Yesterday we took a crack at predicting the opening day roster given the in-camp battles, the health of various players and the concern to keep the payroll from escalating any further than it already has. Today let’s take a closer look at the starting pitching and how things both fair and unfair lead to decisions being made.
Everyone is fully aware of Sean Manaea’s alleged less severe right oblique strain which everyone has written in ink will require his season to begin on the 15-day IL. Right now rest and corresponding treatments are being done to attempt to minimize the length of his absence from leading the Mets pitching rotation.
Now the situation with fellow starter Frankie Montas is quite a bit worse. His evaluation of a high grade lat strain is met initially with an order to shutdown for up to eight weeks. The next phase afterwards would be the equivalent of having gone through a normal spring training ramp up to the season. Estimates vary but the most optimistic numbers which assume no setbacks nor recurrences have late May to mid-June as a timetable.
Everyone is aware there are four capable starters who can vie to fill in for these two starting pitchers. In alphabetical order you have Paul Blackburn, Griffin Canning, Max Kranick and Tylor Megill. None immediately jump out as being the equivalent of what they’re asked to replace but at the same time you’re looking at in Manaea’s case perhaps May 1st as a start date but then another 6 weeks or so later for Montas. In terms of starting pitching, 4 weeks is 5-6 stars and 10 weeks is 11-12 revolutions of the pitching rotation.
Paul Blackburn was a mid season scratch your head acquisition in 2024 after having played regularly for the Athletics. His baseball card numbers don’t fill you with a lot of confidence. Since debuting back in 2017 he’s functioned primarily as a starting pitcher.
Now some GMs are so obsessed with their ego and reputation that they will often extend a poorly performing player a longer-than-wise interval of appearing regularly. Last season some feared that outcome would happen with David Stearns’ former Brewers hurler Adrian Houser, but after seven mediocre starts he was cut loose. Some wonder if the same can be said about the less productive Blackburn whose only real attribute right now is apparently full health.
Griffin Canning is another pitcher that got people wondering what was the appeal? If you look over his numbers, Canning debuted in 2019 for the Angels and spent his entire career there until the Mets acquired him during the offseason.
Max Kranick has pitched for the Pirates before spending all of 2024 in the minors. His modest two partial years in Pittsburgh were ugly and his major league record is best not even cited. However, in a combination of St. Lucie, Binghamton and Syracuse he appeared in 45 games as both a starter and reliever, finishing with aggregate totals of 2-2 with a 3.82 ERA, a 1.288 WHIP and a 2.67 Strikeout-to-Walk ratio.
Then there’s many fans and writers’ whipping boy, Tylor Megill. He has had parts of the last few seasons with the Mets. He occasionally looked like a solid pitcher and future key player. Then there are other times he was simply a batting practice pitcher for opponents. He did finish 2024 strongly and thus far has shown higher velocity than the others.
If you’re a businessman, you want to see return on your investments. Tylor Megill was made a part of the Mets organization long before David Stearns was a part of it, but he’s also stood on the mound for manager Carlos Mendoza so there is familiarity there. He is also working on his last option, so it’s now-or-never time for him. I’m assuming he is one of the two starting pitchers chosen.
Based upon their career histories and Port St. Lucie spring performances you would think both Blackburn and Canning are the bottom two of this quartet of possible starting pitching replacements. However, major league experience (even at a mediocre level) often trumps common sense.
Max Kranick is the mystery man. He has pitched both as a starter and reliever in his career. If he is given the second starting slot alongside Tylor Megill, then he could shift to the pen when Sean Manaea is deemed ready to play. Neither Blackburn nor Canning offer that flexibility.
It would seem that hoping the younger two with some experience and higher potential are superior choices to the older two whose experience has not been good at all. Then again, I didn’t acquire either of the would-be also-rans so I have no ego in this race to color my decision.
7 comments:
Sometimes, out of mysteries, gems arise. Montas had a 4.84 ERA in 2024, so he was no guarantee to be better than Megill and Kranick - but he got the bucks, even though injury-prone. Sean Manaea’s combined ERA in 2022 and 2023 was 4.75, but he stepped up big last year.
I think we get some gem work out of Kranick and Megill this year. I think both will step up big. Blackburn and Canning? Good luck, Harry.
The difference between Blackburn’s and Kranick is a 2.
Blackburn’s spring WHIP 2.57, Kranick 0.57.
Blackburn has faced 26 guys, fanned just one. I know, just rounding into shape,
Seeing this in writing actually scares the crap out of me. I'm not a big McGil fan, but if anyone he deserves a chance. HIS FINAL CHANCE.
Tom, I hope your right about finding a gem in Kranick. I like what I see so far. Let's see what happens when he faces a real lineup. I'm rooting for him.
Unless Canning found Jesus this winter (The Lab). Then he can join Blackburn in the crap.
Got to say this rotation scares the crap out of me.
Tom, can you tell me what Montas has over Stearns to get a contract like that? This signing has the potential to be the worst in all of baseball.
Montas signing for one year would have been OK, with a team option. Two years is looking like a doozy. But think about Jake's huge contract with Texas, and all the time he's missed. THAT is a doozy that I am so glad we sidestepped.
I think Blackburn and Canning are swing pitchers who will get phased out when 1) guys get healthy, or 2) Sproat is ready. Sproat throws about 7 MPH more than Canning and Blackburn. Those two guys ain't great. Heck, one outing does not a career make, but that last Tidwell outing was highly encouraging.
Under Stearns I have more faith that dreck doesn't progress simply based upon experience. Maybe Blackburn and Canning get a start or two but 4+ runs (in reality or in projection) doesn't make anyone think they are solutions but rather continuation of the problem.
Post a Comment