Mack was recently asked about the Mets shortstop inventory, mentioning that he would like to see 5 tools Ronny Mauricio move to the outfield and Amed Rosario and Andres Gimenez duke it out for SS.
I decided to look at them on an age comparable basis. Here goes:
 |
| PC - Ed Delany |
At age 20, Gimenez played the full year at Binghamton (AA) and hit as follows:
117 games, 432 ABs, .250/.309/.387, 22 D, 5 T, 9 HR, 24 BB, 102 K.
Not great numbers, but the 9 HRs impress me, as it is a clear indication that he is not the next devoid-of-power Bud Harrelson type.
 |
| PC - Ed Delany |
At age 20, Rosario split his season between A+ and AA, and hit as follows:
120 games, 479 ABs, .324/.374/.459, including 54 AA games at .341/.392/.481.
Surprisingly, he had fewer HRs (5) than Gimenez's 9, but Amed had 24 doubles and 13 triples.
So the clear hitting edge at age 20 goes to Amed Rosario.
At age 21, Amed had 393 at bats in Las Vegas, hitting .328/.367/.426 before his 46 game debut with the Mets, hitting .248 in 2017.
Amed might have been called up sooner in 2017, were it not for his defensive deficiencies and inability to draw a walk (still a real issue, with just 63 walks in 1,417 MLB plate appearances). Gimenez seems to have the walk deficiency but not the defensive deficiency.
Based on the foregoing Amed history, and his presence on the Mets after a surging 2nd half of 2019, by comparison Gimenez should be in AAA all year, and perhaps into 2021. Of note, however, is that Gimenez had a stronger 2019 second half and a fine Arizona Fall League stint, so maybe he can accelerate his big league arrival somewhat.
And maybe he is prime trade bait come July or the 2020 off season, if a log jam remains.
 |
| PC - Ed Delany |
Ronny Mauricio was .268/.307/.357 in Columbia at age 18 in 2019.
Rosario at age 18?
.274/.320/.372, but mostly in Brooklyn, so at a lower level. And keep in mind that Mauricio at age 18 was 5 months younger than Rosario in his age 18 year, and at that age, 5 months makes a difference.
Gimenez at age 18?
.265/.346/.349 at the same level. Keep in mind that Mauricio at age 18 was 7 months younger than Gimenez in his age 18 year, and at that age, 7 months is a lot.
Mauricio seems to have a leg up on the other two. It should be exciting to see what he does at St Lucie as he turns 19 in April.
One last comparison:
Ruben Tejada at age 20 played mostly in AAA where he hit .280/.329/.344, and then hit .213 in his Mets debut. At age 21, which is what Gimenez is entering, Tejada in 96 Mets games hit .284/.360/.335.
Observations:
I think Amed Rosario might be on his way to becoming the Mets' best overall SS other than Jose Reyes. I think 2020 will be his first WOW year.
Andres Gimenez has been highly ranked for 3 years in Mets' prospects' listings, but has not performed nearly as well as the oft-vilified Ruben Tejada at the same age. But a strong AFL in 2019 and a solid start this spring, including a game winning - yes, you guessed it - home run in Friday's game indicate a surge may be coming for the young man.
Gimenez has to enter 2020 with a chip on his shoulder. His edge on Tejada to this point is better defense and speed. Now, can his bat be as good, or better?
Ronny Mauricio may well have to switch to the outfield. Or another IF position (SS or 2B). But based on his age-related progression so far, we should all be very excited about him.
2020 could be a big season for the almost 19 year old, and it should be a delight to watch him advance. Rapidly would be most welcome.
If I had to rank the 4 guys, long term, I'd guess:
1) Mauricio
1a) Rosario
3) Tejada and Gimenez (tie right now)
What do you outstanding Mets' minds think?