Engineering Upside Potential (aka Positive Variance) Is a Skill
Yesterday, I presented two scenarios for the Mets 2026 season. After a busy trade week, most roster conversations collapse into a binary debate: Is this good enough or not? That question misses the point.
The more useful lens for this Mets roster is positive variance — not random luck, but upside that emerges when a roster is intentionally constructed to allow multiple things to go right at once.
Good organizations don’t eliminate variance. They design for asymmetry.
What Positive Variance Actually Means
Positive variance isn’t about miracles. It’s about clusters.
It shows up when:
Several players have plausible rebound paths, not long-shot ones
Those paths are independent, not correlated
And the roster doesn’t collapse if only some of them materialize
That’s exactly how this Mets roster is structured.
Where the Upside Lives
1. Rotation Reversion (Not Reinvention)
The Mets aren’t asking their starters to become something new.
They’re asking them to return to baseline health and sequencing.
Kodai Senga doesn’t need to reinvent his arsenal — he needs his lower half synced again.
Sean Manaea isn’t chasing velocity — he’s chasing efficiency and durability.
David Peterson doesn’t need growth — he needs better workload management.
These are lab-friendly problems. That matters.
If two of the three revert meaningfully, the entire staff stabilizes.
2. Position-Player Optionality
This roster doesn’t hinge on one breakout bat.
Mark Vientos doesn’t need a new swing — modest gains in pitch recognition alone change his value profile.
Luis Robert doesn’t have to play 155 games — he has to play enough.
Carson Benge isn’t being rushed — his value is timing, not headlines.
None of these bets require perfection. They require partial hits.
That’s intentional.
3. Depth as a Variance Multiplier
Depth isn’t about names. It’s about when options become available.
Because the Mets didn’t empty the system:
Injuries don’t force premature promotions
Slumps don’t trigger panic trades
July doesn’t become a bidding war out of desperation
Depth doesn’t raise the ceiling by itself — it protects upside when it appears.
The Quiet Advantage
The biggest mistake fans make is assuming upside requires risk concentration.
It doesn’t.
This roster spreads upside across:
Health reversion
Mechanical efficiency
Developmental timing
Trade flexibility
That’s how you end up with seasons where several things go right without needing everything to.
Why This Feels Different
Previous Mets teams chased certainty:
Big contracts
Fixed roles
Narrow paths to success
This team accepts uncertainty — and manages it.
That’s not lowering expectations.
That’s how you keep them alive.
Positive variance isn’t luck.
It’s a skill.
And this roster finally reflects that.
5 comments:
I honestly have no reservations about this season.
I am still targeted to 2027.
Well structured article. I would add my take on one point, and propose other.
Vientos needs to swing more at first pitch strikes, a lot more. And be satisfied once some of those swings resulting perhaps not the hardest hit out. Because he needs to avoid more than half of his plate appearances ending up at two strikes and hitting .133. His stats are already telling him to recognize that pitches in the strike zone on zero strikes are to be swung at and not taken. Because on two strikes, he hits like Jerry Koosman. And JERRY, God love him, was a sucky hitter for a pitcher.
I would add as a subset of the mechanics point that hopefully, the players are training well and properly to avoid stupid injuries like obliques that in days gone by he almost never heard of, but in today’s game, you hear a lot of. The strains last year of Manaea, Montas, and Minter destroyed 2025.
The team is positioned well. It will take some time for them to gel, but as some of the improvements you mentioned take hold, the momentum will build.
Mid season ads as starters will lead the way come the break
Thanks for a great explanation for guarded optimism!
Post a Comment