Paul
Sewald - alas, Paul is not a fireballer, but what Paul is, is
"darned effective."
The
6'3" righty reliever was outstanding in his career all the way through AA
in 2015, with a career ERA below 2.00, more than a K per inning, and almost no
blown saved. If there was an
Effectiveness Rating, through 2015, Paul would have rated A+.
Then came
Vegas in 2016. Even in Vegas though, he
pitched really well, having a 3.29 ERA on a team which had a far, far higher
team ERA.
My guess is
if he had pitched in the pitching-friendly AAA International League instead,
his ERA would have been under 2.00 yet again.
Over the past several years, no Mets minors reliever has done as well as
Paul, to my recollection. Akeel Morris had his stretches, as did Dario Alvarez, before both were traded, but Paul's
stretch of reliever excellence lasted longer than either of those two.
Sewald was
not put on the 40 man roster, and then wasn't taken in the Rule 5 draft, so
there have to be some reservations as to his future success at the major league
level, but he is a non-roster invitee to the Mets' major league camp this
spring.
Turning 27
this spring, the former 10th round selection obviously needs to make a great
impression against big league hitters.
He always has excelled, why can't he do well this spring?
I'd
personally very much like to see Paul latch on at the big league level and have
a successful career. Maybe this year,
Mr. Sewald, maybe this year.
4 comments:
Sorry for the odd spacing, folks. Edit mode a little tricky on this one.
My guess is his limited success in Vegas, coupled with his age, kept him off the Rule 5 list.
I too hope he gets a shot.
Even at his age you'd think someone would want him. The numbers speak for themselves. That makes me wonder...
I agree, Reese. When he was left off 40 man, I was sure he'd get snatched. His ERA had to be one of the best for western AAA teams, so maybe there is less than meets the eye.
Post a Comment