Showing posts with label Tom Brennan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Brennan. Show all posts

6/3/26

Tom Brennan - Mets Minor Guys Who Fan Too Much; Holmes Return Strategy; Alvarez & Bo

“WOW! THERE IS SUCH A SWISHY BREEZE DOWN HERE!”

 

One clear and present danger to minor league hitters is striking out too much.

I used the example the other day of former Mets minor leaguer Luke Ritter, who a few years back in AAA hit 29 homers and drove in 93 runs in 134 games, which was a “WOW”, and would really project out to big #s if projected over 162 AAA games. 

He, however, played exactly 0 (zero) games in the major leagues. Why? 

He struck out way too much. 174 times in 134 games that season.

I can name MANY K KINGS who never, or barely, made it. 

K’S KILL KAREERS!

Former Mets prospect 3B Aderlin Rodriguez never made the major leagues 

In his case, however, he put up good minor league power and hitting stats, and didn’t strike out too much. He just never quite made it. 

What A Rod did make, though, was the Asian pro leagues, where he extended his pro career. Did that happen because he did not strike out too much, making him attractive to Asian leagues? Yes, I’d speculate.

His total career, in the minors and foreign ball, totals 344 HRs and 1,250 RBIs. In that respect, he’s done very well for himself. 

However, if his strikeouts were 30% to 50% higher, he would most likely not have gotten that (presumably reasonably lucrative) foreign opportunity.

Circling back to Mets minor leaguers, which guys this year are falling into what I consider the danger zone, which I arbitrarily set at 1.25 strikeouts per game or higher?  (Based On Stats Thru Sunday) 

I want to name each of them, not because I want to vilify them, but because I want them to succeed. 

After all, AJ Ewing fanned 20 times in 132 PAs in AAA this year, but 24 times so far in 74 PAs (thru Sunday) with the Mets - twice the rate. That MLB pitching is SO MUCH TOUGHER.

How will the fanning prospects below succeed? Only ONE way:

Cut the Ks down, by a whole lot, by any means possible. 

Or become the next non-MLB Luke Ritter, if they even get that far.


Below, I count 8 whiffers extraordinaire + two top 30 prospect near misses:

AAA

Ryan Clifford: 78 Ks in 55 games.

Cristian Pache: 67 Ks in 51 games. (Former major leaguers).

The duo added FIVE MORE K’S on Tuesday.

AA

Chris Suero: 57 Ks in 41 games.

(Two top 30 dudes, Serrano and Reimer, are both under 1.25 Ks per game, but have combined for 101 Ks in 86 games, so they are uncomfortably close (1.18) to that 1.25.  Frankly, too close).

HIGH A

Colin Houck: 75 Ks in 43 games (red alert).

(In 2015, Jeff McNeil in High A, by comparison, fanned 59 times in 119 games.)

Corey Collins: 49 Ks in 36 games.

Yonaton Henriquez: 43 Ks in 25 games (red alert)

Yohairo Cuevas: 48 Ks in 36 games.

FULL A

Simon Juan: 53 Ks in 36 games.


That is 571 Ks in 409 combined games for the 10 players above.

And 470 Ks in 323 combined games for the eight of the 10 above dudes in the “1.25+ Club”. That’s an average of 1.46 Ks for these eight gents. Over 162 games, that would work out to 237 Ks per 9.

FCL

NO ONE striking out at high rates! Whoo Hoo! 


There are a boatload of other Mets minors guys who are fanning less than 1.25 times per game, but fan more than once per game, which is still a prospect’s real danger zone.

In some cases, they just don’t have that “it” to be a major league talent.

Sometimes, tho’, hitters may be too selective, trying too hard for walks.

Maybe they’d rather choke than choke up on two strikes.

Not most of the hitters in Syracuse. 

They are swingers who are dead last in walks, with over 10% fewer than the second lowest team. But they are 13th out of 20 in runs.

Binghamton? It is second highest in walks in its league, but dead last in hitting by a country mile at .201. Hit a lot more, walk a lot less, I suggest.

Brooklyn? Basket case. 

Last by a wide margin in both walks and batting average (.188). (But the average, it should be noted, is inching up). And the Cyclones are leading the league in hitter Ks. MAKE…CONTACT.

St Lucie?  

Almost last in walks, but 5th out of 10 teams in scoring, Ks, and homers. Smart guys down there, those hitters.

FCL Mets? 

Good, too. Bottom half in Ks and walks, 6.4 runs per game through 18 games.


If you are going to fan a lot, perhaps you should find another line of work.

It won’t get you to the majors. Trust me.


Syracuse, Binghamton, and Brooklyn combined for 12 hits.



Looking ahead…what’s the plan, Monsieur?

“I SAY, HOLMES…”

This is Clay Holmes’ MLB injury update:

Injury: Fractured right fibula
IL date: May 16 (60-day IL)
Expected return: August
Status: Fractured his leg on a comebacker May 15. 

Will need 6-8 weeks to heal.

Will need another six or so weeks for a Spring Training-style build-up.

That should take him well past the All-Star break in a best-case scenario.


MY QUESTION REGARDING MY “CLAY HOMIE”?

Should the Mets, who are paying Holmes $13 million this year, cut the length that rehab time by a month (returning roughly in mid-July instead of mid-August), by having him return not as a fully stretched out starter, but instead as a reliever of fine pedigree? 

Fewer innings to get back to the Mets, gradually stretching out after he returns to the Mets. 

Staying committed to him starting next year, of course.

- Makes great sense to me. His early return would be quite a “relief”.


