10 bases and was caught just once. It's not all that uncommon for players to have a hard time adjusting to High-A, especially in Brooklyn, where, during the cold months of April and May, the breeze off the ocean can turn even the best of hitters into feeble batters. 

Over the last month, though, Voit looks to be turning a corner; not only is he turning his season around, but he's putting up some of his best numbers as a pro. In his last 17 games, he's batting .250, has an OPS of .873, and is still carrying that blazing speed, swiping six bases over that time. 

Coming into this week, Voit is riding a seven-game on-base streak. In that span of games, his OPS sits at .983. He's also finding his power, blasting three home runs in his last ten games and finishing off the month of May with 11 RBIs, along with three double and three home runs. 

As the draft gets closer, the Mets will hope to find more success with their top pick, something that had been eluding them until 2024. Carson Benge, who the Mets took with the 19th pick that year, has been living up to his hype and then some. After a slow April, Benge is heading into the summer as a reliable leadoff hitter and one of the Mets' best offensive players this season, coming off a 5-for-5 game on Sunday in San Diego.

Mitch Voit is also catching fire as we enter the summer, and the Mets can only hope that another college-aged prospect will one day make a major impact with the big league club.