2/4/19

Mack - New Weekly Report





Good morning.


Here’s week three…

          There was a superb article on The New York Post , written by Anthony Barstow, regarding the long term free-agency contract and how they just might be dead. Houston Astros’ owner, Jim Crane, said that the numbers don’t support the kind of lengthy deals superstars are looking for.

Is this a sign of the future? Is it a safer version of collusion? My thoughts are it’s a little of each.

Analytic gurus can make the case that the last 25% of a long-term contract to a free agent usually don’t produce anywhere the numbers this player turned out early in his career. And, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to add to this the injury factor (cough Yoenis Cespedes cough) that adds more insult to (sic) injury.

Read the short article so you are up to speed if our two super free agent studs out there are left at the gate come opening day.

Me?  If I was their agent, I would talk these relatively young free agents to sign a three year, $40mil/yr. deal, with a 4th year team option. There will still be plenty of money still out there when this contract runs out and $160mil should be enough to buy them enough chewing gum in their late 20s.


          Every team makes an Anthony Swarzak acquisition. You know, one of those signings you do because it doesn’t seem like any of your telephone calls are being returned. I pray that the ten million bucks shelled out to Justin Wilson doesn’t turn out to be a repeat of the Swarzak fiasco. Will we be happy with a repeat of his 2018 Cubs stats of 3.46/1.42 in 54.2-IP, along with 69-Ks? I guess, if this represented the worst numbers in the 2019 pen.

I’m being told there is a plan here.

You see, Mets pitching coach Dave Eiland feels he’s seen something in Wilson’s delivery that can be adjusted and lower his BB/9 numbers, while keeping the strikeouts coming.

Yeah, I know. How many times have we’ve been taken down that one-way road?

Well, this is supposedly the plan.

Me? A lefty throwing 96?  Just give me an inning an outing with reduced walks and we may have something here.



None of us were very surprised when the Mets cut fish with ex-first round pick Gavin Cecchini, though most Mets blogger out there are quick to criticize the people in the Mets organization that make picks like this.
Are the Mets doing something worst than the other teams out there?
Well, let’s look at a five year period of 2009-2013. If you were drafted in the first round during one of these years, you should be playing MAJOR league baseball right now.

So what did I find?

2009:     14 out of the 48 first round picks never made it to the majors
2010:          18 of the 50 first rounders haven’t made it there
2011:          20 of the 60 first rounders haven’t yet made it there
2012:          21 of the 60 first rounders haven’t yet made it there
2013:          13 0f the 39 first rounders haven’t yet made it there

In total… 86 out of the 257 first round draft picks never played an inning in the majors.

That’s 33.5% 

Any questions?


One of our readers, Mets Monkey, had a request this week:

Hey Mack, don't know if you've done this or if you take requests, but can you write about what you personally observe empirically or viscerally about a minor league prospect, that is not covered in that 40/70 stuff? When did you ever know for sure, even if that surety is not a consistent prognosticator overall and everyday, but more of a "transcendental" one-time only appraisal? ThanX

We first have to spend sometime figuring out what the hell the Monkey is saying, since he does speak a different language than the rest of us.
I think I have two examples here that fit (both of which I have talked about in the past so excuse me for being redundant… redundant… that’s a Mets Monkey word…)

Both happened at different times during pre-game practice at a Savannah Sand Gnats game.

The first was about an infielder that played parts of four, I repeat, four seasons in Savannah. He really couldn’t find a place to fit into this team until the day he strolled out to right field after he took his turns at the infield practice and started to shoot the shite with a team buddy in right field. Well, manager Tim Teufel started hitting fungos out to the outfielders and calling out where they should throw after he hit the ball in the air. For the hell of it, he got under a ball that Teufel wanted thrown  across the field to third. He did. On the fly. Teufel sort of was stopped in his track, stared out to make sure he recognized the player, and hit another one, yelling ‘same base’. The infielder repeated the throw to third. On fly. So was born the outfielder… Juan Lagares.

The other happened while I was interviewing Pitching Coach Frank Viola on the field. The story was going to be his quick analysis of his pitching squad that year when, I’m not sure who we were talking about, someone walked by after arriving late ‘off the bus’ with the media guy. Viola than smiled and said ‘wait until you see this arm’. I asked where he pitched the previous year and he said he didn’t.

Well, the media guy brought him over to the home bullpen mound down first base and he stepped in immediately. None of the other Mets pitchers around the mound obviously didn’t know him and he started warming up with catcher Camden Maron. He waved his glove to tell Camden he was ready and threw his first pitch down the pipe at around 94… the pop in Maron’s glove could be heard in St. Augustine, all the other pitchers on the team started to head in that direction to check out what was going on, and the legend of Jacob deGrom was born. 

19 comments:

Rustyjr said...

Not much to report eh

Mack Ade said...

My bad.

Tom Brennan said...

Owners having 2nd thoughts about very long deals is understandable. So often, it blows up. Any Mets fan paying attention can see that.

The sound of the ball hitting the glove from deGrom is similar to the explosive sound coming off Alonso's bat. His trick will be to understand he has so much power, he should look to make hard contact, and not to hit 500 footers every time up.