ALVAREZ OUT OF REPAIR SHOP:

Alvarez shocking baseball again tonight by healing from his meniscus injury at super human speeds and catching the game in AAA tonight. Doubled TWICE! 

The rest of Syracuse, Binghamton, and Brooklyn hitters totaled 10 hits. 

Ten.  Just ten. The Suckitude (my word) is astonishing.


 I LOVE THE DSL METS BLUE  -  THEY HIT LIKE TYSON:

Trailing 9-0 early in their second season game today, the DSL Blue Bombers of the Mets  rallied a mighty long way to win 15-14. 

They also scored 7 runs in the last 2 innings of their first game, making it 22 runs scored in their last 11 innings. Love that offense! 

Demote Bo to the DSL, bring up a real DSL bat to replace him. Why Bo?

Because…

BO BLOWS:

How frankly can the $42 mil per year Baffling Bo be hitting .219, with a sickly .271 OBP, through June 2? 

Even Vientos (.219), Semien (.225), and Baty (.233) are not as bad.

It is called Suckitude. 

Suck on THAT.





6/2/26

Tom Brennan - I Want Players That Want It THIS BAD; Dodger Dummies

The NBA’s Victor Wembanyama Soars Above the Rest

 

7’5” Victor Wembanyama is the greatest current player in the NBA, leading his Spurs team into what will be a cataclysmic NBA Final series, against a scorching NY Knicks squad that is trying for their first NBA title since 1973.

Right after the Spurs’ game 7 win against awesome OKC on OKC’s home court, Victor said three incredibly powerful things:

“Winning the championship trophy, it’s a childhood dream, and having a real shot at it, having a chance, a tangible chance at winning it, realizing a dream…It’s a lifetime chance. You never know when it’s gonna happen again. The day we win it, speaking for myself, it’s gonna be an amazing day of realization of the dream.” 

“It’s hard to put into words. It’s almost like the meaning of my life.”

“I want to win so bad. It’s like my life depends on it.”

Victor isn’t just tall…he is multi-gifted, and works SO incredibly hard to achieve excellence in every conceivable offensive and defensive aspect of his game to make his team the best team it can be.

Listen to those words…who wants to win more than Extraterrestrial Victor?

Did I say he was 22? Not yet? OK, I will say it again, then…he is just 22.

Which Mets players do you feel have at least close to that comprehensively intense inner drive?

I see Soto; Lindor; Benge; Ewing for the hitters. 

But none quite as consumed with excelling as Vic, in my mind.

Mets’ Pitchers with an intense drive to be their absolute best? 

I can say, but I want to hear from YOU.


FROM DEAD IN THE WATER - TO HOT! THAT’S BASEBALL FOR YA!

The Mets were swallowing water and flailing in rapids. But a sand bar opened up, and the sunshine broke out. Blazing hot sun. Four straight, through Sunday. The paddles worked…the cadaver is alive again. But can the pulse sustain itself out west?

We will see. Big break for Mets: Cal Raleigh is out with an oblique.

Still, the Mets lost Monday night, 3-2, on just 2 hits…a 425 foot Jared Young HR to break up an no-hitter, and a Marcus Semien lined HR. 

The Mets were a little too “efficient” - their only other base runner was MJ Melendez on a HBP. 

GOOD NEWS: Mets’ bats arrive in Seattle at 9 AM today, via Fed X. 

Six Mets’ pitchers allowed just 4 hits in the loss. Sean Manaea pitched a fine 5 innings of one run ball, allowing just a solo HR. He seems to finally be getting untracked, a good sign.


EVEN THE DODGER’S “CHILL” FANS TURN HATEFUL

Saw this in Breitbart:

“Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Tanner Scott and his family received death threats from fans after a recent loss to the Philadelphia Phillies, the pitcher’s wife revealed on social media.”

I won’t repeat the threats here. So many sickos these days.

“In the game, Scott took the mound in the eighth inning of Saturday’s game against the Phillies as the Dodgers fought to hold on to a 3-1 lead. However, things did not go well for the reliever, who surrendered three earned runs and Philadelphia held on to win the game, 4-3.”

“On the season, Scott is 1-2 with a 2.19 ERA over 24.2 innings pitched.”

2.19 ERA?  AND HE GETS THREATS??

Classy fans from 60+ years ago many times went to games wearing suits and ties, and in many cases, a chapeau. 

But somewhere along the way, civilization died.  Felony assaults in NYC, I just read, are up 44% since 2019.  Make sure to lock those doors and windows. And whatever you do, don’t pitch for the Dodgers.


5/31/26

Tom Brennan - Embarrassing Mets OFF-base Percentages; And Awful Mets Subs’ Hitting

 

ARE METS HITTERS EMBARRASSED WITH THEIR SUNKEN OBP’S?

So, the Mets moved on from 3 key hitters from the prior half decade this past winter - Pete Alonso, Brandon Nimmo, and Jeff McNeil.

Their career on base percentages as Mets?

Nimmo: .364

McNeil: .351

Alonso: .341

Collectively excellent.

This year, through Wednesday, Juan Soto (.392 OBP) has been scorching since the frigid early season warmed up, and after his recovery from injury. 

Stop nitpicking and criticizing him - he is great.

Other Mets’ OBPs this season? 

Miserable. They would be OK if they were batting averages and not OBPs.

Tyrone Taylor .210

Ronny Mauricio .219

Jorge Polanco .246

Mark Vientos .261

Marcus Semien .264

Luis Torrens .266

Bo Bichette .273

Brett Baty .306

Look at those putrid OBPs, and then realize that the lowest team OBP last year was .293. 

The Mets team OBP this year, through Wednesday? .292.

Well, they do lead the majors in OFF BASE PERCENTAGE.

