12/24/24

Remember 1969: Pete vs. Vlad

 

Remember's Ramblings – Volume 1, Article 11

December 24, 2024

 


Pete vs. Vlad:  some interesting fodder for thought

News is a little slow these days other than a few miscellaneous first baseman that have been signed from the free agent list or traded from one team to another. 

Of late, Christian Walker, Paul Goldschmidt, Nathaniel Lowe, Josh Naylor and Carlos Santana have each found a new team.   

That brings us to one first baseman still on the free agent list and one that will be there in another year.  With each of the aforementioned signings or trades, another team has been eliminated as a possible team for Pete Alonso to sign with.  The contending team left with the biggest hole at first base is the New York Mets.   

It is certainly possible that Pete and the Mets will come around to discovering that they need each other and get it done.    It is hard at this point to see that he will command anything close to the reported 7 year $158M offer that he turned down a year or so ago.   A new contract ceiling looks like perhaps 5 years and $125M. 

There has been recent media and commenter rumblings on a possible projection of David Stearns wanting to do a stop-gap solution for 2025 at first base before going all-in for next year’s top gem – Vladimir Guerrero Jr.    

If anyone had the answer to the question of “What will Vlad command (and get) next year as a free agent?”, they could be rather rich.   Unfortunately, that answer is unknown, so some discussion and a wild guess are now in order.

First, the simple fact is that Vladimir Guerrero is a better player than Pete Alonso.   Second, Guerrero is more than four years younger than Alonso (or to level things, will be more than three years younger at the time of his free agency than Pete is now).  

Guerrero also does not have Scott Boras as an agent.   Who knows what difference that makes in either negotiating strategies or signing success.   

With Soto setting the bar with a $50M+ average salary, it is not unreasonable to assume that Vlad will command at least $40M per over a long term.   Let’s arbitrarily set his floor to be 12 years and $500M, although it is unclear if there are any teams that will have the need or the resources for that type of deal.           

So, a few questions:

-        Should the Mets tie up $140M per year on just 4 players?   (Lindor, Soto, Nimmo, Vlad)

-        Will Alonso’s and Guerrero’s stats for the next 5 years (and beyond) be that much different to justify spending $375M more, or $40+M per year for another 7 years after Guerrero is 32 years old?

-        If people are concerned with reduced production after age 30 for Alonso, can a $40M per year contract for Guerrero to take him to 39 be validated?

-        Are Guerrero’s previous comments about never wanting to play for the Yankees to be taken seriously?  If so, how much does that reduce his contract?

-        Is this really even an either/or question?  

-        Can Vientos fill the first base void long term?   And if so, who plays third and who is the DH? 

         

Remember’s Ramblings:    

My vote is to sign Pete for the next 5 years.   Do not sign Bregman now.  If another third baseman is wanted, trade for Arenado.   Vientos and Arenado share third and DH with Arenado being the tutor.   At the end of 2025, Arenado’s contract will be paid down sufficiently to trade him again and sign Vlad if that is the right thing to do.   Pete then becomes the full time DH for the next 4 years. 

 Personally, I’d love to have Guerrero as a Met for the next 5 years, but I can’t see both Soto and Guerrero aging well in the field through their 30’s and only one of them can be the DH at a time.    

  

Remember’s Reminiscing:   December 24 Birthdays

 

Frank Taveras, Matt Ginter, and Miguel Castro are all celebrating birthdays today!   Happy Birthday to all of them.

 

Lastly, Rickey Henderson would have celebrated his 66th birthday tomorrow.    His passing hit me hard this past weekend.  Rickey and I were born the same year – he was just a bit younger than I.    Way too young to leave this world.   From a baseball perspective, I used to love to watch Henderson play – he played the game the way I love to see it played.   While everyone has opinions and people have tried to normalize stats and careers across generations with calculations like WAR, Rickey in my mind was in the top ten (if not top five) list of all-time best baseball players.   What a shame that we have lost 3 of the great ones (and several others) in 2024 alone.   RIP Rickey.     

14 comments:

Tom Brennan said...

I am not worried how Vlad and Soto will age. I want championships, so my wish is they will get Vlad for 2026. Pete in 2025? At the right price and years. We do have Joey Meneses. He and Jesse Winker can man first base, if it means getting Vlad (or not) in 2026.

Steve said...

