6/15/26

MACK - 2029 Mets Rotation: The Next Wave

 


The next wave of Mets starters seems to be developing right now on the Brooklyn Cyclone roster. Everyone that reads Mack’s Mets needs to become familiar with these three. They could all be part of the 2029 Mets rotation someday.

 


Nicolas Carreno is a 20-year-old left-handed pitching prospect in the New York Mets organization (born June 9, 2006, in Barcelona, Venezuela). He stands 5'10" and weighs 155 lbs. The Mets acquired him from the Pittsburgh Pirates in July 2024 in exchange for LHP Josh Walker.

Signed by the Pirates in 2023 as an international free agent. Split time in the DSL in 2024 before the trade.

Progressed through the Mets system: DSL → FCL (2025) → Low-A St. Lucie (2025–2026) → High-A Brooklyn Cyclones (promoted June 2026).

Key 2026 stats (through mid-June, across A and A+):  2–1 record, 1.89 ERA in 12 games (7 starts), 47.2 IP. 

67 strikeouts (12.7 K/9), 23 walks (4.3 BB/9), low home runs allowed. 

WHIP around 1.05, strong strikeout-to-walk rate, and low batting average against (~.160–.250 range). He has shown significant improvement in command and consistency since his high-walk early DSL days. In 2026, he has posted career-high strikeout numbers and performed well in a recent High-A debut (e.g., 6 IP, 9 K in one start).

Pitch Repertoire

Carreno throws from the left side with a three-pitch mix (primarily), showing good stuff for his age and size. Data from 2025 and scouting notes highlight:

4-Seam Fastball (primary, ~50% usage): Sits in the low-to-mid 90s (up to 96–98 mph in 2026). Good ride/vertical movement.

Slider (secondary, high-usage ~38%): His best pitch — hard (84–90 mph, up to low 90s), with strong whiff rates (e.g., 58%+ in samples; one report noted 43.8% whiff). Can be short or sweepy depending on grip/release. High spin and effectiveness against both sides.

Sinker (occasional, ~10–12%): Mid-90s velocity, used for ground balls or movement variation.

Some scouting/projection systems mention potential for a curveball or changeup (with future grades in the 30–50 range), but his current game mix centers on fastball/slider/sinker. He has solid extension and generates swings-and-misses, especially with the slider.

Profile summary: Carreno is a high-upside lefty starter prospect with strikeout stuff and improving command. At 20, he's still developing (especially control and secondary pitches), but his 2026 performance in full-season ball is encouraging. He's viewed as a lottery-ticket type with starter potential if he refines his arsenal and consistency. Keep an eye on his progress with Brooklyn in High-A.

 


José Chirinos is a 21-year-old right-handed pitching prospect (born October 16, 2004) in the New York Mets organization.

The Mets signed him as an international free agent from Venezuela in 2022. He stands 6'3" and 170 lbs with a lanky frame and a low three-quarters arm slot.

Chirinos has shown steady progress, especially in 2025–2026:2026 (St. Lucie, A): Strong results with a low-2s ERA, good strikeout numbers, and improved control (e.g., around 2.36–2.52 ERA in recent samples, ~10+ K/9, low WHIP ~1.05).

2025: Solid full-season debut in A-ball (3.20 ERA over 56+ IP) with better strike-throwing.

Earlier years (DSL/FCL) featured higher walk rates and inconsistency but promising strikeout stuff.

He projects as a starter with a chance to develop into a back-end rotation piece if command improves further.

Pitch Repertoire

Chirinos features a multi-pitch mix (typically 5–6 offerings), with data from 2025–2026 showing:

Sinker/Two-Seam Fastball (primary, ~25–50% usage): Averages ~92–93 mph (up to 94–95). It has decent velocity but average movement/spin; used more as a setup pitch for command and tunneling rather than a primary whiff pitch.

Slider (key secondary, ~15–20%+): His best swing-and-miss pitch. Sits high-70s to low-80s with slurvy shape, good horizontal sweep, and vertical break. High whiff rates (often 35–40%+ in samples).

