We selected Pete Crow-Armstrong 19th overall in 2020, and he certainly exhibited promise in spring training as a future elite defensive CF with great speed. Let's hope he meets, and even better, exceeds expectations as a star major leaguer, once he heals up.
Let me also say that Mack has done a Herculean job on combing through this year's prospects and sharing his thoughts for months on what the potential draftees have to offer and where they might slot in during this draft, no easy task.
A big thanks to him for all those efforts.
I wrote the following historical piece last year, as we approached the 2020 draft. Thought it might be fun to post it up again for y'all.
As we close in on this year's draft, it got me thinking about Mets' drafts of yore.
If the Mets, or any team for that matter, draft well, and dynasties can result - draft poorly, your franchise will sputter and stall a lot and/or you will spend tons on free agents.
Any baseball guru will tell you that the MLB draft is something of a crap shoot, even in the first round, where one would surmise that most franchise stars come from.
The higher a guy is drafted in the first round, the more the guy should be a future star.
#1 overall, most times your pick should become a future star or even a superstar. To a large degree, that applies to #2 thru #5, too.
Picks 6 through 10 should vary from becoming a decent everyday player (or pitching starter) up to a star.
Picks 11 through 20 get iffier, but most of them should at least have modest big league careers, and many should be better.
Picks 21-30 are less likely to be impact players than the first 20 picks than pick #11 - #20. But many of the 21-30 crowd ought to do reasonably well in the majors. Heck, that was the grouping where the Angels nabbed Mike Trout.
At least that is how I see it.
Draft well, and dynasties can result - draft poorly, your franchise will sputter and stall a lot and/or you will spend tons on free agents.
So I decided, using the above round groupings' rules of thumb, to see how the Mets have done overall with their first round picks.
I listed them all in descending pick order, ranked by overall earliest picks first - my comments collectively tell me the Mets have done a truly poor job overall with first round picks.
You check it out, and see if you agree.
Yr | Name | Pos | Overall Pick # | Tom Comment |
1966 | Steve Chilcott | C | 1 | Shoulda took Reggie Jackson - BUST! |
1968 | Tim Foli | SS | 1 | .251/.283/.309 in 6,047 career ABs - not #1 overall caliber |
1980 | Darryl Strawberry | OF | 1 | Obvious, great pick - almost picked Billy Beane (did later) |
1984 | Shawn Abner | OF | 1 | .227 hitter in 809 at bats, none with the Mets - BUST! |
1994 | Paul Wilson | RHP | 1 | Looked promising, hurt his arm, 40-58, 4.86 ERA career |
1965 | Les Rohr | LHP | 2 | Look promising, got hurt, just 24 MLB innings - BUST! |
1979 | Tim Leary | RHP | 2 | 78-105, 4.36 ERA; 1 very good year, 17-11, 2.91 for LA |
1978 | Hubie Brooks | SS | 3 | Obviously a very good pick |
2004 | Philip Humber | RHP | 3 | See Paul Wilson, he looked good until he hurt his arm. |
1967 | Jon Matlack | LHP | 4 | Great pick |
1969 | Randy Sterling | RHP | 4 | He did get 9 major league innings in BUST! |
1981 | Terry Blocker | OF | 4 | 244 ABs, .205 - BUST! |
1983 | Eddie Williams | 3B | 4 | 1145 ABs, .252/.319/.398; none with Mets; # 4, BUST! |
1982 | Dwight Gooden | RHP | 5 | BINGO! Superb pick. |
1975 | Butch Benton | C | 6 | 99 career at bats, .162. Sweet pick. BUST! |
1997 | Geoff Goetz | LHP | 6 | Never made the majors - BUST! |
2018 | Jared Kelenic | OF | 6 | Soon to be great, perhaps, but not as a Met |
2010 | Matt Harvey | RHP | 7 | Great pick, eventually kneecapped by injuries |
1993 | Kirk Presley | RHP | 8 | Never made the majors, another gem of a pick - BUST! |
1992 | Preston Wilson | SS-OF | 9 | Very good pick - some great years |
2005 | Michael Pelfrey | RHP | 9 | Not very good most of career, 68-103, 4.68 ERA - BUST! |
2014 | Michael Conforto | OF | 10 | Great pick - MC Hammer |
2013 | Dominic Smith | 1B | 11 | May still turn out to be a great pick |
2003 | Lastings Milledge | OF | 12 | Excuses aside, a mediocre pick - BUST! |
2012 | Gavin Cecchini | SS | 12 | Terrible pick - BUST! |
2019 | Brett Baty | OF | 12 | We'll soon find out how good he will be |
1972 | Richard Bengston | C | 13 | Well, he briefly made it to AA, so you tell me - BUST! |
1976 | Tom Thurberg | OF-RH | 13 | He stunk in AAA, briefly, that was his high point - BUST! |
1996 | Robert Stratton | OF | 13 | Minor leagues .243 hitter - BUST! |
2011 | Brandon Nimmo | RF | 13 | Looked shaky until it looked very good! |
1971 | Rich Puig | 2B | 14 | 5'10', 165 IF had 10 MLB at bats, but alas, no hits - BUST! |
1973 | Lee Mazzilli | OF | 14 | Very good pick |
2002 | Scott Kazmir | LHP | 15 | Very good pick, foolishly discarded by the Mets |
