12/10/18

Reese Kaplan -- Is BVW's Big Mouth a Pro or a Con?



With the Seattle blockbuster trade Brodie Van Wagenen sent a signal in fireworks that his style and Sandy Alderson’s styles couldn’t be further apart.  The no-risk/no-reward approach of flipping hot young prospects and taking on some salary beyond the terms of the players headed cross country is indeed an execution of courage or foolhardiness, your actual results may vary. 

However, let me offer a rare observation in praise of the former GM’s style as opposed to the BVW bluster and bravado.  Often Alderson’s moves caught people by surprise.  Negotiations are something that probably should be conducted more discreetly than played out over the Internet as was done and continues to be done by the new sheriff in town. 

Now there is a flip side to BVW’s approach – it is the media leak strategy that can be used to put pressure on other trading partners and would-be FA signees that there is multitasking going on in Metsville, not the singular and sequential methodology of the past.  BVW acolytes would be probably volunteer that he’s setting up not only Plan A, but Plans B, C,  D, E and F in the event things don’t transpire as desired. 

What is refreshing is that the magnitude of rumors includes improvements to centerfield, catcher, bullpen, starting rotation (sorry, Jason!), and overall depth.  This list during the Alderson era would more likely include shopping for scrap heap scratch and dent sale items, AAAA players for depth and unproven suspects in the bullpen.  The very fact there is some ink generated about the likes of Marwin Gonzalez, Josh Harrison and the word “Mets” in the same paragraphs suggests that the days of Eric Campbell, Anthony Recker and Andrew Brown are far behind us.

It is also interesting to see that on the subjects of catcher and centerfield there is more than a singular focus.  Free agent options on the former are in the conversation like Yasmani Grandal, Wilson Ramos and Martin Maldonado.  Trade options are also on the table including J.T. Realmuto and one of the surplus in San Diego.

On the centerfield side we’ve heard FA options including A.J. Pollock, Adam Jones, Andrew McCutchen (and dare I whisper it, Bryce Harper).  On the trade front there have not been any substantial rumors but given the magnitude of the other position approaches you’d have to think that deals involving the swapping of players must be in the cards as well.

While Mets fans have been beaten down not to expect the top tier free agents to be in the conversation (Craig Kimbrel, for example), the reinforcements for the bullpen under consideration include the likes of Andrew Miller, David Robertson and others of demonstrable quality instead of the days of Anthony Swarzak, Alex Torres (and his hat), and Josh Smoker. 

As a fan I’m loving the roster construction stories played out in the media on a daily basis.  It gives great fodder for speculation and debate.  However, from a business perspective I have to wonder if the quieter approach might actually be more prudent. 

8 comments:

Viper said...

I am on the camp that when you have money to spend, you try to put your team together that way. The free agents were and are available for the Mets to do this without trading your best prospects.

The only time that I can see you trading your best prospects is when you are that "one" player away from competing for a title. The Mets are not, at least not yet.

But since that seems to be Brodie's way, I will say he needs to continue his commitment to make this team a great team.

Harper? No, he is a below average fielder and yet another LH hitter which the Mets have too many right now. Put him in CF? you would have to be crazy.

Machado? yes please. Right player, right age, right message to the Mets fans.

Robertson, Ottavino, Familia, Miller? yes, sign at least one of them.

Zozo said...

A smart GM is a combination of both. You gotta know when to stay quiet and when to let a few things slip out. It’s just like playing poker, you gotta know when to bluff and when not to.

Tom Brennan said...

He can be loud after he wins this off season.

Mack Ade said...

The first thing BVW had to do in order to be successful in 2019 is to convince the ownership that a $200mil payroll is needed.

It is a fair number based on the new TV revenue plus any increase of merchandise sold with new names on the backs of the jerseys.

You would fill the stands and line them up buying new game shirts with Harper on the back.

Oh...

Did I say... ???

Mike Freire said...

Not sure if it is BVW himself or the echo created by the 300 million media outlets in New York and on the internet? You know, lots of "mouths" to feed, so stories get amplified, etc.

He does seem more brash/confident then Sandy (who had more of the Clint Eastwood vibe going on), but maybe that comes from being an agent?

I think the litmus test will be the current meetings and the lead up to Spring Training. His honeymoon period will be short, as with any NY team.

bgreg98180 said...

If $200 million payroll.....
No reason not to splash into Machado or Harper.

Especially if VanWagenen sees the need to win back the fan interest in NY

Tom Brennan said...

Bob, this reminds me of the movie Draft Day, where the owner tells the GM, "it's time to make a big splash, people love to get wet."

bill metsiac said...

BVW, at least by reputation, has been one of the most successful agents around. And a big part of that job is to be a "convincer". How else would he have been able to get a 10-year deal for Cano that even the mighty Yankees couldn't /wouldn't match?

Whatever his other pros /cons are, his ability to make deals is beyond question.

On another note, there's one name missing on the list of FA utility guys. Why not consider a certain SH who is still able to play 2B,SS, and 3B, and has proven that he can play in NY?

I don't know if he's interested in a utility job, since he's still in his early 30s, but if he is I'd give serious consideration to bringing back Senor Cabrera.