Lagares could still be that guy if he comes in fit and trim, and avoids stupid hyper-acrobatic moves when unnecessary. He need to have that "live to fight another day" attitude. Being he will be a free agent soon, that may become a lot more clear to him in 2019.

Wilson has one big advantage in 2019. Home games in hard-to-hit-in Citifield. Tougher than Wrigley. Cut the walks? All the better.

Swarz-WHO??

Tom Brennan said...

That first rounder analysis would be even more interesting if confined to the top 15 picks in the first round - I bet their "make the majors" rate is much higher.

That said, your posted numbers indicate what a crap shoot the draft is, even in the first round.

Mack Ade said...

Tom -

Couldn't get the engine started this morning.

Then I turn to my Twitter account and have been notified that my WIFE UNFRIENDED ME.

I'm telling ya... I don't get no respect...

Tom Brennan said...

I will bet you finishing in the top let's say 8 picks in the draft, the make the majors rate goes up to 90% +, and the percentage of "impact players" is above 50%.

So, if you are a bad team, TANK!

bill metsiac said...

Good points, but Cecchini is still ours. After clearing waivers,he was outrighted to 'Cuse. He may yet have a future here.

Tom Brennan said...

Mack, da wife can't unfriend you, since u were a high first round pick. A long time ago, just for full disclosure.

Tom Brennan said...

Cecchini will continue to get time in the system, but he will have to really earn it now. The old philosophy of second rate back ups is gone - he needs to be first rate.

Viper said...

Rusty, baseball season is coming up so more interesting things to talk about will come.

While watching the super bowl, it remind it me of the Mets and their unability to score. What a boring game.

Any chance that Frazier gets traded if he hits well in spring training and a team comes calling?

Will d'arnaud stay healthy sitting on the bench or hurt his behind and go on the disable list.

Okay, I will admit it. I will miss seeing Flores.

Mike Freire said...

Second generation contracts are usually a poor investment.....if everyone starts to recognize that fact and they make a financial decision as a result (avoid them), I suppose it COULD be collusion on some level. Or, it is simply a sound business decision.....should be interesting as most "issues" nowadays are affected by which way the media falls on the issue.

I am sure it will be a huge stumbling block for the next labor negotiation.

Good point on the percentage of players that get picked, but never make it. There is still an element of "educated guessing" that goes on, despite better statistics. I guess it is harder to measure things like heart, or character or even the willingness to work your arse off, I guess.

Oh and cool stories on Lagares and DeGrom, Mack.

bill metsiac said...

What is a "second generation contract"?

Met Monkey said...

I generally use "nimiety" in lieu of "redundancy." Nevertheless and notwithstanding, "Eek-eek!" Can your next color piece be about how the sinister barathrum of minor league ball, bad coaching, hurt a prospect? In other words, (wink-wink emoticon) um, when has poor advice and mishandling just single-handedly gourmandized a great prospect til' he was veritable shoe crapola?

Mack Ade said...

Sure

Mike Freire said...

A "second generation" contract is just another way of identifying a big payday once a player hits free agency. It is used more in the NFL, but it applies to MLB, too.

It is quite a journey from draft pick to minor league player to major league player (service time, arbitration, etc).....most players finally get to free agency in the mid to late 20's, so the "big" deal is a second generation contract.

Most of those deals "break even" at best.....but more then likely, you are paying for what a player did prior to the deal, as much as you are for what they might do once they cash in.

Just one perspective, of course......but it is easier to find deals that didn't work out, IMO.

Tom Brennan said...

Viper, that is why I want fences in a little further in 2020,...more scoring at home, where the Mets hit so poorly...a curved CF moved in to 400 or 402...dump the pen dip in right...curve the foul line areas in several feet more. It will make Citifield more average, not a band box...and we will see the last of the Mets scoring 402 runs in the road and 274 at home. It will be an ADVANTAGE to a pitcher like Jake, who will get 20% more home offense but is good enough to only allow 5-10% more. Would be nice to see our ave win 20, not 10. Won only one more game at home than on the road in 7 years...win a lot more at home, more EXCITED fans will show up. If I were Brodie, I do the fences as soon as he can. And WIN. MORE.

Eddie from Corona said...

Mack
I wish I got to this article yesterday
But there are what 30 team that means 30 first rounders
This sandwich picks and other things MLB has classified as as a First rounder is plain dumb
Your analysis should only include the top 30 picks

Also flawed in the analysis is the dam slotting system
Actually having to save money to sign players later
The whole draft system is broken
Teams getting extra picks for small markets but there is revenue sharing so that should be moot
Bottom line is the Mets in the 1st round should hit on 6 out of 10 picks every decade
And most should be allstar level not mlb replacement players
That’s what the rest of the draft is for

Mack Ade said...

Eddie

No problem...

Any time is a good time to tear down one of my analysis'.

Eddie from Corona said...

Sorry Mack not intended on a tear down of you
The league views picks outside the top 30 as first rounder and that’s just dumb

Sorry if it looked like I was tearing down your analysis
It was more like I would like to see the analysis with just top 30