1977 | Wally Backman | SS | 16 | Wal-ly, Wal-ly! Very good pick |
2000 | Billy Traber | LHP | 16 | 12 wins, 5.65 ERA in the majors: BUST! |
1974 | Cliff Speck | RHP | 17 | 2-1 in 28 career innings - for Atlanta - BUST! |
1990 | Jeromy Burnitz | OF | 17 | Excellent pick for a 17th overall |
1991 | Alfred Shirley | OF | 18 | .213 minor league hitter - BUST! |
1992 | Christopher Roberts | OF-LH | 18 | Peaked at 7-21, 5.52 ERA in AAA - BUST! |
1995 | Ryan Jaroncyk | SS | 18 | Was awful in A Ball - BUST! |
2001 | Aaron Heilman | RHP | 18 | Great pick |
2008 | Ike Davis | 1B | 18 | Very solid pick |
2016 | Justin Dunn | RHP | 19 | Looking like a very solid pick - Seattle thinks so, anyway |
1983 | Stan Jefferson | OF | 20 | 832 major league at bats, .216. BUST! |
1985 | Gregg Jefferies | SS | 20 | Awesome pick, mishandled by cocky Mets teammates |
1994 | Terrence Long | 1B | 20 | 3,068 at bats, .269. Solid pick for a # 20 overall. |
2017 | David Peterson | LHP | 20 | Time will tell. |
1986 | Lee May | OF | 21 | Daddy hit great, but this Lee May was awful. BUST! |
1988 | Dave Proctor | RHP | 21 | Proctor was a bad gamble, barely made it to AA. BUST! |
1998 | Jason Tyner | CF | 21 | Speedster was a powerless utility player for several years. |
2008 | Reese Havens | SS | 22 | Injuries robbed his chances of making the big leagues. |
1970 | *-George Ambrow | SS | 23 | Apparently never played - BUST! |
1980 | Billy Beane | OF | 23 | Billy Bust: 301 MLB at bats, .219/.243/.296 - BUST! |
1980 | John Gibbons | C | 24 | .220 in just 50 MLB at bats - BUST! |
1987 | Chris Donnels | 3B | 24 | 798 at bats, .233/.319/.355 - BUST! |
1989 | Alan Zinter | C | 24 | 78 major league at bats, .167 - BUST! |
2016 | Anthony Kay | LHP | 31 | Looking promising - for the Toronto Blue Jays. |
I list half (29) of the Mets' 57 top picks as BUSTS!
HALF!
Insanely bad, if you ask me, especially with 19 BUST picks in the first 9 overall picks over the years, which is pretty darned inexcusable. Unless you’re Dolly Parton.
Also, there were a few I did not list as busts that I could have - for instance, a # 1 overall pick should do better than Tim Foli did, or a # 2 like Tim Leary did - you could argue that they were BUST! picks, too.
Add to the BUST! picks the several other quality picks that shorted out due to injury, like Reese Havens, because they all count in the end, and the historical draft results are even worse.
I gave them a D+ for their entire first round draft history.
Just curious - can you think of any teams that have drafted worse over the years?
For sure, there have been a few great picks, and a decent number of picks who did solidly, relative to where they were picked in the first round.
Let me close by noting that in my opinion, top round drafting seems much better in recent years, which is a relief.
10 comments:
Brutally bad and just hope our new management is putting ALOT of time and effort into this as I agree it's so important as well as international signing. It has to be better than previous ownership's. Great win in game one and brings up another subject: how bad is Lindor? Peraza has 17 rbi in 129 AB's and important ones. FL has 29 in 338 AB's which is dreadful and I can only think of a few games where he's come up big offensively and all this for 341 mil. ugh.
I wonder how this stacks up against the other teams.
Too much work.
Gary, drafts in past times could be for all the wrong reasons, stated and unstated. Maybe for instance they didn't draft Reggie Jackson because he was black and Chilcott was white - I dunno.
But they really need a strong draft to rebuild the pipeline - I don't care if Mets minor league teams overall win or lose, as much as having guys that they can promote that will make the Queens club a long term success.
I have a piece on Saturday on Peraza. He has been big when it counts.
Think Perazza is next out the door when JD returns.
Ray, since Peraza can play the outfield too, and is a righty bat, I think he stays. He is clutch and has 6 homers and 17 RBIs more than Luis G, who has zero and one. He actually is tied for 6th on the team in HRs.
Wait, Pelfrey and Preston Wilson almost have the same career WAR, and one is a bust and one is a very good pick? Please explain
Mack, to do other teams would be a ton of work, but my brother says this: how many super offensive players have played in baseball since the 1960s. A huge number. How many have the Mets turned out? Very few. So, if you focus on offense players in drafts in # 1 spots, I can only imagine they'd be in the bottom third.
Pitching? They've done better.
Tom M. Donald wasn't going to spend a dime if he didn't have to and as far as the Jackson/Chilcott thing I always remember Seaver's quote when asked about Grant "he was the plantation owner" which pretty much sums it up.
Peraza has to stay.
Gary, draft the best talent, period. Grant's type of GM stuff belongs buried in Grant's tomb.
Post a Comment