12/27/25

RVH - Follow Up: Statcast Evidence Table — The Backbone Behind the Hitting Lab

 


Here is the data backbone behind the player-development takeaways in the Hitting Lab Snapshot I poted last week. Below is a compact Statcast Evidence Table showing the key metrics that support each hitter’s cause → effect → corrective lever → takeaway profile.

This is the appendix version — enough to support conclusions without overwhelming the feed.


Statcast Mapping Table (Cause → Effect → Corrective Focus)

Juan Soto - Preserve the machine

Key Metrics
• Swing% / Chase%

• Zone Discipline Variance (DV)
• xwOBA stability by pitch type

Why it matters
Soto’s discipline and attack-plane consistency are unmatched. His Statcast maps show virtually no persistent cold zones. Variance is minimal even when pitchers adjust.

Developmental note
This is not a “fix” profile. The risk is over-optimization. Any change must protect timing, posture, and recognition windows.


Francisco Lindor - Stabilize the attack angle

Key Metrics
• Launch-angle consistency
• Hard-hit% by zone
• High/low whiff distribution

Why it matters
Small attack-angle drift produces outsized slug volatility. When the plane stabilizes, impact returns. When it drifts, damage disappears quickly.

Developmental note
This is a fine-tuning problem, not decline. Plane consistency, not effort, is the lever.


Francisco Álvarez - Learn to sequence

Key Metrics
• Whiff% vs breaking balls
• EV / launch-angle variance
• Ground-ball rate vs velocity

Why it matters
Volatility shows up most against high velocity and low breaking pitches. The data aligns with inefficient kinetic sequencing rather than raw pitch recognition alone.

Developmental note
This is a movement education problem. Sequencing must be rebuilt before approach gains can stick.


Brett Baty - Find your rhythm

Key Metrics
• EV / LA volatility
• Whiff% vs fastballs
• Early/late timing tags

Why it matters
Contact quality rises and falls with timing stability. High-velocity struggles map directly to disrupted rhythm, not strength limitations.

Developmental note
Timing consistency is the swing. Mechanical over-adjustment risks making this worse.


Mark Vientos - Learn to see spin

Key Metrics
• Whiff% vs sliders
• xwOBA on fastballs vs spin
• Zone-based swing maps

Why it matters
The swing works. The bat speed is real. The statistical gap is breaking-ball recognition, especially late-tilt sliders.

Developmental note
Approach and visual recognition, not swing reconstruction, unlock the next tier.


Luisangel Acuña - Convert speed into impact

Key Metrics
• Average EV
• Pull-side air contact
• Chase rate on secondary pitches

Why it matters
Athleticism and bat-to-ball skills are evident, but impact lags. Speed is showing up in contact frequency, not damage.

Developmental note
Selective aggression and controlled lift are the bridge between tools and production.


Kyle Tucker - Refine the inner plane

Key Metrics
• xwOBA on inside pitches
• Launch angle vs velocity
• LHP timing splits

Why it matters
Performance dips are highly localized — inside-plane lift and specific left-handed sequences. The rest of the profile is elite and stable.

Developmental note
This is surgical refinement, not systemic risk.


Cody Bellinger - Control the whip

Key Metrics
• Attack-angle variance
• High/low whiff rates
• EV stability

Why it matters
Peaks and valleys align with bat-path volatility and posture drift. When the whip is controlled, production returns.

Developmental note
Posture and sequencing stability, not raw strength, drive outcomes.


Luis Robert Jr. - Stay inside the window

Key Metrics
• Chase% vs velocity
• EV consistency
• Zone miss concentration

Why it matters
Elite tools, but volatility appears when timing windows collapse. Misses cluster when commitment happens too early.

Developmental note
This is about decision timing, not athletic ceiling.


Austin Hays - Maintain posture through contact

Key Metrics
• LA drift by pitch height
• Pull-side hard-hit rate
• Contact point dispersion

Why it matters
When posture holds, damage follows. When posture leaks, contact quality drops fast.

Developmental note
This is a posture and balance maintenance problem, not approach confusion.


Ronny Mauricio - Synchronize power and recognition

Key Metrics
• Max EV vs whiff rate
• Zone aggression maps
• Breaking-ball chase

Why it matters
The power is real. The recognition window lags. When synced, the ceiling is obvious. When not, volatility dominates.

