While you can’t help but wax poetic on the energy,
enthusiasm and emotion Terry Collins brings to the Mets, you also have to
consider some of his ponderous decision making that has at times cost the team
games. The most recent clear example was
the Monday night Phillies game in which the Mets trailed by a single run going
into the 9th inning. Granted,
he’d used a number of his relievers already in that game – Ramon Ramirez, Bobby
Parnell and Jon Rauch. It was a crucial
time in the game and he still had in his pen Tim Byrdak, Jack Egbert, Frank
Francisco and Manny Acosta.
While I could perhaps understand the theory that you don’t
want to put an untested rookie type like Egbert into a must-win type of
situation with the game on the line, consider the alternatives. You could have gone with your closer who has
been on something of a roll lately, since without a lead he wasn’t likely to
pitch anyway. You could have gone to the
nightly dose of Byrdak. However, the one
man in the Mets bullpen who, under no circumstances, should have been entrusted
with a lead was the batting practice hurler Manny Acosta.
So what did the genius Terry Collins do? Of course, he went for proven mediocrity over
untested potential. We all knew what
would happen. We didn’t know who would
have the most fun with Acosta’s pitching but it turned out to be former Met Ty
Wigginton whose shot mercifully (and finally) ended Acosta’s Mets career.
If this incident was isolated then I wouldn’t have much of a
beef with Collins, but it’s a pattern I’ve seen since his tenure began. Has he played some rookies? Sure – but usually only when his hand was
forced (such as Andres Torres doing his Wally Pipp impression after the first
game of the season). However, the
Nieuwenhuis circumstance notwithstanding, why did he insist on playing slugger
Ronny Cedeño over Jordanny Valdespin?
What was the purpose of even having Valdespin on the roster on a few
separate occasions when he was given a sum total of 20 ABs in 15 games in the
majors. What does that mean – he started
twice? It’s hard to get into any kind of
hitting groove when you’re getting splinters in your butt. On the flip side, he had no issue with
putting Vinny Rottino right into action.
This same enigmatic decision making took place in the off
season when contracts were tendered to both Mike Pelfrey and Andres Torres (not
to mention the $1.2 million squandered on Ronny Cedeño). Between the three of them the team with no
money spent nearly $9.6 million for what?
Pelfrey is a career 4.36 ERA pitcher.
Torres is a career .241 hitter. Cedeño
slugs a robust .245. Again the team
embraced proven mediocrity instead of looking at potential for something
more. Would it have hurt to give the
defensive replacement role to career minor leaguers like Quintanilla or
Wimberly? Would it have hurt to have
rolled the dice on Nieuwenhuis to start the season in CF? Does anyone think Hefner (or even Schwinden)
given a full season’s worth of time in the rotation would be significantly
worse than Pelfrey?
Hindsight is always 20-20, but would you rather have had Roy
Oswalt and his $8 million salary in the rotation in addition to a couple of
minimum wage guys like Quintanilla and Nieuwenhuis AND SAVED $600K over what
they chose to do instead? No one knows
whether or not the front office explored possibilities beyond giving Pelfrey a significant raise based on his 2011 season that resulted in a 4.74 ERA.
Obviously Nieuwenhuis has far exceeded expectations. No one expects Quintanilla to have three hits
per night either. There is even room for
optimism considering the Mets are currently winning with nothing from Davis,
Duda, Thole, Tejada, Bay and (this week anyway) Wright and Murphy, too. Santana and Dickey are demonstrating they are
as good as anyone’s 1-2 punch in the league.
Niese has been maddeningly inconsistent with his 4.55 ERA and Dillon Gee
had better not sign any long term leases with the way Wheeler has been pitching
and the return to health of both Young and Mejia. It’s a fun team to watch, and perhaps they’ll
even (as Jim Bouton put it in Ball Four)
finish a few games ahead of their manager.
No comments:
Post a Comment