Changeup (~20%): Mid-80s (wider velocity band, high-70s to high-80s). Arm-side fade; more effective at the lower end of the velo range. Decent whiff potential.

Cutter (~15–25%): Mid-to-high 80s. Limited movement on its own but helps tunnel with the fastball/slider. Often his least effective pitch by itself.

Four-Seamer and Curveball (occasional): Four-seam ~92–93 mph; curve in the high-70s with vertical shape. Used less frequently.

tjStuff+ metrics rate most of his pitches around average to slightly above (98–100+ range overall), with the slider and fastball variations showing promise.

Scouting Notes / Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths: Good feel for mixing pitches, solid strikeout ability (especially slider), improving command in recent seasons, and a projectable frame for velocity/stamina gains. He tunnels pitches well.

Areas to Improve: Fastball lacks elite movement at times; cutter can be hittable; overall command and consistency (walk rates have fluctuated). Needs to tighten secondaries as he climbs levels.

He's a developmental arm with upside—watch for continued polish in High-A and beyond. Stats and pitch data can vary by game, but the sinker-slider-changeup core defines him right now. For the latest, check MiLB.com or Baseball Savant game logs.

 


Daviel Hurtado is a left-handed pitching prospect in the New York Mets organization. Born January 26, 2005, in Havana, Cuba, he is 21 years old (as of mid-2026), listed at 6'1" and 166 lbs, and throws from a three-quarters arm slot. The Mets signed him as an international free agent in January 2023.

Hurtado missed 2023 with injury. His pro debut came in 2024 with the FCL Mets (Rookie ball), where he struggled with command and results (0-5, 6.32 ERA in 8 starts). He showed strong strikeout stuff (13.2 K/9) but walked too many.

In 2025, he improved dramatically: Strong showing in the FCL (1-0, 0.47 ERA in 5 starts).

Moved up to Single-A St. Lucie (0-2, 2.70 ERA in 13 games/7 starts).

Overall: 1-2, 2.06 ERA, 10.3 K/9, 3.3 BB/9 in 65.2 IP.

In 2026, he has split time between Single-A St. Lucie and High-A Brooklyn Cyclones. He has posted strong results overall in limited action (including a 0.50 ERA at High-A) with excellent command and strikeouts, though he dealt with a brief IL stint. He was also selected for Cuba's roster for the 2026 World Baseball Classic.

Key strengths: High strikeout rates (often 10+ K/9), improving command and control, and a solid strike-throwing ability. He has shown the ability to miss bats while limiting hard contact when everything is working.

Pitch Repertoire

Hurtado features a multi-pitch mix typical for a young lefty starter, with a fastball that plays up due to velocity and movement.

Fastball (primary pitch, ~50% usage): Sits low-to-mid 90s (90-94 mph), topping out at 96 mph. It has good induced vertical break (around 15 inches, averaging ~2,200 RPM). It's thrown with a slingy arm action from a three-quarters slot. Command is generally solid in the zone, though hitters can square it up when they make contact.

Curveball (~30% usage): Big, loopy "lollipop" pitch in the high-70s to low-80s. It has massive vertical break (around 50+ inches). Primarily used as a chase pitch outside the zone to generate swings-and-misses or weak contact/ground balls. It tunnels differently from his fastball.

Slider (~15% usage): "Slurvy" breaking ball in the mid-to-high 80s. Similar shape to the curve but tighter/harder with good horizontal movement. It has been effective for strikeouts and swing-and-miss.

Changeup (occasional): Used sparingly but shows promise as a third offspeed option with fade/separation from the fastball. It could become a more significant part of his mix for better tunneling and vs. opposite-handed hitters.

His breaking balls are generally thrown for chases rather than strikes, complementing a fastball that he can locate reasonably well. The arsenal gives him good potential as a starter, though consistency, durability, and further refinement (especially the changeup and overall command) will determine how high he climbs.