And…

The new kids are embarrassing the others not named Soto:

Carson Benge .310

Andrew “AJ” Ewing .350


SOMETIMES, I JUST CANNOT GET OVER HOW…

…poorly Mets call ups and part timers hit, each and every year.

This year, 4 called-up hitters - Ibanez, Morabito, Senger, and Pham - combined to go a sickly 1 for 40 through Thursday, with 20 Ks. 

 - Nick Morabito went 0-11, with 9 Ks! 

Last year’s Flopping Foursome - Senger, Young, Mullins, and Siri - in 268 at bats produced just 45 hits (.167).

In 2024, Omar Narvaez and DJ Stewart combined to go 38 for 223 (.170). 

In 2023, Almonte, Nido, Arauz, and Mendick combined for 28 for 195 (.143).

In the 101 win of 2022, you remember, the season the Mets lost the division in a tiebreaker, an incredible 14 hitters hit under .200, going a combined 123 for 690 (.178). 

 - Would they have won 110 games if those guys hit .228?

In 2021, it was Cameron Maybin going 1 for 28, while Khalil Lee and Albert Almora chipped in a combined 7 for 70. That’s a combined 8 for 98 (.081).

Question:

Is the pressure of hitting on the Mets unlike that of any other team?


METS WIN THIRD STRAIGHT, INCLUDING SCOTT’S 1ST MLB WIN

6-1 win - final. Christian Scott dazzled for 5 innings, fanning 8 to secure the win. Very promising about Scott.

Minor league Mets teams also all won, except for a close loss by Syracuse punctuated by a bad Jack Wenninger outing. A nice day.


MORE A&Q

ANSWER: 73-38

QUESTION: What is Zach Wheeler’s record after leaving the Mets?

Hey, I don’t know about you, but I am sure glad that Wheeler went to one of our key rival teams. 

How about you?


2/26/24

Mets Prospect Profile: OF Brandon McIlwain

Photo of Brandon McIlwain

We asked our readers about which prospects get little attention on our site. Jett Williams? He receives non-stop Mack's Mets writers' attention, and for good reasons.  Future star.

Others are good, but get far less attention in print. The readers offered up 10 such names they would like to hear more about.  So we obliged in a 10 article series that starts today.  The articles were individually written by 4 of our writers (Mack, Reese, Paul, and me).

One of those 10 players, who missed my “Productive Top 35 Prospects” list from October, was Brandon McIlwain. In that Top 35, I wrote up some honorable mentions. Guys who almost made it on the list.

I wrote this about McIlwain in October:

“Had I not added several DSL guys to the top 35, the list could have included a guy like Brandon McIlwain (.247/.356/.393, 20 steals), but while the 25 year old had a decent offensive season in AA and AAA, "decent" does not get you to the big leagues.  He needs to get a lot better, and do it fast, given his age.  But, despite being 5 years older, he had a whole lot better year than Alex Ramirez.”

Back in mid-2022, I also wrote this:

Brandon is having a very solid year, but turned 24 in July.  Between A and AA, Brandon is a very solid .279/.364/.446 this year.

He turns 26 on Memorial Day weekend this year. He was a 26th rounder in 2019 with the Marlins, but didn’t sign. He was too busy playing football and baseball in college, and that undoubtedly slowed his baseball college development. He played in some college age and indy leagues and also played in college, where he only hit about .235 in 117 games. But he was athletic. Foosball players usually are.

He signed as a free agent in the Mets in 2020.

In 2020, it is obvious that he didn’t play due to COVID.  Dang.

THAT is how you get to be turning 26 this season on May 31 and still be in the minors.

He has stolen a very solid 43 of 60 as a pro. I look at his .243/.356./393 in 551 plate appearances in 2023, with just 119 Ks, though, and think, nah, not gonna make it. 

But he missed a year plus. And played just 172 games in 2021 and 2022, due to injuries and whatnot.

Had he played that year plus, and not then missed roughly 75 more games in 2021 and 2022, how much better would his 2023 have been? I’m guessing .300/.400/.500.  

He’s only played 300 games in the minors, and his theme song must be the Beatles’ “Getting Better All the Time.”

In 2023, he hit a frosty .206 in a Binghamton in frosty April there. When it warmed up in May, he hit .275 from May 1 into early August, and then got promoted. In AAA, he hit just .219, but with a fine .382 OBP in 43 games, and stole 11 of 12. 

FIELDING:

"I know he can core an apple", Ralph Kramden told me. "But can he field?", I asked. "Oh, he can field that apple", Ralph replied. 

In point of fact: ten assists and just 4 errors playing all 3 outfield positions in 2023 is impressive. The righty hitting, righty throwing Brandon is a superior athlete.

CONCLUSION:

Hard to read McIlwain, in terms of his eventually being a future major leaguer, but he seems to be coming “subtly fast.” I think he gets there, due to his speed, fielding prowess, and excellent ability to get on base.

I speculate he won’t be called up in 2024, unless it breaks just right for him, but by the end of 2024, we might find ourselves saying: 

“Hey, McIlwain could well be a 4th or 5th outfielder in 2025.” 

After all, he fields well, is athletic at 6’0” 205, and gets on base a LOT. 

Brandon's 2023 stats were very similar to Brandon Nimmo’s in 2015, and Brandon Nimmo has improved so much since then. Why not the other Brandon, McIlwain, too?


Great article on McIlwain - clear from it that he is strong and a fine athlete.


https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2022/10/20/new-york-mets-brandon-mcllwain-fall-league/



3/17/22

Tom Brennan - Observations About Mets' Players Who Debuted in 2021 and in a Few Other Recent Years

How I feel when a hot Mets prospect makes a fine debut like Tylor Megill did in 2021

I had written an article recently about Mets' international players and the clearly discernible matter that the Mets acquire, through free agency and via trade, more impact major leaguers than they develop through their system.

