The rumors surrounding Colorado’s interest in trading for David Wright just won’t go away. There were rumblings during the waiver period that the Rockies wanted him and now the reports are strong that they’re going after him this offseason.
Colorado wants a RH hitter to add to Tulowitzki and Gonzalez and has a hole at 3B. Bringing in a power-hitting 3B like Wright fills both of these needs and allows them to drop Helton down in the lineup. Also, if CitiField has hurt David’s confidence and numbers, a move to Denver should resurrect him as a power threat.
All debating as to whether or not the Mets should trade Wright to Colorado aside, the question is what should they be looking for in return if he is traded. In trading Wright, the Mets’ top priority should be pitching…frontline, TOR starting pitching. It’s the most valuable commodity in baseball. Since Wright is the Mets’ most valuable trading chip, it makes sense that they seek pitching in return. Because of this, Drew Pomeranz should be the top target from Colorado.
Pomeranz is one of the top pitching prospects in all of baseball and came in at #14 overall in Baseball America’s Midseason list. The big lefty profiles as a future #1/#2 starter and would be a valuable addition to the core of young pitching that the Mets already have in-house. The 2013 (and beyond) rotation could feature Pomeranz, Harvey, Niese, and Wheeler in the 2-5 slots. Their combined salary of about $4 million will go a long way to easing the team’s payroll concerns and provide them with a stable of young pitchers on par with Tampa Bay. The difference being that the Mets would have the means to both lockdown these pitchers long-term AND go out and add an established star.
The next player to target is 3B prospect Nolan Arenado. Including him in this deal is a no-brainer for both sides. With Wright moving the Denver, Arenado won’t have a spot to play there and the Mets do not have a 3B prospect in their organization who projects as a major league regular. Arenado is another BA top 50 prospect and one of the best 3B prospects in all of baseball. He already has an advanced eye at the plate and has shown tremendous power - he hit 20 HR and drove in over 120 runs last year in A+ while striking out only 53 times. While there were concerns about his defense going into 2011, Arenado has been working very diligently at the hot corner this year and has impressed observers with his glove work. He’ll likely start 2012 in AA, however I expect that he’ll move quickly and will be ready to take over at 3B in the majors by Opening Day 2013. While he won’t be able to “replace” David Wright in a lot of ways, Arenado promises to be a very good hitter and an average defender. A homegrown (under team control and cheap) infield of Davis, Havens, Tejada (assuming Reyes leaves), and Arenado would provide the Mets with very good offensive production and solid defense, allowing the team to spend money in the outfield to round out a very good club.
The last piece I would go after is lefty reliever Rex Brothers. Brothers profiles as a potential closer, featuring a mid-90’s fastball and a mid-80’s “wipeout” slider. In the majors last year, he notched 59 K’s over 40 innings and sported a 2.88 ERA pitching out of the bullpen. With the Rockies looking to move Huston Street, it appears that Rafael Betancourt is the pick to follow him the closer’s spot. This doesn’t mean that Brothers is a throwaway, but it does mean that the Rockies would be more likely to deal him as he is not the closer-in-waiting.
That would leave the deal as David Wright for Drew Pomeranz, Nolan Arenado, and Rex Brothers. I mentioned earlier in the post that Colorado is also looking to move Huston Street. As it stands, the Mets have a need at closer. I don’t think that Street should be one of the targets if Wright is traded; Wright should be moved for young, high-ceiling talent and a closer like Joe Nathan can be signed off the free agent market to hold down the closer spot next year. However, I could see the deal expanded to include Street, in a way combining 2 potential deals. I don’t know what the Rockies would be looking for in return, I’m just going to assume they expect prospects (not the level of Pomeranz and Arenado) in return. The expanded blockbuster would look like
Mets: Pomeranz, Arenado, Brothers, Street
Rockies: Wright, prospects (Valdespin? Lagares? Nieuwenhuis? Flores?)
For a team looking for a closer next year, adding Huston Street (at $7 million) makes sense. He has averaged 30 saves/162 games in his career. Although his numbers took a dip last year, pitching in Colorado had a lot to do with that – his home/road splits are striking (ERA - 5.59 vs. 2.15). His acquisition still leaves room for the Mets to go and sign Joe Nathan in a setup/back-up role and further solidify the bullpen and give Jenrry Mejia, Brad Holt, and the “newly acquired” Rex Brothers time to mature before moving up to the ML pen. Going forward, I envision these three forming a very solid lockdown pen with one of them serving as the closer. There is another bonus to bringing in Street to close. He will be eligible for free agency after the 2012 season. This means potentially 2 more (possibly 4 if RA Dickey pitches well again next year and then leaves) early draft picks for a FO that covets them. The Mets might also be able to get him on the cheap, since they’re already at the table for Wright and the free agent market for closers is pretty strong this year.
