There has been a lot of chatter since the Mets' season ended about their lack of defensive prowess and how it may have cost them a few ballgames in 2019. Using the highly scientific "eye test", I would tend to agree that the team struggled to catch the baseball last year. If you take a look at the statistics, the Mets finished 19th out of 30 teams with a team fielding percentage of 0.983, along with 98 errors so that seems to line up with our collective impression.
In addition, the Mets also surrendered 49 unearned runs which are usually the end result of giving your opponent extra "outs" if you will. While no one is perfect, you want to minimize mistakes where you can since close games are usually won by teams who are better fundamentally, i.e. defensively. Just ask the Milwaukee Brewers who were in position to eliminate the Washington Nationals from the NL Wild Card game before an error late in that matchup doomed their chances.
There are a ton of defensive metrics that you can use to evaluate a team's performance. To keep things simple, I am going to use Fielding Percentage as a measure of defensive ability for the rest of this article. I know that it doesn't necessarily account for things like each player's range, but it does measure how well a team makes plays that they SHOULD make.
If you take a look at the top ten teams in Fielding Percentage (FP) for the 2019 season, it would look like this;
St Louis, Houston, Kansas City, Atlanta, Arizona, Boston, Oakland, San Francisco, Cleveland and Washington.
***Eight of the ten teams listed had winning records (bold) and six of them were in the playoffs, to include the eventual World Series Champions in Washington.
If we increase our sample size to include the last five seasons (2015-2019), 64% of the teams in the top ten for FP had winning records. The lists are littered with playoff teams and past champions like the 2018 Red Sox. So, it would seem that an important ingredient for winning teams is making plays in the field when you are given the chance. While it doesn't guarantee success, it is MUCH harder to win consistently if you have a poor defense.
Despite the Mets' improving offense, they are still a team that is built around their pitching staff with a focus on "run suppression". Pitching is intertwined with defensive ability as we all know, so if the team can improve their defense it should have a positive effect on their chances of winning more than 86 games in 2020.
I know, nothing written above is new information but it helps to explain how important a team's defense is to it's overall success. A handful of teams appear on these lists every year like the Cardinals, Astros, Nationals, Braves and Red Sox. It's no surprise that these teams are also playoff contention year in and year out (with two of them in our own division).
So, now that we have identified an area of weakness, how do the Mets go about fixing the problem?
Good defensive team are usually strong "up the middle" (C, 2B, SS and CF), so that would be a great place to start. Ramos (C), Cano (2B) and Rosario (SS) are pretty much locked into their respective positions for the 2020 season, so changes are unlikely in the short term. None of the players are likely to win a Gold Glove, but they have the ability to be capable defenders (which would be an improvement over 2019).
The biggest void, in my opinion, is in CF and it is the most likely path for defensive improvement moving forward. The free agent market for this position is pretty sparse, so help will need to come from internal options, or more likely the trade market.
What's your fix?
11 comments:
Good data to support your case - but - I wonder how many of these teams lacked the offense or pitching where getting into the playoffs was decided by the fact that they had great defense.
I have two words for the DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE crowd: PETE ALONSO
Can you imagine if a defensive purist GM had traded him to an AL team with a DH due to his defense?
Two big boosts to the Mets' defense is a defensive BACK UP righty CF (not sure who) and a defensive back up catcher.
With the 26 man roster, I would like to get a good offensive catcher, and it would be nice if he were also good defensively. If not, our 26th man could be Ali Sanchez.
For CF, I am not averse to bringing back Lagaraes on a LOW cost contract as a 5th OF behind Jeff, Michael, Brandon, and Yo (if he will be ready) or Dom (if Yo is not). Lots and lots of offense - with passable defense.
It is, after all, about scoring more than you surrender. I hope the 2020 Mets score a LOT MORE than they surrender.
Defense may arrive later this year in Gimeenez, who should be hitting the weight room AND shagging flies.
The definition of insanity -- trying the same thing again and again but expecting different results -- would make me pass on Juan Lagares at any cost. By the eye test and by defensive metrics he is not nearly what he once was. So if he's not hitting or running and the defense has tanked, why waste a roster spot? I'd sooner have guy who is stellar defensively to play in the late innings after the starting centerfielder had his last AB.
I'm not necessarily giving up on improving at catcher as well.
Last season we had tremendous hitting and great starting pitchers.
The inadequate defensive can not be saved in one season but the horrible pen can be.
(but don't forget... middle field defenve saves losses also)
True, Mack.
I have filed articles of impeachment against the 2019 bullpen for NO quid pro quo. They got paid, we got gypped.
Reese, I agree with you on Lagares - if they can get another CF at $2 million, do that (as long as his name is NOT BROXTON). But if no one is better, and Lagares could be had for $1 million as a 5th OF, I would hold my nose and do that.
I am concerned with Starling Marte if we have to give up a couple of strong future minors prospects - guys that will start in a year or 2. Unless Cespedes is toast - then we could really use a righty hitting OF. Dom Smith and David Peterson for Marte, anyone?
I don't see an aging Legares or Marte as enough of an upgrade over a Comforto-Nimmo 7-5 of 12 split to warrant dumping Dom.
ChiSox have the #1 MLB OF prospect (Roberts?), do you swap Conforto for him?
Please
No more 30+ year olders anymore.
SO MANY 30 year old + guys get hurt, terminating their careers, or see a drastic age-related slide in ability/performance.
1-2 years TOPS for them.
Outfielders who suddenly imploded - Ellis Valentine, Nate Colbert, even Ken Griffey Jr - Mo Vaughn as a Met vs. his performance a few seasons earleir with the Red Sox...etc.
It is a young man's game.
Why not let leagues below AA go considerably longer? Rookie leagues 100 games rather than 70 ish, A and AA ball another 15-20 games? Get YOUNG guys to the majors quicker. Alonso was fortunate in 2018 that he was durable AND got to play a full Arizona Fall schedule, got 159 games in, and was ready for 2019.
Most guys don't get to add a bunch of Arizona games like Pete did. The weather everywhere is fine until the end of September - why waste Sept for the minor league players?
The NBA has lots of 19, 20, 21 year olds and they do all right - that is a young man's game, too. They don't wait for guys to be 24-25 to call them up when many of them tail off at 29-30.
Hobie-won-kenobe, who would the Mets have to give up for Roberts in your view?
Conforto. Maybe some low level fodder if nec (Vientos?--not much more)
Homie, I can’t imagine that Pittsburgh wouldn’t do Conforto straight up for Marte, since Micheal is younger and (I believe) still paid less. Vientos seems like a prospect to give up in another trade, if necessary, but if traded at all, I would like to see if Vientos could have a big 2020 year to up his trade value.
Post a Comment