Which got me thinking about players debuting in the majors in 2021.  Of course, I am most interested about Mets' players making their debuts, and there were 7 who did so in 2021:

But it led me to Google "players who made their MLB debut in 2021", which led me to a very interesting Baseball Reference page, listing a sortable list of all such players in the major leagues in 2021.

It turns out there were 265 players who made their MLB debuts in 2021, which on one hand seems like a lot, but looked at in comparison to how many players are drafted, or signed without being drafted, in 2021, it is clear that the vast majority of signees never make the big leagues.

265 players averages out to 9 per team.  The Mets only had 7, while a team like Arizona, that scuffled more and operated on a relatively limited budget, debuted 16 guys.  If you can't be good, at least give the fans a lot of fresh faces to get to know.

The Mets' 7 debuting players included 3 players drafted by the Mets (Megill, Mazeika, and Szapucki), 4 players drafted by other teams (Fargas, Hager, Bostick, and Khalil Lee), and NONE of their international signings.  None, as in ZERO.  Sad statement.  

Of the above 7, only Megill had a substantial impact.  In fact, he was 25th out of the 265 in WAR (0.8).  

The other 6 who debuted had a combined -0.6 WAR.   Compared to the Mets' rookies' combined 0.2 WAR, Cincinnati debuting players had a combined 7.0 WAR.

The highest WAR in 2021 was Jonathan India who came in at 3.9 WAR.  Pete Alonso had a much higher WAR in his 2019 rookie season - 53 HRs and 120 RBIs will do that for ya.

The Mets, as per the list, only drafted or otherwise initially signed only 5 of the 265 players who debuted in 2021, which is another sad statement regarding their player identification, signing, and development, don't you think?  

The 4 drafted were Megill, Szapucki, Mazeika, and Kelenic, and the one signed outside of the draft was Alberto Baldonado (who??). Geesh, very little MLB impact from those 5, huh?  Baldonado and Kelenic combined for an unhelpful -2.3 WAR with their non-Mets teams.

By comparison, the Dodgers, who've generally had lower draft spots than the Mets over the past several years, had 6 undrafted players signed, and 9 players that they drafted, debut in the majors in 2021, a total of 15 guys vs. the Mets' 5.  Wow, that is an awfully indicting picture, isn't it?

Overall, of the 265 debutantes, 198 debuting players (75%) were drafted, while the remaining 67 (25%) were signed outside of the draft.  Of the 67, seven were U.S. signees, 6 were Asian/Aussie signees, and 54 were Latin American signees.   So, on average nearly 2 Latino, non-U.S. players debuted, a little less than 2 per team.  So, when the Mets sign roughly 15 bonus international free agents each year, most likely only 2 will make the big leagues.

Before I go, the 2015 list showed the cumulative WAR of players debuting that season.  Correa had 34 WAR to top the list, Lindor a close second with 31, and Syndergaard and Conforto came in 9th and 10th on the list with almost 16 WAR apiece.  Steve Matz was 25th on the list with just under 10 career WAR.  (The Mets had 9 drafted players debut that year).

Adjusting for 2020 as a 40% season, only 34 players debuting in 2015 have compiled career WARs averaging 1.0 per year or better.  So that tells me when you get players who can crank out 2 or 3 WAR per year, ya done real good with them.

So, for instance, please consider that Jeff McNeil is indeed above average.  In point of fact, despite a late 2018 debut and a weak 2021 season, he is 5th overall in career WAR amongst the 2018 debutantes.  Top 2% is danged good, bruh, and mighty fine, ma'am.

Also, only 139 players had even as much as 0.1 career WAR or more out of 255 who debuted in 2015; the other 116 had career WAR of 0.0 or negative.  And only 93 of the 255 had total career WAR of 1.0 or better.  It's a tough game, folks.

One can hope for three things as I put down my quill:

1) The Mets start producing more (and more impactful) players to debut each year.

2) Lindor returns to his top tier WAR status in 2022.

3) We have more seasons where, after 6 years in the majors, the Mets' signed and drafted list has 3 players in the top 25 in total career WAR for their class, with 2 of them in baseball's top 10, as they did in 2015, when the Mets' future looked far more bright and promising than it turned out to be in 2016-21.

P.S. Actual spring training games almost here.  I hear that Dom Smith did some damage against Scherzer yesterday - if true, a promising sign of a bounce back Dom.


3/10/22

Tom Brennan - Mets' Franchise Troughs and Peaks - and in 2022, Baseball is Meant to be Played

 


No one likes a crummy trough - especially long-suffering, diehard Mets fans


BEFORE MY ARTICLE:

BASEBALL IS MEANT TO BE PLAYED. NOT REMINISCED ABOUT.

The Moo Goo Gai Pandemic is over, a miserable war in Ukraine is raging, gas and groceries are soaring, and folks here just want to return to normal, which is a springtime of baseball and sunshine.  Those idiots sure know how to muck things up, huh?

The Post reported that "Opening Day has been pushed back to April 14 at the earliest, but a league official did not rule out the possibility of a 162-game schedule."

IDIOTS, MORONS, AND IMBECILES.

JUST SETTLE IT - I DON'T CARE HOW.


Anyway, as any investor will know from experience, the stock market has troughs, when the market flounders, and has peaks, when it soars.

Some investors spend more time flailing in the troughs than others, and less at the peaks than others.

The Mets, IMO, have had too many troughs and too few peaks.

