There is a weird vibe with this year's New York Mets. They have some very talented guys, but that talent doesn't seem to rise to the top in a synchronized fashion. One gets hot, the others not, and they limp from one series to the next doing just enough to win some of them. Heroism or bust. This is not a championship formula.
Sure, we have all acknowledged that there are some holes in the roster that hopefully will be filled with some wonderful trade deadline deal. But there are areas that are not considered holes that are still underperforming to expectations.
After an all-star week rest, the team returned to the field looking like anything but a rested bunch of pros anxious to get started with the second half. Instead we saw sloppy defense, a lack of timely hitting, and relief appearances that gave us anything but relief. What gives?
The word outside the clubhouse is that the team likes the manager, the manager likes his players, and everyone gets along really well. On the surface, one would say that there is no dynamic that is distracting the players from focusing on their game. Yet the results seem to point to more than just coincidental failure. Since the end of April, the Mets are barely playing .500 ball with 35 wins and 34 losses. Some of those wins have come in spite of themselves, when the opponent does not take advantage of first pitch walks, runners left in scoring position, or defensive lapses.
So what is the matter with this group? They are all trying to do well, grinding through the hot summer in the middle of a long season. It almost seems like they are waiting for a spark to ignite them without knowing they are under water.
Something needs to shake this up. With the trade deadline approaching and everyone talking about the top available players that David Stearns should go get, I am left wondering whether that will help. Even though the team is not in a position where they would become sellers, they may need to do something completely different to raise the level of urgency.
We got the best player in baseball (arguably) this season but the team is not any better. Would some mid-season acquisition of a mid-30's veteran really make a difference now? I think not. It will take something more dramatic, something that rocks the core of the team to break them out of these doldrums. They seem to feel like they will be okay if they just run out there and play hard everyday, but I think they need to run out there like their professional careers are on the line.
If you look at the current roster statistically and draw a line at a .250 batting average, there is a very interesting group below that line. It's all the Baby Mets. The first generation prospects everyone was so excited about that has been brought along slowly, patiently, with trips back and forth to the minors to refine their skills. But they are not pre-ordained to become the core of the new Mets - they are just guys that showed promise coming up that are being evaluated and adjusted.
Now I am not saying that this is the best course of action because I don't give up on players that quickly and I am not a panic seller. What I am saying is that lacking some dramatic move in the near future, I fear that the Mets are sinking into mediocrity. Nothing cries "URGENCY" like seeing your team raise the bar of expectations by ejecting some good players under the bar. Good is nice, but we need great!
You could also toss out a few aging veterans, but I don't think the message gets across as well. It is too easy to rationalize that they are older, skills are declining, and the team really is pushing a youth movement instead of pushing a performance ultimatum.
So if our bathwater is lukewarm, toss it out - with the babies in it. Maybe it will be replaced with a new fountain of youth. It is a pretty bold idea, but so is winning a championship for the first time in 39 years.
15 comments:
Me?
Alvarez has highest trade value
Baty next
Acuna next
Mauricio next
Paul, I'm right there with you. Unfortunately, what are we going to get in return? You can't just give them away. I would be exploring any trade possible at this point.
Mack, you forgot Vientos. or he sunk so low in your eyes that he no longer has any value. I also agree about Alverez, I think we could get somebody pretty good for him.
I've been saying this on and off for quite some time now, but I really would like to see us do a reset this year. Clear the decks of all the shite at the end of the year. Hopefully, we resign Pete and move forward with the 4 core players and build it the right way.
McNeil is probably untradable, so you only have 1 year left.
You still have 3 or 4 solid starters next year, so you can start bringing in the young pitchers. Would love to see them build that way.
The Metsare extremely weak at catcher without Alvarez. You call him up, not trade him. Zero RBI Senger gets sent down. He’s been paid a lot this year for zero RBIs. I’d trade Vientos. Might I regret it? Maybe. Ditto for Mauricio, but I’d prefer to keep him for the rest of the season.
Trading Alvarez would be quite foolish. He's a 23 year old catcher with a great future. Check out Cal Raleigh's stats at that age.
JoeP, Vientos has a lot less value than last year, but did accomplish last year. He has to have some trade value. I however think he is Kelenic II. I’d consider calling up Benge very soon. Why? Hitting .345 in AA, and not fanning much. Will they do that? No. I do want him as my starting RF in 2026.
JoeP, Vientos has a lot less value than last year, but did accomplish last year. He has to have some trade value. I however think he is Kelenic II.
Is Jett better than Tyrone Taylor right now? A case could be made.
I didn't forget Vientos
IMO no trade value
Again
You can not promote AA to MLB
Mack, you know who got promoted to the majors with no AAA, and just 31 AA at bats? Juan Soto.
Pitchers? Spencer Strider had one inning in AAA.
So, it can happen, although the Mets won’t. Because…they are the Mets.
I didn't actually say to trade Alverez. I said he had the highest trade value. Would I trade him as part of a package for a budding superstar or stud pitcher...in a heart beat.
I also didn't necessarily say I would trade any of the youngins just to give them away. I would explore, and trade anyone of them if it improves the team.
Mack, thanks for the clarification, I thought that's what you meant.
Yeah
Counted on one hand
All good comments, and you seem to resonate with this theme. Alvarez does seem to have the highest value, and I can see him excelling at the MLB level once he accepts what he can do instead of trying to do more. Some would call that "maturing", but I think that term is over used. His regressions always seem to come from trying to push his envelope and then not finding the way to get back.
There does appear that something is wrong with this team. They ,for the most part,seem to lack fire and drive. There are to many quiet innings with three up and three quietly going down. Occasionally someone will show some emotion or frustration with an at bat ending in failure. But to often they just jog down toward1st base and quietly head for the dugout. I sometimes wonder if they are dividing into factions within the club house. I hope thats not what is happening because that will destroy a team in a hurry. Maybe they do need a good shake-up just to show the players and fans that this uninspired type of play will not be tolerated.
If we don't fix the hitting with RISP the malaise will continue but how exactly do we do that? Also if their not planning on resigning Pete then they should just clean house. Were a below .500 team w/o him.
Post a Comment