10/13/21

Reese Kaplan -- An Embarrassing But Accurate Question to Ask


A question asked recently in the comments here on an article I wrote Monday regarding the hiring brick wall really resonated with me.  Reader Gary Seagren asked a profound question, "Why does it always seem that we never get 'our man' and will that ever end?"


Wow, that inquiry really hits the nail on the head.  It called to mind that period of irrelevancy when the Mets were mired in a string of unsuccessful seasons in which top talent steered clear of Shea Stadium for the manner in which the club operated and their seeming unwillingness to extend competitive contract terms that would be favorable to options from other ballclubs.

For a refresher course, it was during the off-season after the 2004 Mets campaign in which the club went an unimpressive 71-91, finishing 25 games back, only ahead of the then Montreal Expos.  The starting lineup included regulars like Jason Phillips, Kazuo Matsui and Richard Hidalgo.  Mike Piazza had been shifted to 1st base towards the tail end of his career and his power output was down to (for him) a meager 20 HRs.  

At that time the Mets made a concerted effort to return to relevancy and did so mostly by the free agent route.  Red Sox star pitcher Pedro Martinez received a four-year deal worth $53 million, but that was the stepping stone that eventually led to the prize of Carlos Beltran who inked a then-record 7-year contract for $119 million.  The end result of these moves was a jump to merely 7 games back at the season's end and a winning record of 83-79.  

This chapter of Mets trivia definitely came to mind when I thought about the bold moves necessary once again to get people not only to regard the Mets with interest, but also anticipation of possibly winning ballgames.  Right now they're in danger of reverting to the Dallas Green era when they were regularly the fodder for late night comedians' jokes about incompetency and the creative ways they found to lose.  

Obviously there are issues to address to make the club sit on the positive list of future employment for folks who earn their living from baseball.  The farm system is a mess.  The training facilities and treatments are obviously wholly inadequate.  The love affair with one dimensional ballplayers means the roster is saddled with an inability to field the ball, run bases nor execute Little League-worthy fundamentals.  

Granted, between a new POBO, a new GM, a new manager, new coaches and several new players, the team that takes Citifield for Steve Cohen in 2022 promises to be far different than the one that accelerated into the bottom echelon of the standings during his own rookie year as team owner.  They often say when things are at their worst there is no way to go but up.  Unfortunately, we've seen far worse from the Mets in the past.  The hope here is that the courage, the planning and the dollars invested will bring the right people to the organization and answer Gary Seagren's question positively. 

11 comments:

nickel7168 said...

"The farm system is a mess. The training facilities and treatments are obviously wholly inadequate. The love affair with one dimensional ballplayers means the roster is saddled with an inability to field the ball, run bases nor execute Little League-worthy fundamentals."

I don't agree with any of this.

Tom Brennan said...

Nickel and Reese, I largely agree with you on the farm system being a mess - they lost a lot.

But in what counts, which is producing talented future impact major leaguers, I think they get a much higher grade...I very much like our having Alvarez, Baty, Mauricio, Vientos, Ginn and Allan. And Lee and Cortes ain't bad. I'd like more quantity, but these several players ought to be successful.

That said, if I am a free agent hitter, and I can equally choose either a good hitters' park or the worst run-producing park in the majors, I am not coming to Queens. Why work in what is in effect a hostile work environment?

Mack Ade said...

You have to realize that most top suits who make good money in less taxed cities really don't want anything to do with New York, no less the mess.

TexasGusCC said...

Preach Mack, preach.

Beane supposedly is open to coming to the Mets. The Brewers got eliminated yesterday thanks to our buddy Freddie Freeman. Thanks Fred! Hoping the Giants kill off the Dodgers and this act can move to the next step.

nickel7168 said...

Get real people, the Mets are not alone...only one team wins it all...ONE.
There are 29 "also rans". Once again, the Mets are one of them, as are the
Rays, Skankees, Cards, Phils, Brewers, Padres, Angels & one of the Giants & Dodgers etc. I'm not going to name all the losers. Every one of those 29 teams
failed at one thing or another and need to improve at something and/or make
changes, either a major, minor, or complete rebuild.
The point is: does it really matter where the Mets landed among the 29 "also rans"?
You move forward and do what you have to do. The Mets were in 1st place for what?...105
straight days? They are not that far off. Without the gazillion injuries, we would have had a better gauge of the talent we have. Stop licking wounds and get to work.

Gary Seagren said...

I still remember when we got Keith and I wondered "what's wrong with him" and pretty much when we landed Mike also figuring why would he want to come here? The one that really sticks in my mind was when we got Beltran and again I said "What's wrong with him" and when everything checked out it looked like wow WE GOT HIM then I read the next day that he would have signed with the Evil Emire for less and it ruined the moment but big picture is about why they don't want to come has to change because I don't think even all of Stevie's money truly fixes that.

bill metsiac said...

I don't understand the point about the "obviously inadequate training facilities".
Can you elaborate, Reese?

Anonymous said...

On not getting their man.

It is NY. Some people from other parts of the country do not like all the hustle and bustle here. There are better places to play and to be management. This is somewhat close to what had happened (before this coming season) to the NY Knicks. No one wanted to come here to the Knicks to play, and some management type people passed on being with the Knicks organization as well.

It's a curse sort of thing.

But it is definitely changing now for the Knicks. They got "Tibby", Rose, and now Fournier too. With Randle and Barrett already here, this is beginning to look like a playoff contending team now. The first since the Ewing years really.

But for so long for the Knicks it was very, very difficult. Having a winning organization often paves the way. The NY Mets need to be just that in 2022. Then all this hesitation will end for people coming here, in my opinion.

Nothing attracts fans and people to an organization more than a winning record. Nothing.

Anonymous said...

True on your post Gary.

It's having a winning and respected organization that changes everything, not the money being floated about necessarily.

Is it a good organization and place to play or manage?

nickel7168 said...

What happened to "no place better to win than in NY"
People like Keith and Zeile say that all the time,
people have been saying that for years.

nickel7168 said...

"The Brewers got eliminated yesterday thanks to our buddy Freddie Freeman. Thanks Fred! Hoping the Giants kill off the Dodgers and this act can move to the next step."

I love Freddie Freeman too...to bad I hate the city of Atlanta.