Trough #1 - the Birthing Trough.

 - In 1962-68, the Mets went 394-737, a whopping 343 games under .500.



Peak #1 - One World Series Win, One World Series Loss

- In 1969-1976, the Mets had just one losing season, and won it all in 1969 behind Tom Seaver against an Orioles juggernaut and almost won in 1973 against baseball's two powerhouse teams, defeating the Reds but barely losing to the As.  They went 670-619 (.520) in those 8 seasons.  Mediocre, except for 100-62 in 1969.

Only the two World Series appearances made this a low peak stretch as the Mets disappointingly were only a mediocre 13 games over .500 in the 7 years after the 1969 Miracle. 

Trough #2 - the post-Seaver hangover period.

The Mets were an abysmal 434-641 from 1977-1983.  Lovable Losers Return.  The only thing that saved them in this period was the 1981 strike year that wiped out 59 games, holding them down to 62 losses that year, but still 21 games below .500.  

This trough period was so bad, during the 6 full seasons in that stretch, the Mets never won more than 68 games.  Seaver returned later in that period, but even a prime-time Seaver, which he no longer was by then, could not have saved this woeful bunch of offensively challenged teams.

Peak #2 - the swagger years of 1984-1990.

One incredibly hard World Series win in 1986, matched with an incredibly painful NL Championship Series loss in 1988.  Loaded with incredible talent starting in 1984, the failure of management/ownership to make this a more enduring elite group  kept what many thought would be a decade-long, or longer, dynastic period to just 7 seasons of relatively modest success.

The near-dynasty, considering the talent on the team, was also thwarted by 2 other factors: 

1) incredible pitching performances by opponents in 1984 (16-1Cub acquiree Sutcliffe), 1985 (20-1 Tudor just after Memorial weekend), 1987 (Tudor part 2), and 1988 (unhittable Hersheiser), and 

2) self-destructive partying - where was no-nonsense Gil Hodges when you needed him?  He would have left shoe polish stains from boots in the derriere on a bunch of players.

This incredible period, though, included great Mets pitcher win-loss seasons from Doc (24-4), Cone (20-3), and Ojeda (18-5).  

666 wins, 466 losses.  So many fine players, incredibly hard to believe that 7-year stretch did not yield more post-season activity.

Trough #3 - the 6-year morass of 1991-96.

A trough epitomized in my mind by the Mets' BB problem - passing on superstar Barry Bonds, but signing the lesser Bobby Bonilla

348-443 = 7 years of yuck, although a few great performances individually over short periods by the likes of Lance Johnson and Bernard Gilkey.  No playoffs, lots of misery, plenty of villains.  Especially painful, considering the crosstown Yanks were beginning their long reign of success, relevance, and dominance, and their collection of jewelry and trophies.

Peak #3 - 1997-2001 - a solid 5 year stretch at 449-362.

Two playoff appearances, winning 3 rounds, but not reaching the World Series in 1999 and then losing it to the Clemens batting-hurling Yankees in 2000.  This was a brief and modest peak period with 2 strong seasons and 3 mediocre ones, tainted by remaining the # 2 team in town.

Trough #4 - 2002-05 - 295-351.

Not a steep trough, and it ended relatively quickly due to the emergence of two arriving young Mets studs, Wright and Reyes.  But no playoff trips - while, crosstown, the post-season party just kept rolling.

Peak #4 - 2006-08 - 274-212.  

A disappointing success period, with one playoff round win in 2006, when the 97 Mets wins were widely regarded as having a real shot at winning it all.  The late collapses of 2007 and 2008 were painful - don't make me re-live those.  It made many of us puke in a trough.  

The Mets' unwillingness to bust the cap always kept the Mets short of the promised land.  The Bronx team spent with little regard to busting through the cap.  They won a lot more, didn't they?

Trough #5 - 2009-2014 - 453-522. 

Malaise - enough talent to win between 70 and 79 games over each of those 6 years - while the Yanks continued to rub it in crosstown.   Towards the end, Reyes was gone, Wright was deteriorating, and (with hope) the Mets' pitching studs were arriving.  

Ownership was financially strapped and failed to adequately invest in this team, and the results showed it. Teams with 70-79 wins do not reach the playoffs.

Peak #5 - 2015-2016 - 177-147.

A skinny peak, one that started improbably in mid-2015 with the sudden ascendancy of Murphy, Cespedes, Harvey and others in the middle of that season, but ended in a painful World Series loss to the underdog Royals.  Update: Duda's errant throw home just sailed past Saturn and is expected to leave the solar system in 2 years.  

Then the Wilpons snuffed their team's chances of a longer peak run by allowing the mercurial Murphy to leave the Mets to join (of all teams) the arch-rival Bats.  

2016 was an unlikely Murphy-less surge to the playoffs spurred by the strong, late-season play of TJ Rivera, Seth Lugo and Robert Gsellman, after the latter 2 had been pounded all season in AAA.  A one game snuffing by a bum named Bumgarner over a brilliant Syndergaard, and the Mets' were out of the playoffs just...like...that, playing their last playoff game to date.

Trough #6 - 2017-21 - 336-372.

Despite two Cy Young winning seasons from Jacob deGrom, the Mets were 36 games below .500 over the past 5 seasons, as the malaise returned, despite a remarkable 2019 hitting season from the tandem  Alonso and McNeil.  


The Wilpons (boo!) never did enough to make this team a winner. Too strapped to bust the cap to do what was necessary?  Or just needed the bucks for a new arena.

This period included the first year of the Steve Cohen ownership period.  It (2021) was plagued with massive levels of injuries.  

