By Brian Joura September 7, 2020
At the time of the deal to acquire Robinson Cano and Edwin Diaz, popular results among Mets fans was mixed. Maybe it tilted more towards those who thought it was a bad idea but certainly no worse than a 55-45 type of split. Then, after just about everything that possibly could go wrong from a Mets perspective happened during the 2019 season, popular opinion was heavily against the trade. It doesn’t feel like an exaggeration to say that on January 1, 2020 that 98% of fans would have voided the deal if given the chance.
So, it should be noted that both Cano and Diaz are performing quite well in this shortened season. Cano sits with a .958 OPS after 115 PA. And Diaz, after giving up runs in two of his first three appearances and losing his closer’s job, has battled back to post a 1.23 ERA in his last 14 games, with a 4.0 K/BB rate, thanks to 32 Ks in 14.2 IP. The walks are a concern but he’s only allowed 1 HR in that span, a far cry from last year’s gopher ball issues.
Meanwhile, Justin Dunn is 3-1 with the Mariners but has hardly been overwhelming with a 4.09 ERA, good for a 103 ERA+. Absolutely, the Mets could have used him in 2020 but he hasn’t been as good as either Cano or Diaz. And with no minor league season, we haven’t had any Jarred Kelenic exploits, either. Kelenic made the Mariners’ 60-man roster but he’s yet to make an appearance in the majors, despite Mallex Smith’s .348 OPS.
In 2019, the trade was a big win for the Mariners. In 2020, it’s shaping up to be a big win for the Mets. It’s the type of deal that the Mets were supposed to win in the immediate term. The hope was that the Mets would win the first 2-3 years while Kelenic was in the minors. And not just win from a production standpoint but win as in have Cano and Diaz lead them deep into the playoffs. That could happen in 2020, with the Mets now having a 53.8% chance of making the playoffs despite a current sub-.500 record. With a top-heavy pitching staff and a strong offense, they could win a playoff series or two.
It’s important to recognize how the deal is working for the Mets here in 2020. But let me state for the record that this was still a bad trade.
SPINNING THROUGH THE METS ROTATION – At the beginning of Spring Training, the Mets expected
their 2020 rotation to feature Jacob
deGrom, Noah
Syndergaard, Marcus
Stroman, Rick
Porcello and a battle between Steven
Matz and Michael
Wacha for the fifth spot. Of course, neither Syndergaard nor Stroman threw
a single pitch for the club. And Matz, Porcello and Wacha have been varying
degrees of terrible. The injuries are bad luck and the rotten performance –
well, it happens. But let’s recount how the Mets reacted to openings in their
rotation.
2 comments:
Nice article. I disagree on the Gsellman front. How many times can you defend or make excuses for what is clearly not a major league pitcher? Gsellman hasn't been productive for years now.
One comment on Justin Dunn. His seven starts include six against the ALs worst two teams, the Angels and the Rangers. His one start against a top lineup was against the Dodgers, and he was chased after two, surrendering six earned runs. He faced Trout 14 times, surrendering three walks and four hits. I don't see him being anything but a back of the rotation starter,
Post a Comment