 

 

 

 

Paul Articulates - Just a few observations


The Mets just finished a pretty successful series against the Atlanta Braves, winning two of three from the team with the best record in MLB.  The Braves are a team full of bats that is fifth in baseball in both average and OPS and fourth in runs scored.

Hats off to the Mets’ pitching staff, who limited that formidable club to just 9 runs in three games.  The pitching was good from both the starters and relievers.  Starters threw 15 innings and gave up 5 runs, all earned.  Relievers threw 12 innings and gave up 4 runs, all earned.  The defense was up to the task, with only a pair of errors in those games that did not factor in the outcomes.  

The Mets hit the ball surprisingly well, racking up 27 hits in those three games.  They hit four solo home runs and one grand slam in spacious Citi Field where the warm air was thin and baseballs saw little resistance.

Do these upticks in both pitching and hitting, coupled with the pending return of Lindor, Mauricio, Taylor, and Senga this month project future success?  I don’t believe that is the case.  There are certainly some positive signs, but a good series does not represent a full turn-around from a dismal start.  The return of Lindor should help the team eventually, though he will have to get up to game speed.  The return of Mauricio and Taylor will cause some tough decisions on who will be released and who will be sent down, but will not materially impact the lineup.  And with Senga, it’s like a box of chocolates – you never know what you will get.

I think that the positives we should be taking from the Mets’ month of June are the play of their youngsters.  Both AJ Ewing and Carson Benge are now hitting above .250 and they are playing solid if not spectacular defense.  They are running the bases aggressively.  Jared Young, who at 30 years of age is young by MLB service time, is making a good argument for why he should remain the team’s starting first baseman.  Christian Scott is looking like the player we expected him to be before his injury and he provides hope every time he takes the mound.  These are the kind of players that you want surrounding veterans like Lindor and Soto.

I just hope that the return of the injured players does not change the entire dynamic through lineup changes and playing time adjustments.  There was a hint of fun in the dugout during this past series, and that is an essential element to playing loose with a clear mind.  That must remain for the team to play well.

As the Mets leave the pitching friendly confines of Citi Field for the hitter friendly Great American Ball Park, I don’t know whether to be excited or worried.  Great American has yielded more homers (111) this year than any other park in MLB.  The Mets certainly have a pitching edge against the Reds (3.85 ERA versus 4.85 ERA), but the Reds can out-slug the Mets.  With Christian Scott and Nolan McLean plus an opener scheduled to pitch against the Reds, we will have to see if the Reds can be held down.  Then it is off to Philadelphia to face another slugging team.



Reese Kaplan -- How Does the Lineup Look With Lindor and Polanco?


While the injuries have a lion’s share of the responsibility for the Mets last place record but it appears two of the major losses are drawing to a close.  If you believe the various stories appearing online all over the place, then you accept the projected June 20th return date for shortstop Francisco Lindor with apparently DH Jorge Polanco following shortly thereafter.  Given the unexpectedly positive results the team has gotten from utilityman Jared Young at first base and the fragility of the two healing injuries for Polanco, a DH assignment for the former Mariner makes the most sense.

So what do these returning players do to the current lineup?  With the multitude of injuries forcing the Mets hand causing promotions and substitute level players getting regular time in the 1-9 spots written out by manager Carlos Mendoza, it would appear there are going to be a number of changes made when the two who emerge from their rehabilitation return to the majors.

First of all, you have a number of players performing poorly.  In no particular order that list would include M.J. Melendez, Mark Vientos, Brett Baty and Eric Wagaman.  Assuming both Vientos and Baty have a modicum of residual trade value it would seem that Melendez and Wagaman are the fairly obvious choices to go to make room for Lindor and Polanco. 

