Mets fans are by and large a loyal lot. Every time they lose a player they bemoan
that fact with tearful, “Oh, the humanity” type tirades and then welcome
reunions with open arms. However, there
are certain players who get on the wrong side of the fans, drawing their wrath
and ire to the point of no return. The
earliest one who comes to mind was Doug Sisk who, despite pitching to a career
3.10 ERA as a Met, was vilified and booed mercilessly.
Then came Bobby Bonilla, the player the fans loved to
hate. He was almost universally loathed
for taking the money and not delivering what was expected of him. He also produced an average of 32 HRs and 97
RBIs during his three years playing for the Mets in 1992 to 1994, but the fans
were ready with pitchforks and torches.
Mel Rojas and Armando Benitez earned their wrath by usually
pitching well, but blowing games when it counted most. Oliver Perez was universally despised for his
contract size and poor performance – a barely-above .500 record, a 4.58 ERA and
an unsightly 1.54 WHIP.
Next came the standard bearer for bad contracts, Jason
Bay. Now the fans never really seemed to
have it in for him on a personal level the way they did for some of the
others. He was dealing with concussion
after-effects and other maladies that contributed to his lackluster
performance. The fans’ wrath in this
case was more about the Wilpons who chose to go for him rather than Matt
Holliday when they had the choice.
And then came Jay Bruce.
Acquired in late 2016 for proclaimed 2nd baseman of the
future Dilson Herrera, the fans were already irritated with his arrival. Nevermind that he was leading the National
League in RBIs and already had 25 HRs under his belt.
His immediate output as a Met made people wish for the
offensive prowess of John Mayberry, Jr. or Rick Ankiel. Yes, it was that bad. In fact, it wasn’t until the final week of
the season when he turned in a .458 player-of-the-week type of output that the
heretofore locked doors to the fans’ collective hearts edged open perhaps
enough to deliver a piece of paper authorizing his 2017 option to kick in.
Still, it seems everywhere you turn there are articles
proclaiming that the Mets should decline his option or exercise simply to trade
him. While the former is flat out
foolish, the latter could be as well depending on what the return is. After all, getting merely the proverbial
bag-of-balls for a three-time All Star would add gasoline to the fire of the
fans’ hostility. Let’s see what this guy
is capable of doing.
On a 162 game average, Jay Bruce will deliver 31 HRs, 94
RBIs, a .248 batting average and 158 strikeouts. He’ll remind many of Lucas Duda as an
outfielder and is a tick better as a hitter.
He ought to be since he’ll be earning more than double what Duda is
paid.
Delve a little deeper and there are somewhat troubling
numbers. Remember, he became an All Star
with half of his games in arguably one of the best hitters’ parks in
baseball. There is a significant split
on power. In 2283 home ABs he hit 138
HRs but in slightly more away ABs – 2367 – he hit only 103 HRs. That’s a 25% reduction in home runs as a
result of being away from the cozy confines of The Great American Ballpark
where he’s spent his entire career.
Therefore, if you extrapolate his career numbers and factor
in a 25% reduction (perhaps more given Citifield’s reputation as a pitcher’s
park), he’s likely to deliver a .240/22/70 line playing a full season with half
his games in Queens. In today’s baseball
economics, that may be worth $13 million.
After all, that’s not far off from Curtis Granderson’s season which
actually cost more money.
Yesterday one of our loyal readers suggested that the Mets
actually try to trade away both Curtis Granderson and Jay Bruce. At first I thought the notion was too
drastic, but do you really think that Michael Conforto playing every day couldn’t
approach .240/22/70? I think he
can. I also think that if by some
miracle they retain Yoenis Cespedes, then the $27 million in salary savings for
those two lefty sluggers gone in trade can help provide other solutions. Put a Jay Bruce in another hitter’s park like
Colorado and he’ll flourish. Put him in
Queens for a year and, well, people would probably rather see Cousin Brucie out
in RF.
Sign him, but trade him.
I’m most definitely on board with that approach.
13 comments:
Good article.yes, sign and trade.
Also, wouldn't you take Bonilla #s in OF now?
Agree as well but I'm not holding my breath waiting for it to happen as we know how this club operates but the fact is if we retain Cespedes other big contract/contracts will have to go so this should be a very interesting off season. I also would sign either Jansen or Chapman because as we all know good pitching stops good hitting period and wouldn't we all love a killer bullpen to back what should be a killer rotation....how long till spring
I think if they sign Yo, they definitely need to trade either Bruce or Grandy. I don't quite think it's permanently "don't let door hit you" territory for Bruce. If they trade Grandy instead and keep Bruce, I could see him being slightly better on O than Grandy, but worse on D.
Trading both is a bit scary, seeing how Conforto struggled - but I'm not opposed. If they did trade both, I'd like to go hard after Andrew McCutchen for CF. Yo-McC-Conforto is an OF I'd like to see.
Yes, sign and trade Bruce and Granderson if you can find a taker. The Mets need to get younger and faster in the OF. They also need to open up spots for Conforto, Lagares and Nimmo. (this is all assuming Cespedes is back)
Sign another high end closer because Armando Familia is giving me the fits.
Trade both Bruce and Grandy. Then trade Lagares, Duda and a prospect for McCutchen. Yo-McC-Conforto.
Trade Bruce for a solid veteran C if possible. They can keep dArnaud for now, but can't count on him until he starts proving something.
I would actually be ok with a starting OF of Ces-Lagares-Conforto, with Nimmo in the wings. That's assuming we could get value back for both Bruce and Granderson. If we traded both, and the haul included a catcher, a serious bullpen piece and a couple of real prospects, I'd do it.
I'm working on a post about 'my' 2017 infield, which will be followed by one about my outfield.
I'll hold back my thoughts until then.
I am always for deploying your asset base in the best case scenario. both grnaderson and bruce will be free agents next year. so you can trade either. I assume bruce has more value so i would trade him. lower cost more traditional power approach.
I just want to get better and younger. as is almost always the case i like homegrown (or close) players vs mercenaries when im rooting and thinking about buying a jersey.
give me, ces, granderson/bruce, lagares and Conforto in 2017 and im good. give me ces, lagares, conforto, nimmo in 2018 and im probably good too.
actually just give me cespedes
the biggest thing this year will be how dom smith/rosario plays if they continue that step forward it gives the mets so much more flexibility going forward. as i assume both wright and duda will get injured at some point.
Tell Duda to keep BP to a minimum and maybe he'd have less back issues
Looking forward to it, Mack
Looking forward to it, Mack
Man everyone getting on board with the trade bruce and grandy Idea... You know that I have been...
But its all about Cespedes... He is a must...
Knowing if cespedes is in or out is the key to the off season...
Post a Comment