Developmental note
This profile benefits most from integrated biomechanics + visual training.


Jett Williams - Add real impact (power)

Key Metrics
• Max EV
• Average EV
• Hard-hit rate

Why it matters
Elite discipline is already present. Impact metrics show the next developmental gate clearly.

Developmental note
Force production without compromising approach is the challenge.


Carson Benge - Master the offspeed

Key Metrics
• Whiff% vs offspeed
• Chase rate vs spin
• xwOBA vs breaking balls

Why it matters
This is the classic tools-to-production bridge. Offspeed recognition separates future regulars from stalled prospects.

Developmental note
Recognition training is the unlock, not swing overhaul.


Closing Thought

Across these profiles, the pattern is consistent:

The next Mets gains won’t come from swinging harder. They’ll come from synchronizing movement, timing, and recognition.

That’s what the hitting lab is actually for — and Statcast is already telling us where to look.

14 comments:

Tom Brennan said...

Interesting. For Vientos, though, “Breaking-ball recognition is the clearest statistical gap in his profile.” I think his biggest area to improve if being far more aggressive on strikes in 0 and 1 strike counts…in the 53% of his at bats that reached 2 strikes, he hit .133 in 2025.

Reduce that 53% to 35% and see major results improvement.

Tom Brennan said...

Complex, but invaluable if they can implement.

RVH said...

At least now they have quantitative focus areas to develop specific skills. Still up to each player to translate into improvement & success - much easier said than done.

RVH said...

Agree Tom but Vientos (& many others) need to improve pitch recognition as well or the league will start throwing more breaking pitches earlier in the count & he will look like Siri last year - three & four pitch strikeouts. Soto’s key advantage is that he adjusts to the specific individual pitch so he will swing early if he recognizes a pitch to hit or he will wait & swing deeper into the count if he doesn’t get his pitch.

TexasGusCC said...

Thank you for including many players in the news, and my buddy whom no one likes. Great piece!

Tom Brennan said...

RVH, Mark Vientos’ pitch recognition problem may be unfixable. Why? He has been to the plate over 3,300 times as a pro. I think of Omar De Los Santos, minor league speedster. He could never improve in pitch recognition, and hence reached his plateau.

What Mark can definitely do is greatly increase his zero strike swing rate. He would have to wrap his brain around hitting only .250 on his incremental “strike zero” swings. But it is so much better than having 53% of your PAs end at 2 strikes, where you hit .133. The interesting thing is that if Mark starts to be much more aggressive on zero strike swings, pitches will try to get him to swing on that zero strike at sliders breaking out of the strike zone. Which means, if he can lay off those pitches, he will have a lot more 1-0 counts than 0-1 counts.

This more aggressive approach is what transformed Brent Rooker into a real-time power hitter from a floundering 26th man.

JoeP said...

Guys, I'm sorry if I come across as the Asshole in the room but I have a question for RV.

Are you a professional in these statistics? or is this just your personal opinion?

This is really a lot to take in before my morning coffee. I really appreciate all the work you do but for most of these data filled articles I have to wave the white flag.

Sorry, I really don't mean to be a schmuck. Just being honest.

Tom Brennan said...

Who s the Mets’ most tenured Met at this point? David Peterson, who debuted in 2020. Some hotels don’t change the bedding that fast.

Tom Brennan said...

RVH, I looked at the career first pitch swing rates for Luis Robert and for Mark Vientos. Robert? Almost 50%. Vientos? Around 28%. Blaring headlights there. Mark, are you out there, and do you see the headlights?

Paul Articulates said...

Some people just can't see spin. If that is Vientos' problem, trade him now. It won't get better.

RVH said...

Makes sense Tom. I hope he can do this - if he stays on th team.

RVH said...

Joe — fair question, no offense taken at all.

I’m not a professional scout or analyst. This is independent work using public Statcast data and a framework I enjoy building to explain why things might be happening, not to claim expertise.

And totally get it — some of these posts are a lot before coffee. Skim when useful, skip when not. I appreciate the honesty and the engagement either way.

RVH said...

Well done, Tom!

Tom Brennan said...

RVH, I would hate for Vientos to leave and suddenly solve the riddle elsewhere