Do remember that there are other players still on the IL, including Luis Robert, Tyrone Taylor and Ronny Mauricio.  None of them are pending for a near term return to the big club.  Of these three Taylor is arguably the most interesting as he is a free agent at year’s end and is more than serviceable as a defensive player though not nearly as skilled with the bat.  Robert is simply too injury prone to have the faith to bring him back for $20 million for 2027 and A.J. Ewing has shown skills with his glove, his legs and his bat to suggest he is now the center fielder for the future.  Ronny Mauricio is the toughest one to figure out.  He has no room on the roster anymore unless the Mets part ways with one or both of Vientos and Baty.


So how will the new look lineup shake out?  Here’s my take:

  • RF — Carson Benge
  • SS — Francisco Lindor
  • 3B — Bo Bichette
  • LF — Juan Soto
  • DH — Jorge Polanco
  • 1B — Jared Young
  • 2B — Marcus Semien
  • CF — A.J. Ewing
  • C — Francisco Alvarez

My thinking here is that Benge has been on fire after his ice cold start to his rookie season.  Moving him out of the leadoff spot would make little sense given his extended term success.  Lindor can slot in at number two giving you apparently two leadoff capable hitters in a row.  Bichette and his career .294 batting average seem to be a great place setter to bat third with slugger Juan Soto being the cleanup hitter and run producer.  After these slots it gets a little more a matter of lefty/righty alternate hitters (well, Polanco is a switch hitter).  You could flip flop Ewing and Alvarez which would not be as lefty/righty consistent, but it would then give you three leadoff type batters in a row if Ewing is at batting position number nine. 

What’s your take?

6/14/26

Tom Brennan - Let’s Play JEOPARDY! And….Plus/Minus


JEOPARDY? BEING OFF BALANCE ON A DOWNWARD-TILTING SEE-SAW 


Jeopardy - that great TV game show.

Jeopardy exists in baseball, too.

Mark Vientos, the first 12 days of June had a slash line of .000/.000./000. 

“This is jeopardy.”

Double Jeopardy? He was up just 12 times, fanning in half of them. 

After ending May on a 6 for 36 skid, with no walks.

Add the two together, and he is 6 for 48, with no walks. Egads!

Imagine what the Mets’ record might be right now if he was on base 10 more times in those last 48 PAs? 

Answer: BETTER.

Career Vientos WAR, excluding his 2024 solid season? 

A negative 2.4.

Jarred “the Terrible” Kelenic’s career WAR? A measly -0.1.

So, the two are essentially equally terrible. They have the measly measles.

Kelenic is again back down in AAA, trying to salvage his career.

That being said:

Why would someone trade for Vientos? 

They sure wouldn’t give much for him.

His Mets tenure is tenuous. Why? 

Lindor will be back probably in 11-14 days, I am guessing, based on Stearn’s latest assessment.

Francisco will need, and of course will get, an immediate roster spot. 

Mauricio, Roberts, and Polanco will be back soon, too, perhaps. 

Mark faces Quadruple Jeopardy, if you ask me.

Alex Trebek: “Sir…It’s your turn to select.”

Contestant: “I will take FAILURES for $400, Alex”.



PLUS/MINUS BLUES


Through Friday:

The Phillies had scored 20 fewer runs than their pitchers had allowed.

The Mets had scored 16 fewer runs than their pitchers had allowed.

Pretty even.

SO…WHY WERE THE METS TRAILING PHILLY BY 4.5 GAMES??

Maybe in part because:

Mark Vientos’ 2026 slugging % in two key and somewhat overlapping categories (a. 2 outs with RISP; b. Late and Close) is a putrid .220.

“Mark Vientos, your free trial period is nearly over.”


THE METS WILL NOT WIN IF…

…they do not score a lot more. 

They remain a miserable 27th in scoring, very close to being dead last.

The Mets are 9th overall in ERA, and 5th in pen ERA.

Bill Clinton agrees with me, “It’s the HITTING, stupid.”

If the Mets were 10th in runs scored, they’d have scored 50 more runs.

And instead of being 31-39, they’d be??? 

Probably 39-31.

Then, I’d actually watch meaningful games. Instead of tuning out.




