In yesterday's post I noted that the lack of any real indication of how Steve Cohen might choose to do with the Mets allows all of us to project our own hopes onto the guy. Frankly, I'm just happy to have hopes again when it comes to the Mets. I was really disheartened in February when Cohen's initial attempt to purchase the team fell apart. The fact that 18 years of Wilpon sole ownership has translated into only 3 trips to the playoffs, one of them a wild card game loss, made feeling hope about the future of the Mets seem pretty foolish. Steve Cohen can run this team like an absolute dunce and I'd still be grateful that, after years without it, I enjoyed a few months of hope before that became apparent.
Back to our current discussion, the very unpredictability of what actions Cohen might take once MLB owners give him their approval also lends itself to pundits being able to write any story they want about the man and how things might go with him signing the checks. Tyler Kepner of the New York Times has the latest entry in the hey Mets fans, let me rain on your parade genre. The title, "Can Steven Cohen’s Billions Solve the Mets’ Problems? Not So Fast", was both good click bait and a reasonable summary of what was in the article. I don't fault Kepner for writing it, but I do question why fans weren't given a couple of days to celebrate the end of the Wilpon era before Kepner felt the need to harsh our buzz with a dose of bitter medicine.
Kepner makes a fairly obvious point (and one that Mets fans are reminded of constantly) that running the Mets carries a burden of having the same expectations as the Yankees with lower revenues. He also uses Arte Moreno, the owner of the Angels, another #2 team in a large market, as a cautionary tale against the idea that just spending money can make a team a playoff contender. And it's very true, Moreno has made some dubious free agent signings. He seems more intent in getting some big names in his team's uniform rather than doing what it takes to field a well-balanced team.
I've never personally met any billionaires or even multimillionaires. We just don't seem to run in the same circles. But I've known a few guys that managed to make themselves fairly wealthy. Some of them were really smart and impressive mentally, and some of them make you wonder how they ever succeeded. The lesson to me was that you don't have to be very intelligent or even possess a great deal of common sense in order to do very well for yourself. You have to be quite driven to succeed and then have some luck. You might have some talent in one area that absolutely doesn't translate into another, like, say - baseball.
In the case of Steve Cohen, I just don't think you could have that level of success in the financial markets without being really, really smart. Now does that mean Cohen will avoid the Arte Moreno example of making a splash over building a winner? We really can't know that until we've seen what he chooses to do once he gains control of the team. On the other hand, we already know that the Mets under Wilpon management neither spent nor did all of the little things required to build a strong organization. We're seeing the final results of their stewardship play out as we watch another Mets season circle the drain. So, while I'm not at all certain what sort of owner Steve Cohen might be, I'm pretty darned sure that he will be an improvement over what we have right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment