2/25/26

RVH - Mets 2026 Season: A 93-Win “Thought Experiment”

 

As we settle into the first week of Spring Training, the air is thick with the usual optimism. But rather than just hoping for a “good year,” let’s treat 2026 as a thought experiment.

If we assume a successful season — specifically a 93-win campaign that likely clinches a premium Wildcard and possibly the NL East — what does the math actually require?

To answer that, we have to stop debating individual players in isolation and start examining how wins are actually distributed across a 162-game season.


Reverse-Engineering a 93-Win Season

Every MLB season breaks down into three broad “game type buckets”:

  • The Blowouts (~30% / 48–50 games):
    Games decided by five or more runs. These preserve bullpens, inflate run differential, and usually reflect talent gaps.

  • The Close Calls (~30% / 48–50 games):
    One-run games. Often framed as coin flips, but for elite teams, they are stress tests of pitching leverage and late-inning structure.

  • The Competitive Middle (~40% / 62–65 games):
    Games decided by two to four runs. This is the fulcrum of the season, where roster floor, defense, and execution quietly determine outcomes.

If the Mets are serious about winning 93 games, the path runs directly through these buckets.


1. Dominating the Blowout Bucket

The Goal: 32–35 wins

The Process:
To reach 93 wins, you must win the games you should win — and win them convincingly.

The additions of Bo Bichette, Luis Robert Jr., Jorge Polanco, Marcus Semien, and Freddy Peralta aren’t just about star power or name recognition. They’re about lineup length and redundancy. The intent is to turn games that hover on the edge of competitiveness into decisive outcomes before leverage ever becomes relevant.

In recent down years, the Mets hovered around 15–20 blowout wins. The 93-win model requires pushing that number toward the mid-30s, insulating the team against inevitable cold streaks elsewhere.

Blowouts don’t just pad the standings. They reduce stress on every other bucket.


2. Tilting the One-Run “Coin Flip” (Pitching-Led)

The Goal: 23–25 wins (.600 winning percentage)

The Process:
In 2025, the Mets played 66 one-run games and won just 31 of them (.470). A 93-win team cannot allow these games to be governed by hope.

This isn’t about “beating variance.” It’s about preventing variance from dictating the season — and that burden falls primarily on pitching.

The addition of Freddy Peralta gives the Mets a starter capable of carrying narrow leads deeper into games, reducing early bullpen exposure. More broadly, a healthier starting staff changes the shape of these contests. Fewer short starts mean fewer innings asked of the bullpen before leverage truly matters.

At the back end, the Mets have layered relief options rather than relying on a single choke point. Devin Williams anchors the ninth, while Luke Weaver, A.J. Minter, and Meyers form a deeper, more flexible bridge. No single arm has to be perfect; the structure absorbs off nights.

When the margin is one run, pitching depth and sequencing matter more than vibes.


3. Winning the Competitive Middle (The Season’s Fulcrum)

The Goal: 36–38 wins

The Process:
This is where seasons are quietly won and lost.

Blowouts flatter talent. One-run games test leverage. But the competitive middle reveals whether a roster has a floor.

Here, the gains come from accumulation rather than flash. Improved infield defense, more athletic outfield coverage, lineup balance from both sides, and fewer pitching breakdowns all combine to reduce self-inflicted damage. These are the games where a single extra baserunner or defensive lapse flips the outcome.

Historically, this is where Mets seasons have cracked — not loudly, but incrementally.

The 2026 roster is designed to leak less in these spots.


4. Sustaining the 162-Game Horizon

The Goal: Avoiding the second-half fade

The Process:
We’ve seen this movie before. In both 2021 and 2025, the Mets collapsed under the accumulated tax of earlier months. Wins borrowed in April and May came due in September.

A 93-win season requires a second-half winning percentage north of .540. That doesn’t come from “trying harder.” It comes from depth — across the lineup, the rotation, and the bullpen — so the roster doesn’t hollow out when the calendar turns.

Depth isn’t a luxury. It’s variance insurance.


The Takeaway

The 2026 Mets aren’t just hoping the stars align. Through the lens of the Mets Process, a 93-win season is a series of mathematical benchmarks tied to structural intent.

For the first time in the Cohen era, the roster appears designed to absorb the variance of a 162-game season rather than be broken by it.

When the season begins, we won’t just be watching for home runs or radar-gun readings. We’ll be watching the one-run games, the competitive middle, and the long horizon — the places where this model either proves durable or quietly fails.

That’s where the math will tell us the truth.

6 comments:

Tom Brennan said...

They mentioned on the broadcast yesterday that when the Mets trailed going into the ninth inning last year, they went 0–70. That can’t possibly happen again. With better clutch hitters, you would think they’d pick up at least five wins there. Clutch is key to 93.

TexasGusCC said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
TexasGusCC said...


These articles make me wish the season would hurry up and finish so we can break it down and analyze it again!! LOL, I need to be patient…

At some point, I recall hearing how one run games are a result of management, and I agree with that. While some feel a manager doesn’t matter, I feel that he is huge and last year’s .470 winning% of one run games is in line with Mendoza’s poor year. In 2024, I kept feeling and chirping on how Mendoza was getting away with alot of mistakes - such as pulling starters too early - and getting away with it. Well, in 2025, he didn’t get away with that, and in fact, most mistakes were punished by reality. I’m hoping in 2026 he turns into Bruce Bochy, capable of trusting his eyes, quick to enforce proper fundamentals and game thought, and worthy of filling out a lineup card by not keeping players in their spot no matter their performance or whether they just came off the IL.

Paul Articulates said...

Health is a major contributor to a late season fade (or lack thereof). The Mets depth and the competence of their training staff is going to go a long way towards avoiding the fade.

Tom Brennan said...

Gus, without studying this, BB Reference ranked Carlos Mendoza 21st as mgr:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2025-managers.shtml

RVH said...

His, I’m planning on tracking the team in real time this season & these types of cuts will be in the analysis. Weekly, monthly & season to date.