Tom Brennan - Randy Jones Was A Genius…Back Then; And the Mets' Hottest Team


(pictured above: Randy Jones)

RANDY JONES ONCE UPON A TIME MAXIMIZED HIS VALUE…

BY USING HIS HEAD 


RANDY JONES WAS A GENIUS… BACK THEN: 

Kevin Kernan in 2021 wrote this about ultra-slow-hurling Randy Jones, whose last 2 career years were with the Mets, at age 31-32, when he went 8-18, 4.69 for truly bad early 1980s Mets teams:

KERNAN: “In 1976, the lefty (Jones) won 22 games, two years after losing 22 games. He started 40 games that season, having pitched 25 complete games over 315 1/3 innings. Those led the league as did the 274 hits he allowed, only 15 them home runs. He surrendered only 109 runs. He struck out just 93 batters. And he worked fast.

“Think about those 93 punchouts,’’ Jones proudly told BallNine. “Half of those had to be the other pitcher. I only struck out like 40 real hitters. If I struck you out, it wasn’t my fault, it was yours, you just missed it.’

Jones’ fastest fastball was 87 MPH. He would never throw it that hard.

“At 87 it would not sink, it would just tail,’’ he explained. “As soon as I’d drop it down to 81-82, then the ball would start sinking. I could throw 73 and the bottom would fall out of it and it would be in the same spot in the strike zone.

“I just changed speeds and my mechanics never changed. A lot of times I would throw a slider into a right-hander’s hands, and I would throw that harder than my fastball and they would look at me like: ‘How the hell are you getting in my kitchen?’ I’d throw the slider 83 and the fastball 78. It was fun setting up guys.

“I would wear out my spot out there on the outside corner, right below the kneecap. 

“I wouldn’t throw a strike the whole game sometimes. I didn’t have to. They would call that pitch a strike and they would keep swinging at it and it was over. Here we go. I’d just live out there.’’

He could pitch. Then he offered this 2021 reality.

“I don’t even know if I would get drafted today.  

“I don’t know about the analytics today. Either you can pitch or you can’t pitch.’’

My thoughts? Randy Jones could get away with being Randy Jones back when Randy Jones pitched. He pitched in a great park for pitchers, and came in first and second in the Cy Young Award tallies in consecutive seasons (1975, 1976).

In those seasons, the median team smacked just 111 home runs.

In 2025, the median team launched 184 home runs. Sixty six percent more.

Randy Jones would have been slaughtered in today’s game, pitching in a hitter neutral park. ERA above 5.00. 

Maybe 6.00, because in today’s game, far fewer balls are called strikes.

He was a genius, all right…for being born when he was. 

And for being a Padre in their great, big ballpark back then.


THE METS' HOTTEST TEAM...

...was the Mets' coldest team 3 weeks ago.

Brooklyn was a subterranean 11-31 in late May.

Since then, through Friday nite? Scorching. 13 wins in 18 games.

24-36 sounds a whole lot better than 11-31.

Still hitting below .200 as a team, the Brooklyn bats have nonetheless been much improved since that late May 11-31 nadir, with the team average rising nearly 20 points in that stretch. 

Pitching has been better, too, with the team ERA dropping sharply to 3.97.

Warmer weather a help?  Very possibly.

May they keep on keeping on.  They are OFFICIALLY THE HOTTEST.

They are scoring 4.1 runs per game, still lowest in what is this season definitely a hitters' league, through 60 games.  

Amazingly, if they can somehow score a mere 188 runs in game # 61, they will catch up to league scoring leader Greensboro, which has scored an insane 7.2 runs per game. 

I will leave you with this extreme, incomprehensible stat of the day: 

Greensboro has 112 HRs, six times as many as Jersey Shore, which has 19 HRs.


6/13/26

RVH - Rethinking the Mets, Part 6: Citi Field Is Still Part of the Problem

In Part 1, we argued that the Mets do not have an ambition problem. They have an execution problem.

In Part 2, we examined how slow starts create a pressure-amplification cycle that makes every season feel harder than it needs to be.

