7/31/21

Mike's Mets - Some Quick Thoughts on the Baez Trade


 

By Mike Steffanos

Ken Rosenthal is reporting on Twitter that the New York Mets have made a deal with the Chicago Cubs for SS Javier Báez and RH starter Trevor Williams. We're still waiting to hear about who the Mets are giving up. Also on Twitter, Bob Nightengale is reporting that the Mets are sending the Cubs our #5 ranked prospect Pete Crow-Armstrong. Crow-Armstrong made a big impression in camp this year but injured his shoulder only 6 games into the season with Low-A St. Lucie. The injury required shoulder surgery and put the 19-year-old out for the season.

We're still waiting for full confirmation on this trade, including if the Mets gave up more than Pete Crow-Armstrong in the deal. It stings a little to lose PCA, even if he is quite some distance away from the majors. But when you look at the prices paid for some of these deadline deals this year, it's not unreasonable.

There's no doubt that Báez's power and affinity for driving in runs will help the club. As with any deadline deal, so much hinges on whether he gets hot over the last couple of months. But the disappointing series just concluded against the Braves brought up continuing questions about the Mets' season-long inability to sustain their offense. Frankly, the Mets were lucky to win the 2 games they did in that series, with a grand total of 3 runs scored in those 2 wins.

The Mets were 35-25 in mid-June, 10 games over .500. Since then, they've gone 19-22. It was beginning to be fairly obvious that their hold on the NL East was precarious, particularly since the Phillies were actively trying to improve their club.

I fervently believe that the club has to be really disciplined over the next several years as they look to build the sort of deep farm system that has allowed teams like the Dodgers and Padres to stock their own team and swing some big deals. I don't like trading a prospect like Pete Crow-Armstrong for a rental. But, realistically, I don't think the Mets wanted to send their fans and their players the sort of negative signal that not making a move or only making low-impact moves would have sent.

So, while I don't love the move, I understand it. After more than 50 years of being a baseball fan and a Mets fan, I've learned that it's silly to believe that you're going to be 100% in favor of every move your team makes. What I hope for, now that the Wilpon era is over, is that even the moves that I don't love make logical sense. The Mets aren't just getting a very productive offensive player and a good defender in Báez. They're also getting some starting pitching depth in Williams. He's not great, but he'll give them a better chance to win than running out Jerad Eickhoff again. Nothing against Eickhoff, who was trying his best to rekindle his MLB career, but it wasn't happening with him.

This trade is reportedly pending physicals. I guess it's at least possible that the Cubs look at Crow-Armstrong's shoulder and decide to pass. Still, that seems unlikely, given that the Cubs surely did some homework before agreeing to a deal. Luis Guillorme and Jonathan Villar have done an excellent job holding the fort while Francisco Lindor's oblique heals, but Báez is a big upgrade at SS both offensively and defensively. The Mets will have a crowded infield when Lindor returns, but having too many good options is vastly preferable to not enough. That will sort itself out.

As to whether the Mets should try to sign Javy Báez long-term, that's trickier. Báez has a lifetime .303 OBP. That's a big negative, even with the power, speed, and defense. Even worse, in 2020 and 2021, his OBP dropped to .271 over 596 PA. He's struck out 206 times and walked only 22 times over that stretch. When Báez is hitting well, that can be overlooked, but when he goes through a rough stretch, that's going to be hard to watch.

To finish reading this article, please click here.

3 comments:

Gary Seagren said...

The big plus is he and Lindor are tight which hopefully will be a positive going forward but we NEEDED PITCHING. It all comes down to whether Jake is right or not AND will we ever again hit with runners in scoring positions oh and can we make it through the Giants and Dodgers and not be in 3rd place. Time of course will tell.

Tom Brennan said...

The amets in that stretch, Mike, are 6-1 in Megill starts, 13-21 in non-Megill starts. That is scary. I love Megill but can I expect him to win 6 of every 7 games started. No.

Mike Steffanos said...

Gary, I agree with you on both points: they need Jake to come back in September, pitch well and stay healthy, and they need to start cashing in some runs more consistently. Last night's loss was a perfect example.

Tom, that's an amazing stat. Hopefully having better pitchers starting games will help. Still, they've had a good number of well-pitched games that they blew because they couldn't score. If they don't turn that around, the last two months of the season are going to suck, plain and simple