The whole interview dance card appears to be filled and they are now going through the motions of an equally accessible and important job function as the new manager of the Mets.
Yeah, right.
This whole process was always just stage setting for plans XYZ if plan A didn't accept the position. Everyone knows the job was Buck Showalter's to lose and he would have to have gone all "Wally Backman on an umpire" during the interview for his candidacy to fall aside. The only issues are how much money he wants, how many years he wants and what time to schedule the first press conference.
Now while it seems I'm being harsh here, please don't misunderstand. After the less-than-spectacular luck the Mets have had with Mickey Callaway, Carlos Beltran and Luis Rojas it became clear to everyone that they were going to pick someone with a deep managerial pedigree. The only variable in play was which one to choose.
Just because someone has managed for a long time doesn't necessarily mean that they are good at that role. Take Terry Collins for example. He had been out of baseball for a dozen years before the Mets decided in true Wilponian fashion that promoting someone who was already on the payroll and who had once long ago had experience seemed like a good idea. Needless to say, it wasn't.
This time around the Mets were somewhat constrained by the contractual obligations many current managers had with their current employers, so it became more prudent to consider the folks who were not under any such constraint.
At no point did the Mets consider terminated Cardinals manager Mike Shildt who was sent packing over so-called philosophical differences with the senior management. The fact he had three full seasons under his belt with one first place finish, two second place finishes and an NL Manager of the Year Award on his shelf to go along with a highly impressive 252 and 199 record would seem to suggest the man knows what he's doing.
While we await the formal announcement of Showalter's new source of paycheck, the next round of speculation will be on who the man will hire for his coaching staff. Everyone was pushed out the door except Jeremy Hefner, so Showalter and his peers will have to move quickly to put together a team of personnel who they feel can help move the Mets in the right direction towards the first division.
Until the lockout ends, there's no player movement that can take place, so manager and coaches are what we have to debate over the adult beverages with fellow fans.
Showalter is a very reasonable choice that no one in baseball will dispute. The soundness of the reaction probably is the primary reason this decision was made.
9 comments:
Showalter vs. Shildt. You get two extra syllables with the former, so he’s my choice.
Either will be better than our last 10 years of managers.
The Mets right now are in the midst of a conversion from old school "show them the curve" scouting to analytics.
For now, the last thing they need is another Yes Man like last year's manager.
Let Buck have this team for now.
Well said Mack. The Buck stops the yes here.
Reese. It would have made sense to at least interview Schildt. Oh well
Choose Schildt as the bench coach.
Buck looks like the choice, but let's not overstate his "winning record". His overall w/l % is .505.
By comparison, your favorite Terry is a .495. I don't judge mgrs by w/l, but for those who do that's hardly a differential.
Thank you for confirming with numbers that anyone with eyes could tell -- Terry Collins is a loser. :)
I'm not a statistician, but I don't see a .10 difference as significant. If it is, what does that say about Gil Hodges'.463?
Believe it or not, there are some who say Hodges was a very good mgr. I'm one of them.
I always say you can't tell much by the manager's W-L record.
Example: Stengel was a Yankee beast manager in the 1950s. With the Mets, he probably had the lowest W-L% of any manager in history. Same guy.
I think I saw that one Buck managerial year, with the Orioles, he went 47-115. Drop that single year out and his .505 overall has to go to .550.
Al Jackson was 8-20 with the Mets one year, and 9-4 with the Cardinals a few years later. The talent makes so much difference.
I've been going back & forth on that with Reese since Terry was still our mgr.
You can't make chicken soup out of chicken 💩.
Post a Comment