In Part 3, we explored how the Yankees learned to carry pressure through decades of stability and accumulated trust.

In Part 4, we examined how the Braves built resilience through development, continuity, and replacement power.

In Part 5, we looked at how the Dodgers use resources to create flexibility and optionality rather than simply accumulate talent.

Now we turn to something that may be less obvious but equally important.

The environment itself.

Because before deciding what the Mets should become, it's worth asking a simpler question:

Have the Mets fully adapted to the realities of where they play?

The answer may be no.

Every Great Organization Understands Its Environment

The Yankees understand Yankee Stadium.

The Braves understand Truist Park.

The Dodgers understand Dodger Stadium.

They understand how their ballparks play.

They understand how their climates affect performance.

They understand how their environments influence roster construction.

And over time, they build around those realities.

The Mets should be doing the same thing.

Because Citi Field is not neutral.

And pretending otherwise ignores a meaningful part of the equation.

Citi Field Is A Different Baseball Environment

The Yankees and Mets both play in New York.

But they do not play the same game.

Yankee Stadium remains one of baseball's most favorable offensive environments, particularly for left-handed power hitters.

A fly ball down the right-field line has a chance.

A struggling hitter can find confidence with one swing.

Marginal contact can become meaningful production.

The ballpark creates offense.

Citi Field often demands offense.

Especially in April.

The dimensions are larger.

The alleys are deeper.

The outfield is bigger.

The air is frequently heavier.

The margin for error is smaller.

A ball that leaves Yankee Stadium may become a long out in Queens.

Over 162 games, talent generally wins.

Over shorter stretches, environment can influence outcomes.

And those shorter stretches matter.

Why April Feels Different In Queens

This brings us back to one of the recurring themes of the series.

Slow starts.

The issue isn't simply temperature.

Both teams play in New York.

Both deal with cold weather.

The difference is how those conditions interact with the ballpark.

Citi Field sits in a more open environment near Flushing Bay and the waterfront.

Spring winds can be unpredictable.

Cold air suppresses carry.

Offense often feels harder to generate consistently.

Again, none of this determines a season.

But it can influence one.

And when offensive struggles emerge early, they often trigger the pressure cycle discussed in Part 2.

Expectations rise.

Runs become scarce.

Frustration grows.

The media amplifies it.

Players press.

The conversation shifts.

A baseball problem becomes an organizational problem.

That doesn't mean Citi Field causes slow starts.

It does mean the environment may contribute to conditions where slow starts become more likely.

The Mets Have To Stop Thinking Like The Yankees

This may be the most uncomfortable point in the article.

For years, many Mets teams have been constructed as though they played somewhere else.

Too often, the roster blueprint has leaned heavily toward:

  • aging power

  • station-to-station offense

  • limited athleticism

  • limited defensive range

  • limited speed

In many ways, those teams looked better suited for Yankee Stadium than Citi Field.

But Citi Field rewards different things.

Athleticism.

Defense.

Versatility.

Outfield range.

Run prevention.

Gap power.

Pitching depth.

The Mets don't necessarily need fewer stars.

They may need stars whose strengths align more naturally with the environment they play in.

New York Creates A Different Kind Of Friction

The ballpark is only part of the story.

The broader environment matters too.

Taxes.

Media scrutiny.

Cost of living.

Travel demands.

Lifestyle preferences.

Family considerations.

The Yankees have spent decades building enough organizational credibility to overcome many of those factors.

The Dodgers increasingly enjoy similar advantages.

The Braves benefit from a different set of market dynamics altogether.

The Mets must continue building enough organizational strength that players view those challenges as worthwhile tradeoffs.

That process takes time.

History Matters Too

The final piece of environmental friction isn't physical.

It's psychological.

Every Mets team inherits forty years of unfinished business.

Every season begins with expectations.

Every losing streak revives memories.

Every disappointment reopens old conversations.

The Yankees begin with trust.

The Braves begin with continuity.

The Dodgers begin with credibility.