The sense of many, though, is a new peak period is right around the corner, now that the organization is done with Wilpon incompetence and frugality.  Of course, that requires games to be played, because climbing a peak occurs one step at a time.


So, overall, 6 trough periods and 5 peak periods.  The trough periods totaled 35 years, while the peak periods totaled just 25 years.  

Just 5 World Series appearances - painful.  Had anyone told you there would be just 4 more World Series appearances, and just one more World Series win, in the 52 years after 1969, I think many of you would have decided to be fans of something else. 



The Braves will be tough adversaries, if and when 2022's season starts, but the time to right the S.S. Mets' Ship, and sail it to the next peak, is now.  

Right Now, in fact.

No half-stepping, no cutting corners.  Mets fans understand this game is a game of twists and turns, but to overcome those twists and turns, it helps greatly to strenuously avoid incompetence and frugality (I & F).  Competence and open checkbook are keys.

After all, Mets fans have seen where "I & F" have gotten the Mets, as they have spent well above a billion less in salary than the Yankees over the past 25 seasons.  The Wilpons kept cheaping out, relatively speaking, on managers, on GMs, on the farm system, and on the Mets' roster, and the results speak of themselves.

What is most relevant to Mets' fans is what has happened more recently.  Over the past 31 seasons, just 10 peak seasons and 21 trough seasons.  

Enough, quite frankly, is enough.  Not only is it time to live amongst the peaks, it's beyond time for the Mets to spend a sustained period of seasons residing on higher peaks than those found in the Bronx.

Enough is enough. 

We want peaks!  Nuttin' but peaks!

3/9/22

Tom Brennan - My First Games at Shea Were During a 43 Run Slugfest Doubleheader in 1964


RI-CO!  RI-CO!

I used to watch every single Mets game on WOR channel 9, unless the game was on when I was in school. I had nuns for teachers back then - you didn't cut class if you wanted to live - trust me.  Those Sisters of Mercy could hit harder than Al Weis, that much I can tell you.  The convent had some real clean-up hitters.  Anyway...

The first time I ever went to Shea Stadium, I was taken there by my uncle, "Big Tom" Brennan, after whom I was named.  He wasn't Uncle Tom, and he didn't own a cabin - no, he was Big Tom.  I was the growing, but still shrimpy, Tom version.

Not on that day, but my uncle (who lived in nearby Jackson Heights) used to bring a 6 pack of beer when he went to Mets games back then.   He was a huge Mets fan, and attended lots of games at Shea back when few people did.  No one hassled him about sneaking in the 6 packs.

Two months earlier, on May 26, 1964, the Mets trounced the Chicago Cubs in the Windy City 19-1, with 23 hits, before a sparse gathering of 2,503 fans, so there was almost a run scored per fan.  

I wondered if this game might be a franchise turning point, when the Mets would finally start to be good.  Nope.  Check back in 5 years, kid.

They did not score much in contests after that game, at least until the doubleheader my uncle and I went to.  It was a Braves doubleheader, on July 26, 1964.  It was a big crowd - nearly 32,000 fans.

The Mets actually scored a lot that day.

The Braves, though, scored a lot more.

The Mets lost both contests, 15-10 and 11-7.  I had a blast - I enjoyed every one of those 43 runs - even though we lost as usual - we ended the day, through Mets game # 100, at a painful 30-70 - but boy, did we score a lot that day!   17 runs!

Trust me, I was one happy offense-starved 10 year old.

Met Killer Rico Carty did what he did best, of course - HIT!  

He had 5 hits, 2 HRs, and 8 RBIs in the doubleheader.  With that 5th hit, the righty slugger was hitting .342 on the season.   He scared me when he went to the plate.  .342 hitting opposing players can do that to a kid.

The second game was really exciting, as the Mets trailed 7-3 after 6, then scored 7 in the 7th to take a 10-7 lead, but allowed the Braves to score 4 runs in each of the 8th and 9th innings to bury the Amazins. The Mets' Larry Elliot smacked a pinch 3 run homer in that very rare 7-run rallying 7th inning, but even the 20 hits they had in game 2 weren't always enough for the Mets to win a game in those days.  

Heck, Hall of Famer Warren Spahn threw the last 2 innings for a save, and had a hit too. Why did he relieve, you might ask?  Simple.

The Mets chased him to an early shower in game 1, and unlike today, when that starter would then get an obligatory 4 days of rest, Spahn got 4 hours rest and relieved in game 2.  Of course, he tried to steal a base, like any 40+ year old might, and got caught stealing, too, did that Mr. Warren Spahn, making the mistake of trying to run on the laser arm of catcher extraordinaire Jesse Gonder, who it must be noted hit over .300 in a part time role for the Mets that year.

Sure, the Braves had Hank Aaron, Joe Torre, and Eddie Matthews, three Hall of Famers who combined for 1,514 HRs and 4.935 RBIs (wow), and some other fine hitters, like Lee Maye, who cracked 44 doubles that season, and Denis Menke.  

But they also had Rico Carty. 

Rico, you see, was a Met Killer with the bat.  How so?

300 career at bats, 114 hits.  Do the math. 

That's .380. THREE EIGHT ZERO.

Including 21 doubles, 15 HRs, 67 RBIs, 44 walks, just 39 Ks.

In his MLB career, he was .299/.369/.464.

He hit over .300 seven times, including one season where he led the NL, hitting an awesome .366 with a .454 OBP. All that got him was 10th in MVP voting.  "No respect!", I could imagine myself hearing the great Rodney Dangerfield say.  (Rodney loved the Mets - check this video out): 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPYMvUsyOcQ.