The return for Wright (Pomeranz, Arenado, Brothers) might seem like a lot, however I think the market says otherwise. If 2 months of an aging Carlos Beltran (and no draft pick compensation) can net 1 Top 50 prospect from a team that desperately wants him, the price for 1 year of an in-his-prime David Wright (and 2 potential draft picks) should be higher, especially if the destination team in question desperately wants him. It’s not out of the question for the Mets to request 2 Top 50 prospects and a reliever for the face of their franchise and one of the best 3B in all of baseball. While it’s true that Wright can void his 2013 option if traded, there is no guarantee that he does so. Even if he wants to keep his options open, the Rockies will have moved themselves into prime position to retain Wright if they choose. After playing a season in Colorado (and likely watching his numbers jump), Wright could be swayed into staying.
If the Rockies are unwilling to include Pomeranz, the Mets should politely decline any deal. In trading Wright, the Mets MUST get a top-flight pitching prospect in return or the deal will be a disaster. Getting back Arenado and a lesser pitching prospect will turn sour very quickly and the trade will be remembered along with the Seaver and Kazmir trades. Since the Rockies are pursuing Wright and the Mets have the advantage here, they have to exploit it as much as they can or walk away completely.
11 comments:
Brothers was a very interesting choice.
I actually agree with this 100% (and I love David Wright). I have said since July that if Colorado wants Wright then the Mets should ask for Pomeranz, Arenado, and Brothers or Rosario (preferably Brothers). Otherwise you happily say no and keep the face of your franchise. You would get 2 big time prospects (imagine a possible rotation in 2013 with Wheeler, Pomeranz, and Harvey) and you could slide Murphy over to 3rd base. Also like the addition of Street to the deal. I think the odds of this deal happening is way less than 50%, but it's an interesting idea to consider.
I only take issue with the prospects you list for Street. Spending money on a closer when the only + hitter on the team is Davis is not good. Spending prospects is worse.
I like Street, but closers are for teams that are in the playoff hunt.
Thanks for the feedback guys.
As far as what to include for Street, I'm really not familiar with what the Rox would want in return and was just spitballing. If the Mets can grab him on the cheap, it would be great. If it's premium talent they want, I'd rather they just signed Joe Nathan. I agree that the team shouldn't go after a closer, I'm just taking Alderson's comments that "it's a need they'll address" into consideration.
I like the idea of Murphy playing 3B next year. That way he can build his value at a position he's comfortable with. If Arenado is the goods, he takes over in 2013 and Murphy becomes prime trade bait.
Nick, I hear ya.
Give us what we want or pound sand. We'll gladly keep him.
This Mets team isnt close to winning a game of ping pong, let alone a playoff game...if he has to go, i'd be relieved if Alderson gets another potential TOR starter like he did with Wheeler. Phlavy is right. A 7 million dollar closer makes zero sense on this team without Reyes AND Wright. Furthermore,...if David is sent packing, i'd assume Reyes is gone aswell. In that situation, you might aswell trade Murphy to an AL team who can get a great hitting, cheap DH for the next five years. Once that first domino falls, why bother saving the rest from falling. Let them fall, and start a new game with new pieces.
That's one heck of an article, really good points u make and i think u right that this is the best deal.
I would make that trade ONLY if the Mets lose Reyes as well. If Reyes returns, you have to keep Wright.
If Reyes leaves then obviously the playoffs are at least 3 years away so by the time Wright will see his next postseason game he will be around 32.
I don't like the idea of giving up one of those guys for Street though. I do wonder though if the Rockies would have any interest in Pelfrey as a bottom of the rotation/high upside guy.
I'm wondering how realistic it is to expect Colorado to trade Pomeranz. When they traded Ubaldo it was only because they were looking for a big pitching prospect they could build around. So to turn around and deal that big prospect for a one year rental when they are far from contention seems unwise on their part.
I'm not really on board with the idea of dealing Wright yet (it's still emotional and I'm not ready to give up on Reyes and Wright winning here) but a deal like this would definitely make me consider it in a hurry. That's a ton of high upside talent, the sort of deal that this organization just cannot ignore. The thought of a rotation of Harvey, Wheeler, Pomeranz, Niese and one of Mejia/Familia/Dickey would be incredibly tempting and Arenado and Brothers would be excellent pieces too.
Not sure if this is the way Sandy will take things but I totally agree with the premise. David Wright's your best trade chip. The Rockies are supposedly desperate for a third baseman. Rake them over the coals for everything they got and if they don't want to do it, no big deal...you don't have to make a deal if it's not beneficial to the future of the team.
Justin:
I don't think the chances of trading Drew are good, but we are talking David Wright and the team does need another bat to slip in their 3-4-5-6...
let's put it this way...
The chances are about as slim as the Mets trading Scott Kasmir.
Post a Comment