So the Mets, on December 18 or thereabouts, as I write this, agreed to sign pitcher Griffin Canning. So I did what I like to do:
See what Steamers (Fangraphs) projects him to do in 2025, after his high innings and high 5.16 ERA with the Angelinos in 2024.
Well, the “steam team” had him pegged at 129 MLB innings for 2025 and a much better, and not-so-bad, 4.22 ERA.
So I looked to compare him to leaky Paul Blackburn.
Steamers projects Paul with a high 4.66 ERA, giving him an Adrian Houser feel, if you catch my drift.
Tylor Megill, you ask? A 3.77 ERA projected for 2025. Nothing shabby about that. So get off the big fella’s back.
How does that compare to ace Kodai Senga?
Darned close…at 3.79. That is “Ace Kodai” with a small a.
Dandy David Peterson (oft referred to as “my ace”)? A dandy 3.71 ERA.
Garrett Crochet, whom the Mets failed to trade for? 168 IP, 3.02 ERA.
- Just thought I would throw that in there.
Sean Manaea, who was up for grabs, and grabbed by the Metsies once more?
- Steamers sees regression, to a 4.01 ERA. Ugh. May they be WRONG.
I project Manaea at a better 3.50.
Compare Manaea to newly acquired Clay Holmes, who Steamers had down for 2025 at 144 innings, 3.52 ERA. Yeah!
Jose Butto? 3.86 ERA, 62 innings, but no starts, as per Steamers for 2025.
Back to Griffin Canning. His career stats reveal a few things:
Far better starter (results-wise) at home. Lousy road W-L record.
He had 7 VERY BAD starts in 2024, in which he allowed 47 runs in 33 IP.
In all his other starts, 139 innings, much better at just 58 total runs.
So, cut down the number of bad starts, to four, let’s say, and you have a much better pitcher.
He fanned a lot fewer batters per IP in 2024 than in 2023. Why? Dunno.
He allowed a high 31 HRs in 172 IP, so spacious Citi Field ought to help there.
So, I say:
Get Canning in Hefner’s gain-of-function pitch lab, and fix him real good.
So that he can Terminate more opposing sluggers.
ROSTER REFORMING…
Like the T2 Terminator machine in the Terminator 2 movie, the Mets roster had to melt down at the start of the post-season, and then re-form.
It is almost fully reformed. When it is, it will be extremely dangerous, and resilient.
Other teams will run screaming in fear.
Finally…
THERE ONCE WAS A GUY…
…who, in his ages 25-28 years for a non-Mets team hit .284, averaging 38 doubles, 7 triples, 25 HRs, 102 RBIs and 99 runs.
Very solid numbers. Fairly close to Juan Soto numbers.
This person, this “guy”, Bobby Bonilla, then became a NY Met.
Not terrible as a Met was the former Pirate, but disappointing to many.
Of course, Soto is a much better OBP guy than Bonilla was, has more HR power, and will start his Mets career 3 years younger than Bobby Bo started his Mets tenure.
Still, it reminds you that Soto will need to continue to perform at extremely high levels to justify that gargantuan contract. His past numbers don’t count, but his Mets numbers sure will.
So…
Help Soto out, Uncle Steve.
Move the fences in.
We want to see “WOW” stats from him.
And a few more cheap homers will help boost his stats to WOW status.
Lastly, a touching Christmas photo I saw on Facebook:
7 comments:
Does Steamers have eyes on The Invisible Man? What does it predict for him?
Bill, I will assume the Invisible Man you refer to is Pete Alonso, and he is projected at 37 HRs, 100 RBIs, .242 in 155 games.
If you have another Invisible Man in mind, let me know.
The interesting thing is STEAMERS changes its projections. A week ago, when I wrote this and Manaea hadn't re-upped with the Mets yet, it projected him to have a 4.17 ERA, but now coming back to spacious Citi Field, that quickly dropped to 4.01.
Have you ever done a post-mortem for last year's projections? Is Steamers any more accurate that you or I would be?
R69, I actually thought the same thing a few minutes ago. I will take a look at what I wrote on the subject then and see.
R69, here is the chart I pulled off from early Jan 2024. Lindor was too low, as was Vientos and (not surprisingly) Iglesias. Pretty close on Alonso, Alvarez and Marte. McNeil and Nimmo too high, and Narvaez was drastically too high. DJ Stewart and Trayce Thompson were fairly close to their miserable performances.
Francisco Lindor 672 .254 .333 .446 .336 12.4 0.4 0.3 4.3
Brandon Nimmo 630 .269 .364 .443 .352 20.1 -1.4 -3.8 3.8
Pete Alonso 672 .250 .340 .515 .359 25.4 -2.8 0.1 3.3
Francisco Alvarez 504 .232 .316 .459 .332 7.6 -1.2 4.6 3.2
Jeff McNeil 616 .289 .348 .418 .335 10.7 -2.0 -2.0 2.6
Brett Baty 448 .248 .320 .420 .321 2.7 -1.0 -1.8 1.7
Starling Marte 595 .263 .320 .404 .315 0.5 2.4 -5.1 1.2
Omar Narváez 307 .244 .322 .370 .306 -2.1 -1.0 0.8 1.1
Tyrone Taylor 406 .237 .291 .421 .306 -2.6 0.4 2.3 1.0
Mark Vientos 350 .244 .310 .449 .325 3.3 -1.0 -0.1 0.9
DJ Stewart 399 .221 .323 .417 .322 2.9 -0.8 -1.0 0.7
Joey Wendle 308 .245 .289 .362 .283 -7.8 -0.3 0.3 0.4
Ronny Mauricio 63 .255 .300 .417 .307 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2
Tyler Heineman 32 .226 .305 .326 .283 -0.8 -0.1 0.4 0.1
Zack Short 119 .197 .304 .328 .284 -3.0 -0.3 0.0 0.1
Trayce Thompson 35 .198 .296 .374 .294 -0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0
José Iglesias 28 .252 .292 .350 .281 -0.8 -0.1 0.0 0.0
Taylor Kohlwey 7 .226 .312 .333 .289 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cooper Hummel 48 .200 .308 .326 .286 -1.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.0
Total 6240 .251 .326 .429 .327 66.4 -9.0 -5.1 24.7
Never ass-ume! 😁
In this case, it's not Pete, who is constantly referenced in media and fan sites.
The guy who is virtually invisible, and very rarely even mentioned, is Q, whose ERA (both '24 and career) is better than Montas' best year.
Bill, Fangraphs has Q at a 4.36 ERA. My guess is Stearns wants more bang for his buck.
Post a Comment