By Mike Steffanos November 19, 2020
When someone is caught cheating, it's rarely a one-off type of thing, even if it's the first time they were ever caught. Cheating, particularly the use of PEDs, is a long-term strategy for those who can convince themselves that the rules don't apply to them. It's why I've literally laughed in the face of folks who were apologists for Roger Clemens' partner in crime Andy Pettitte. It's why I had a teeny bit of hope that some other team might be tempted to take Robby Cano if the Mets swallowed some of the money, so that he could be another team's problem. Yeah, I know that's not going to happen now.
I'm not going to miss Robinson Cano while he's gone — which I hope is permanently — and that feels a little weird to me. I almost always find myself taking at least some rooting interest in a player who dons a Mets uniform. I couldn't help but root for the late Jose Lima, even as I found myself horrified watching him pitch with an arsenal that would have earned him a quick shower in a Little League game. Robbie Cano, however, felt like the bad dates I went on back in the day. Even when they weren't complete disasters, I found myself looking forward to them being over. I've similarly looked forward to Cano being an ex-Met from the moment he put the uniform on.
I can't say that I took no enjoyment from his success in 2020. He had a really good season. I even appreciated how well he seemed to take being moved down in the lineup when he was struggling, and being pulled for defensive purposes late in games. By all accounts he was a good teammate this season.
In any normal situation, a guy coming back from a really bad year is a feel-good story, but not so much when that guy is 37 and already has one suspension for using a drug typically taken to mask PED use. Although it feels a little wrong to suspect someone without evidence, the idea of someone enjoying a 50 point increase in their OPS+ at 37 is quite a stretch. The only time that I can remember players playing at a high level into their late 30s and beyond was the period between when PED use became common in the 90s and when MLB started testing for them in the mid 2000s.
I'm almost tired of dumping on Brodie Van Wagenen, who I'm sure is a decent guy if you get the chance to know him, but I can't help but look back in sad wonder at the sheer hubris that led him to ignore all of the warning signs that argued against bringing Cano to New York. Betting on a 36 year old middle infielder with an 80 game suspension under his belt and a slew of data that argued against his next 5 years being productive is a silly move that few would have taken. But this man, who had been a top sport agent and had graduated from Stanford University, convinced himself that he knew better, causing him to make a move that will go down in infamy as one of the worst of all time.
Still, Van Wagenen didn't make this move in a vacuum. The idiot son of the penurious owner, who had put the kibosh on better, smarter moves aplenty over the years, nodded his head and said, "okay, let's do it!" The brain trust of baseball people that surrounded Brodie in the front office didn't talk him out of this trade. Why would even a single one of them agree with this move, even if Cano cost nothing more than money, much less 2 top prospects? There's a reason so many pink slips were handed out on Steve Cohen's first day. There was honestly a better argument for trading Scott Kazmir for Victor Zambrano back in the day — not a good argument mind you, but a better one.
I needed to get those thoughts out of my system one more time, but the really important questions surround what happens next. In the short term, the $20 million not being paid to Cano this season will be much better spent somewhere else. My hope is that Jeff McNeil will be told, second base is all yours now, kid. Really, no matter who plays there, the Mets defense is likely to be improved just by subtracting Cano. My personal hopes for the money would be a really good starter, a quality defensive catcher and George Springer, but the possibilities abound.
Continue reading by clicking here.
4 comments:
According to reports, MLB didn't really test this past season, just looked at some past users.
MLB does not want to "catch" all the players who use some form of performance enhancing drugs. They just want to keep a lid on it, deter as much as possible, the extreme cases. And there's also a lot of ways to game the tests.
I will forever believe that Jeter used late in his career. Note the turn-around. But think about it: MLB would only shoot itself in the foot if they caught all these so-called "cheaters." It's not a moral high ground that I personally take.
Jimmy
Great minds think alike. Last night I wrote an evaluation of Brodie Van Wagenen who was not quite as bad as most would say. It's running tomorrow morning.
OK, maybe "one on PEDs, always on PED's" in which case the Fool Me Twice sign gets pinned on BVW.
But the trade itself that everybody rents cloth over? idk. I think of it as two.
1. Kelenic & Dunn for Diaz. Unless you foresaw Diaz's implosion (I didn't) at was the kind of "now" trade smart people make. Diaz sucked, so the trade sucked. OK
2. Bruce & Swartek for Cano. Salary dump trade with the Mets taking the bigger burden in years. A minus, but not awful. Where was Bruce going to play... you knew Cespedes was going to be eaten by hogs or something? Cano's range covers a phonebooth or two, but his hands are good and, in case you weren't watching. he turns the DP as well as anybody. NcNeil at the time was penciled in for 3B (or maybe a switch with Cano).
3. Bautista a throw-in on either 1 or 2 makes it a little uglier. That must be what all the gnashing of teeth is all abouy...Batista?
The Mets won 70 and 77 games in 2017 and 2018, Sandy's 6th and 7th seasons running the team and predicating everything on the unfulfilled promise of "sustained success."
The owners fired him and hired Brodie with a "win now" directive. In order to upgrade roster, without a lot of money to spend, Brodie made some short-term trades using prospects.
The won 86 games in 2019. Diaz was awful and so was Cano and so was Noah. If Diaz was good, they make the playoffs. It was a very entertaining, enjoyable season. I liked it.
The Covid year was brutal. Noah out, Strohman out, Matz useless: the team could never overcome those obstacles. It's common for us to say that we won't judge players by their Covid-Year numbers. Why is that not true for the GM, too?
But based on that, something less than 1 1/2 seasons, Brodie is somehow the all-time worst GM in Mets history. The fans hate him, the bloggers tend to be brutally unfair (IMO).
His big crime: He tried to win. Nobody will ever accuse Sandy of that.
Okay, whatever. You can't ignore context. The owners. And the fact that he took over a team that was a mess, with the worst bullpen in MLB.
Jimmy
Post a Comment