Remember when you were a kid playing the paper and dice
version of Strat-O-Matic baseball where you could pit your team against another
team and see whether or not your decisions were better than those of your
opponent? I wasn’t a Strat-O-Matic
player, but I had a game with a similar concept that allowed me to do pretty
much the same, but had available player cards for other teams from different
eras. It would allow you to see how the
1969 Mets might fare against the 1927 Yankees (not well!)
The games came to mind after looking at what’s going on in
Las Vegas with the AAA 51’s. Not only
did they have a night with back-to-back-to-back-to-back home runs, but they’ve
got nine hitters with batting averages of .290 or better (including the recently
promoted Wilmer Flores). Brandon Allen, Andrew Brown, Eric Campbell, Juan Centeno, Allan Dykstra, Zach Lutz, Anthony Seratelli and Taylor Teagarden are all helping to contribute to a league-best 25-10 record putting them already 7.5 games out front in first place. While the
starting pitching hasn’t been quite as dominant as had been hoped, recent good
outings by Noah Syndergaard, Rafael Montero and Jacob de Grom give strong hope
for the future as the pitchers adjust to the thin air of the PCL. The pen has had 4 credible arms – Vic Black,
Joel CarreƱo, Miguel Socolovich and Zach Thornton.
Then I took a look at the Mets lineup which featured Ruben
Tejada, Travis d’Arnaud, Chris Young and Curtis Granderson all struggling near
or below the Mendoza line. Their
pitching has also struggled a bit lately, including Bartolo Colon, Zack Wheeler
(until his last start) and Jenrry Mejia (despite a 1 run performance on Friday,
he was lifted before finishing the 5th inning). The bullpen before Friday night was in its
second slump of the season with few if any of the relief pitchers seemingly
able to pitch for another team.
So the question I pose is could the 2014 Las Vegas 51s
regularly beat the 2014 New York Mets?
Pitchers might improve getting out of the desert, but batters would
likely regress. How much they’d regress
is debatable when juxtaposed against the current Mets squad. While some of the offensive prowess could be
written off against the hitting environment in the PCL, the fact remains that
Wally Backman has this crew performing at a higher level than ever before.
That leads to a second question. How much of a player’s performance is
attributable to a player’s self-motivation and innate talent, while how much is
the result of coaching and mentoring?
Are the current Mets players simply not that good or are they not lead
by an effective manager? The truth is
probably a combination of both.
Sound off in the comments below.
2 comments:
Promote the entire Las Vegas squad, and Wally, and go for it! I think they'd do all right
Bill Price in the Daily News has a column about doing just that. Wally Backman obviously is an explosive personality --- something that would be a welcome change from the somnambulist in charge right now.
Detractors quickly pointed out that no one interviewed him when he was available for the taking, but that's also true of Zach Thornton, Daisuke Matsuzaka and others. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. However, changing the leadership would re-engage the fans and help repair a lot of damage done since the current regime was put in charge. Of course, the fact he's a 1986 hero makes a double marketing win.
Price concludes because it is the smart thing to do it will never happen. He's unfortunately right.
Post a Comment