The Mets still begin with questions.

Fair or not, that's reality.

And reality must be managed.

What Great Organizations Do

The Yankees did not eliminate pressure.

The Braves did not eliminate randomness.

The Dodgers did not eliminate uncertainty.

They adapted to their environments.

They built systems that function despite those realities.

They turned obstacles into considerations rather than excuses.

That's the challenge facing the Mets.

Not changing Citi Field.

Not changing New York.

Not changing history.

Adapting more effectively to all three.

What The Mets Should Learn

Championship organizations do not assume their environment is neutral.

They understand it.

They build around it.

They use it.

And occasionally, they turn it into an advantage.

The Mets have spent the first six years of the Cohen era investing heavily in talent, infrastructure, and organizational capability.

The next step may be ensuring those investments are fully aligned with the realities of where they actually play.

Because if Citi Field creates a different baseball environment than many competing parks, the obvious question becomes:

Have the Mets consistently built rosters optimized for that environment?

That may be one of the most important questions of all.


Part 6 Thesis

The Mets operate in a baseball environment that is different from many of their competitors.

Citi Field, early-season conditions, New York pressure, and organizational history all create friction.

Championship organizations do not ignore friction.

They understand it, adapt to it, and build around it.


What We've Learned So Far

Part 1: The Mets do not have an ambition problem. They have an execution problem.

Part 2: The Mets' slow-start problem is not a standings problem. It is a pressure-amplification problem.

Part 3: The Yankees did not eliminate pressure. They learned how to carry it.

Part 4: The Braves win because they reduce randomness better than almost anyone else.

Part 5: The Dodgers do not use money to buy certainty. They use money to create flexibility.

Part 6: Championship organizations understand their environment and build around it.


Next: Part 7 – The Difference Between a Headline Team and a Championship Team

If Citi Field rewards a different style of baseball than many competing parks, then the next question is unavoidable: Have the Mets consistently built teams optimized to win in their own environment, or have they too often built teams designed to win the offseason?


Tom Brennan - What Are the Odds?


The Happy Recap!  Hoo, Hoo, Hoo!

Randy Guzman has been a slugger for the St Lucie Mets.

So l glanced at a DSL Mets box score, and their starting pitcher fanned 6 in 3.2 scoreless innings. His name? 

Randy Guzman. Different guy, same name.

Guzman is a common name. For instance, the Mets have a reliever named Carlos Guzman in AA who fanned 3 in 1.1 IP Friday night. 

But two guys named RANDY Guzman? 

What are the odds?

Anyway, Bashing Bo Bichette answered his detractors on Friday night against Hot Lanta, with 2 homers against Spencer Strider, totaling 6 RBIs for the evening. 8 HRs and 40 RBIs on the year. Soto cracked # 15.

Devin Williams was sharp with a save in the 7-5 win. Every Nets fan can remember blown Nets saves against the Braves over the years. Not tonight.

One pesky Braves batter fouled off about eight pitches and then singled, raising those “oh no, here we go again” worries, but Williams mowed thru the other 3 hitters, including a game ending K of Olson.

In the minors:

Syracuse was limited to 3 hits and one run in a loss.  Nate Lavender lost in relief, but he sure strikes out lots of guys. On the stick side, Morabito and Senga each fanned 3 times, and Clifford slipped to .210.

In Binghamton, Suero (.191) and Lorusso (.212) each cracked their 10th of the season in a win in which the Rumblers scored 7 on 8 hits and 8 walks. In the other side,. Santucci was wild, but Bingo pitching racked up 15 Ks.

Brooklyn scored 13 runs on 10 hits. Houck is hitting well since June 2, and is up to .212. Mosquera got 2 RBIs and raised his average to .099 in Brooklyn.

Daviel Hurtado was excellent over 5 innings. The 21 year old has a 0.70 WHIP over 28 IP this year. 

St Lucie won, 2-1.

Finally…

The FCL Mets got 4 hitless innings from young Camden Lohman. He fanned six and walked one.