So, it used to be the roster was 25 players, expanding to 40 on September 1, which is tomorrow.
Unfair to hitters in recent decades...why? Well, in Seaver's day, there were 15 hitters and 10 pitchers, which changed to 13 hitters and 12 pitchers. Lots of talented hitters on the outside looking in because the teams kept fewer hitters on the 25 man.
Magnanimously, the mighty Lords of the MLB universe fairly recently extended the roster size to 26.
But the Lords giveth, the Lords taketh away, as Lords tend to do, so the old rule allowing rosters to expand up to 40? Well they cut that by TWELVE, from a max of 40 to 28.
A mere, stinking 2 player expansion come September 1. SMH.
I asked Rodney Dangerfield about it, just expanding by 2 players, and he said, "It's UNFAIR, I tell ya. No respect at all!"
Many guys who have gotten oh-so close to a major league call up for perhaps their one and only time? Well, nothing to tell the grandkids about their time in the majors - because the Lords disallowed it. They...never...made...it.
If it is the extra money to be paid out, which the Lords wanteth to keep, I have an idea for you...any September 1 call up who has never played in the majors before?
They get paid half the normal rate, and you up the number back up, to say 32 men. Still an awful lot more dough than they ever made in the minors.
You also work something out with the players, so that September call ups don't start a new guy's clock to free agency. So, if the Mets wanted to call up Francisco Alvarez, let's say, I'm sure he'd be thrilled, and would prefer that. Ronny Mauricio? Mark Vientos? Then, the following year, from March through August, the normal roster rules apply.
Great learning experience for them, too. Invaluable, in fact.
Family and friends, and fans, would see a more player-friendly group of Lords, whether they are Lords...of Flatbush... or somewhere else. You see, benevolent Lords are more appreciated than stingy ones.
Making it 32 instead of 28 would add 120 more guys to the 30 teams, many of whom would find it to be their only time in the bigs.
Billionaires wouldn't miss the money. Mere shekels. A mere bag o' shells, Jackie Gleason told me.
But heck, if they don't want to carry the extra cost, pay for it with something like a 25 cent surcharge on September tickets. I don't think fans would balk.
And, for the good of the goodwill of the game, more players would have more good stories to tell their friends and whoever might listen, about the game they so dearly love.
Whaddya think, folks?