No, Rico never got as much respect as he deserved, in my opinion.  For instance, as a rookie in 1964, he hit a superb .330/.388/.554 - and only came in 2nd in rookie of the year voting!  SMH. "Hey, he was only number TWO!  That stinks - like number 2!", I could almost hear Rodney complaining.

He was one of the guys in the line-up when future Hall of Famer Nolan Ryan debuted as a Met at age 19.  Ryan got Aaron out, Torre launched one off him, and Carty?  Ryan's first career walk, as I recall.  Eddie Matthews played, too, and the feared Felipe Alou also hit against Ryan in that game.  

Imagine Ryan facing that incredible slugging Braves team as a 19 year old making his Mets debut.  Wow.  Imagine if you told those Braves that day that Nolan would still be pitching 27 years later in 1993 and own baseball's all time strikeout record.  They would have thought you were nuts.

Anyway, I always feared the bat of one Rico Carty.  He wasn't a Hall of Famer.  He sadly didn't do enough in his 30s to pull that off.  

He was a Met Killer, though.  I saw it first-hand that day, on July 26, 1964.


P.S. I wrote in 2014 about that Ryan game - an excerpt follows:

His first batter was an easy one, the pitcher, Pat Jarvis. Punched him out!  Then .300+ hitting Felipe Alou flew out and Eddie Matthews (Hall of Fame Eddie Matthews, mind you) got caught looking, for a 3 up, 3 down, 2 K inning!!!
So they sent Nolan out for the 7th, too.  Another easy inning shaping up.  
Hank Aaron (yep, that Hank Aaron) steps in and grounded out, 1B to pitcher covering – guess he couldn’t get around on the heat.  Then 34 homer, .314 hitting Joe Torre stepped in, and made it homer # 35.  Welcome to the big leagues, Private Ryan.   Then another milestone, as he walked deadly slugger Rico Carty, his first of 1000’s of career walks surrendered.   
A guy with a familiar first name, Mack Jones, stepped in and lined out.  C’mon, Nolan, where are the K’s?  Denis Menke, thank you, struck out swinging to allow the gunslinger to do that cowboy strut back to the dugout.   A saunter he would replicate an awful lot for 27 major league seasons!
2 innings, a homer, a walk, and 3 K’s.  And I was more excited at the end of those two innings of pitching than anything else I'd ever seen as a kid Mets fan.  I’d seen a guy who threw harder than Koufax!!  On the Mets!!!
HAVE....A....GOOD....DAY!  
I HOPE IT'S #1....AND NOT #2.

3/7/22

Tom Brennan - TJS/UCL Literature

Any baseball fan knows that elbow injuries are a baseball epidemic.

BEFORE THE ARTICLE:

The NY Post reported the following:

After MLB and the MLBPA met for a bit over an hour and a half at MLBPA headquarters in midtown on Sunday — with the union making its first proposal since talks broke down in Jupiter, Fla. on Tuesday — MLB responded by saying the two sides were “deadlocked.”

Two thoughts: 

1) IDIOTS!  

2) Let me be Solomon - I'll split the baby for them.

Now, the article:

As Mets fans, we all know from our current and ex-Met players that needed Tommy John Surgery (TJS or UCL) in their careers: 

deGrom, Syndergaard, Matz, Harvey, Wheeler, Rivera, d'Arnaud, Ginn, Allan, Szapucki, and quite a few others over the years.  

Also, many a college prospect ends up needing TJS, impacting their draft status.  

So, I wondered, what does literature have to say about TJS?  

I dipped my toe in the large pool of articles, and briefly looked at summaries for 4 articles, published on an NIH website.

(one article's link is https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34377712/).

In conclusion, I am just throwing this topic out there for your consideration - in case it truly piques your interest - I found, rightly or wrongly, that at the moment, I am not feeling motivated to delve into the issue further at the moment. 

But you might be motivated, and the literature out there is plentiful if you are.  

I imagine every smart MLB team is extremely educated on the subject, because it has to make player decisions based on the best available data.


1) Outcomes in "revision Tommy John surgery" in MLB pitchers (2016 article published by the NIH) (revision TJS is defined as a 2nd Tommy John Surgery):

Background: With the recent rise in the number of TJS, a proportionate rise in revisions is expected. However, much is unknown regarding the current revision rate of TJS, return to play, and change in performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers.

Methods: Publicly available databases were used to obtain a list of all MLB pitchers who underwent primary and revision Tommy John surgery. Pitching performance preoperatively and postoperatively for pitchers who returned to 1 or more MLB games after revision surgery was compared with controls matched for age and position.

Results: Since 1999, 235 MLB pitchers have undergone TJS; 31 pitchers (13.2%) underwent revision surgery, and 37% underwent revision within 3 years of the index procedure. 26 revisions had more than 2 years of follow-up; 17 pitchers (65.4%) returned to pitch at least 1 major league game, whereas only 11 (42.3%) returned to pitch 10 or more games. 

Of those who returned to MLB competition, the average length of recovery was 20.76 months. Compared with controls matched for age and position, MLB pitchers undergoing revision surgery had a statistically shorter career after revision surgery (4.9 vs 2.6 seasons, P = .002), pitched fewer innings, and had fewer total pitches per season.

Conclusions: The rate of revision TJS is substantially higher than previously reported. For MLB pitchers, return to play after revision surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. The overall durability of MLB pitchers after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction decreases significantly compared with controls matched for age and matched controls.

2) Return-to-Play and Competitive Outcomes After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Among Baseball Players: A Systematic Review (Dec. 2020 Article in NIH):

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) is very common in baseball. However, no review has compared the return-to-play (RTP) and in-game performance statistics of pitchers after primary and revision UCLR as well as of position players after UCLR.