The need to fill the corner infield positions should be a priority. I am concerned about the trends that Alonso is developing over the last two years. Strikeouts trending up, OPS trending down.
If I were to sign him I would look to Bellinger's contract with the Cubs as a guide. Short-term with opt outs with higher AAV.

Trading for Arenado is a thought. Thinking may be a better thought than signing Alonso or Bregman. Would trade for him as my primary third base man with Vientos sliding to first. I would not like to be shuffling Vientos all over the field. "You are the primary xxx baseman. Go get it". Looked at Arenado's contract. A little confusing with the deferrals and monies being paid by Colorado. Get him for the base salaries for the next three years would not be bad.

If not extended by Toronto, The market for Guerrero should be robust. Those who lost out on Soto look to have a need for first base next year. Would not be surprised if he were to get Soto/Othani type monies. Feel the Mets interest in him will truly depend how Stearns views the development of the prospects including Clifford and Baez. (Next year's discussion).

Happy Holidays Everyone

Tom Brennan said...

Same to you, Steve, and isn’t it interesting how Mauricio is not being mentioned. He may turn out to be below average to average. To win, you need lots of “above average.” And, as Mack wrote the other day, defense really matters, and Mauricio still needs to prove he can escape his error-prone ways.

Steve said...

I still have an eye on Mauricio. Question is how he bounces back from the injury. After a missed year in 2024, the position player prospects needed to prove themselves. And the pitching prospects need to continue to move forward.

I agree, baseball is a team game. Rather have a lineup with mostly above average players than one or two superstars. Imagine a lineup with a player listed on MLB Networks Top 10.

JoeP said...

Guys you really have to forget about Vlad. Any team that gives this guy 10+ years should really have their heads examined.

Once this guy hits his 30's he's going to look like Daniel Vogelback. He's 26 and already fat. Just think how much he can eat with 500m guaranteed. Everyone is freaking out the Pete is already declining...at least he's in shape. Also, while in 2024 he had a monster year, the prior 2 were only ok.

Happy Holidays to all.

TexasGusCC said...

Good morning all! Im in lockstep with JoeP. Pete is in great shape and stays that way. Vlad is pudgy already. Also, WAR by years:
2.1, 0.6, 6.7, 2.0, 4.0, 6.2 = Vlad 21.2
5.5, 0.2, 4.1, 4.4, 3.2, 2.6 = Alonso 19.8

Yes, Vlad is younger but in poor athletic shape. He will probably hit forever and may lose 50 pounds this winter to really get after it. But, I’m glad I don’t have Stearns’ job. At this point, I’d go short term with Pete for about four years.

José Hunter said...

Don't be so mean to the exceptionally well-fed

Besides, I don't think Vogey was the worst thing since... a truckload of bread

And let's not forget how much we all loved Big Sexy

Along with being a very darn good hitter, VG Jr is interesting in one sense with his Dominican heritage and Canadian citizenry. He was born in Montreal as his daddy played for the Expos at the time

José Hunter said...

Hello, Gus

TexasGusCC said...

Greetings José.

JoeP said...

Hi Jose, welcome.

I wasn't trying to be mean because I'm a chubster myself, so I speak from experience. It's just too big of a risk.

Nice stats Gus...my point exactly.

Paul Articulates said...

I am also with JoeP. There are many reasons that a Vlad deal could backfire. There will be so much competition for him based on his stats that the price will exceed the value. And then if he rapidly declines because he's not taking care of that body it will be a disappointment. Pete has become boxed in by the many short term 1B signings and will have to settle for a shorter contract, which makes it affordable for the Mets, even at a $20-$25M AAV.

Remember1969 said...

i agree with the majority here.

I also am of the opinion that giving Pete a 5 year deal will not backfire. Don't give him the opt-out. I just feel like playing for that contract and all the questions through 2024 and the trade deadline played with his mind more than he admitted. Give him the money and let him play without the contract pressure and he will deliver.

Remember1969 said...

It is starting to look like my 02/28/204 article might have had some merit ==> https://macksmets.blogspot.com/2024/02/remember1969-pete-alonso-conundrum.html

Tom Brennan said...

I think Pete wants to get paid the sun, moon, and stars, but Manaea on the other hand was so thrilled to come back to the Mets, he signed for 3 years and not 4, and deferred some of the money. Let’s see Pete not be greedy here. Be Sean Manaea II. Remember, 30% - 40% of any extra contractual pay may be taxed away, anyway, so settle for less and make it up with World Series wins and endorsement $$.