Purpose: To review, synthesize, and evaluate the published literature on outcomes after UCLR in baseball players to determine RTP and competitive outcomes among various populations of baseball players.

Methods: A literature search including studies between 1980 and November 4, 2019, was conducted for articles that included the following terms: ulnar collateral ligament, elbow, medial collateral ligament, Tommy John surgery, throwing athletes, baseball pitchers, biomechanics, and performance. To be included, studies must have evaluated baseball players at any level who underwent UCLR (primary or revision) and assessed RTP and/or competitive outcomes.

Results: A total of 29 studies with relatively high methodological quality met the inclusion criteria. After primary UCLR, MLB pitchers returned to play in 80% to 97% of cases in approximately 12 months; however, return to the same level of play (RTSP) was less frequent and took longer, with 67% to 87% of MLB pitchers returning in about 15 months. 

RTP rates for MLB pitchers after revision UCLR were slightly lower, ranging from 77% to 85%, while RTSP rates ranged from 55% to 78%. RTP rates for catchers (59%-80%) were generally lower than RTP rates for infielders (76%) and outfielders (89%). 

All studies found a decrease in pitching workloads after UCLR. Fastball usage may also decrease after UCLR. Changes in earned run average and walks plus hits per inning pitched were inconclusive.

Conclusion: Pitchers returned to play after UCLR in approximately 12 months and generally took longer to return to their same level of play. Pitchers also returned to play less frequently after revision UCLR. After both primary and revision UCLR, professional pitchers experienced decreased workloads and potentially decreased fastball usage as well. 

Catchers may RTP after UCLR less frequently than pitchers, infielders, and outfielders possibly because of the frequency of throwing in the position. These results will help guide clinical decision making and patient education when treating UCL tears in baseball players.

3) Short-Term Trends in Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Collegiate Baseball Players: An Analysis of 25,587 Player-Years (Jul 2021)

Background: Trends over time in the incidence of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgeries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I baseball players are currently unknown.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trends in UCL surgeries over 3 years in Division I baseball programs. We hypothesized that surgical injuries would be consistently high over the course of the study.

Methods: Athletic trainers from Division I baseball programs were invited to participate in an electronic survey over 3 seasons. A total of 155 baseball programs agreed to participate in 2017, 294 programs participated in 2018, and 296 programs participated in 2019. After each of the 3 collegiate baseball seasons, the athletic trainer from each program entered anonymous, detailed descriptive data and surgical information on injured players into a secured database.

Results: During the 3 years of this study, 100% of the enrolled programs successfully completed the survey (155/155 in year 1, 294/294 in year 2, and 296/296 in year 3). This registry of 745 completed surveys over 3 years represented 25,587 player-years from Division I collegiate baseball. 

The percentage of programs with at least 1 UCL surgery during this time was 57% in 2017, 51% in 2018, and 49% in 2019. The majority of these players were pitchers (84% overall from the 3 years). Seniors underwent a significantly lower percentage of the UCL surgeries (8% in 2017, 10% in 2018, and 13% in 2019) than did underclassmen. 

Surgeries were performed most often in-season and least often during the preseason. A slight majority of players undergoing surgery originated from warm-weather states, but the number of these players was never significantly higher than was the number of players from cold-weather states. 

Most surgeries performed each year were UCL reconstruction, but the percentage of UCL repair with ligament augmentation increased each year (10% UCL repairs in 2017, 20% in 2018, and 25% in 2019).

Conclusion: UCL injuries requiring surgery were found to be a major source of morbidity in Division I collegiate baseball, supporting our hypothesis. This study can serve as a baseline for tracking long-term trends in UCL surgeries in collegiate baseball.

4) Return to Play Following Nonoperative Treatment of Partial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Professional Baseball Players: A Critically Appraised Topic (2018)

Clinical Scenario: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries are highly prevalent in professional baseball players with the success of operative management being well known in the literature. Return to play (RTP) rates following nonoperative management of partial UCL injuries in professional baseball players are not well established in the literature. With a UCL tear being a potential career-ending injury, it is imperative that the best treatment option is provided to these throwing athletes. 

There is an increase in the incidence of UCL surgical rates and a lack of general agreement on nonoperative treatment of partial UCL injuries as reported by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons in 2017. There is also a lack of clarity on when to initiate rehabilitation, which may be due to the limited amount of studies reporting success of RTP rates and time to RTP following conservative interventions of partial UCL injuries. 

Evidence on the RTP rates seen following conservative management of partial UCL tears injuries can help guide health care providers in deciding on the best treatment option for professional baseball athletes who desire to return to their athletic careers. These rates of RTP will add valuable objective input when determining if conservative management is the best choice. To determine the current evidence, inclusion criteria for the literature search consisted of RTP rates following conservative treatment in professional baseball players between inception and 2018. 

Clinical Question: Is there evidence for successful RTP rates in professional baseball players following conservative treatment of a UCL injury? 

Summary of Key Findings: Three retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Of those, 2 reported RTP rates following a nonoperative rehabilitation program of a UCL injury, whereas 1 reported RTP rates after injection therapy in subjects who attempted a trial of conservative treatment. All 3 studies considered location and grade of UCL tear. 

Successful RTP rates (66%-100%) were reported in professional baseball players following nonoperative treatment of partial UCL injuries. 

Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence supports high success with RTP rates up to 100% after nonoperative treatment of grade 1 UCL injuries in professional baseball players and between 66% and 94% for a grade 2 and above. 

There is level C evidence for high RTP rates following nonoperative treatment of partial UCL injuries in professional baseball players.