I go by the RVH handle at this site and have enjoyed the daily interactions over the past couple of years. SI boy, Mets fan over 55 years living in Chicago these days.
This is my initial attempt at a Mack’s Mets posting. I am building off Mack’s last Sunday post where JulesC commented on Francisco Alavarez’s swing mechanics. My goal here is to try to get a better understanding of how hitting lab analytics may be starting to catch up to pitching lab gains and the potential for our Baby Mets. If this content is interesting to the group, I can expand to the other Mets hitters throughout the system.
I have sourced concepts from various places and cobbled together a framework that attempts to decompose hitter swing mechanics. Let me know what you all think!
Swing Mechanics Decomposition — Concept Overview
A player’s swing can be understood through a Force-to-Flow continuum that blends biomechanics, sequencing, and cognitive approach. This framework breaks down how efficiently a hitter generates, transfers, and applies energy — from the ground up — to create power, control, and adaptability.
Force reflects raw athletic power, torque generation, and intent to drive the ball.
Flow represents sequencing efficiency, rhythm, posture control, and adjustability through the swing.
Temporal Control measures how long a hitter can delay commitment — the essence of pitch recognition and decision-making.
Cognitive Discipline describes approach maturity: how intent, recognition, and plan execution align with mechanics.
By analyzing these dimensions — kinetic sequencing, lower-body engagement, posture stability, hand path, contact plane, and approach intelligence — we can classify hitters along developmental stages:
Raw Force: Effort-driven, sequencing underdeveloped.
Emerging Flow: Mechanically improving, timing variable.
Optimized Force: Efficient power through rhythm and structure.
Controlled Flow: Precision through posture, patience, and timing.
Biomechanical Mastery: Seamless motion, cognitive control, and adaptive intelligence.
This decomposition provides a consistent lens for evaluating any hitter — from prospects learning sequencing fundamentals to elite players optimizing timing, rhythm, and decision efficiency.
Francisco Álvarez — Mechanical and Developmental Analysis
1. Sequencing Breakdown
The critique correctly identifies a top-down kinetic chain rather than a ground-up sequence.
Efficient swings begin with:
Ground force creation and torque through the rear leg.
Pelvic rotation that transfers energy up the kinetic chain.
Delayed but connected torso, shoulder, and hand release (“scap load” into “slot”).
Álvarez appears to initiate from the shoulders and arms, skipping energy transfer from the lower half — a classic “disconnector.”
➤ Result: Power effort without efficiency — visually violent, but low bat-speed efficiency scores (energy lost before impact).
2. Consequences of Upper-Body Dominance
Bat-speed decay: since lower-body contribution is minimal, he must compensate through muscular effort, which is unsustainable and variable.
Plate coverage limitations: when upper-body dominant, the swing plane locks early — making him vulnerable to:
Offspeed pitches down/away (no barrel adjustability).
High-velocity inside fastballs (late sequence prevents tight turns).
Predictable attack pattern: pitchers exploit the down-and-away hole and expand vertically once behind in the count.
3. Developmental Implication
The note about “pre-Cohen era” Mets instruction hits a real developmental critique: the organization historically lagged behind in biomechanics and individualized swing patterning.
Recent investment in high-speed motion capture and swing labs (St. Lucie, Binghamton) aims to correct that.
Álvarez’s problem is not effort but sequencing re-education: retraining how his pelvis, torso, and hands fire in time.
4. Corrective Pathway
Kinetic chain drills: step-back & coil, medicine-ball hip rotation, and “pelvis-lead sequencing” under constraint.
Visual load re-programming: open-to-closed stride variations to teach ground force timing.
Data confirmation: look for increases in Attack Angle stability and Connection Score (Blast metrics) before bat-speed targets.
5. Summary Diagnosis
Álvarez is an explosive athlete with inefficient sequencing.Current power output = brute force, not flow.
Needs kinetic re-patterning, not harder swings.

20 comments:
RVH: Very interesting. I knew none of this level of swing analysis.
Now….will Alvarez buy in and give it a real try this off season, once his hands heal up. My guess is yes, since he already has revamped in the past, showing his willingness.
I would show him videos of a guy whose swing doesn’t decompose (Judge? Raleigh?) alongside his swing, and try to convince him he too could hit 50+ with a revamped swing.
First, welcome
Who discovered you, son?
As for Alvy, we can talk about this guy til our lips fall off but he's not going to be a consistent major league hitter until he matures, stops doing things his way, stops changing it every moon cycle, and listens to a mentor
Alvarez seemed to get somewhat better after the trip to AAA but he hurt both his hands. He was so out of whack before he literally had no power. He had much more power there and when he came back. He is still a very young man so hopefully he can mature into a tru middle of the lineup bat. Time will tell. The thing about all the advanced analytics is that the athlete still needs to apply the learnings & execute. That will always be on the athlete & is extremely hard to do.
Mack, thanks again for the opportunity to post
Are you on X?
It's an honor to host you
Get a room you two.
Thanks, RVH for the post.
As far as Alverez goes everyone knows I'm not his biggest fan. While his potential is undeniable, but at some point, this has to translate in success.
Some players just don't have it between the ears. While it looked like he greatly improved when he returned from the minors, he quickly reverted back to the same wild undisciplined hitter he was. Swinging at pitches way out of the strike zone. Swinging with all his might like a crazy man. At some point potential doesn't mean anything.
Joe
I'm not sure if you like Christmas
Oh My God! Is there a test on this? Seriously though, congratulations on your initial writing foray.
Alvarez has shown the willingness and desire to out in the work to be successful. I never bet against such individuals…
Mack, I Love the Mets. I just don't like guys who put themselves first. Who hurt the team with either lack of hustle, those who are unwilling to learn to better themselves or put themselves before the team.
As you can see, I don't suffer fools lightly.
RVH, Just an excellent, excellent post on swing mechanics and how Alvy is top heavy in his swing causing very inconsistent contact and power. I hope that your swing mechanics are taken into account (especially by Alvy) because they make so much sense!
We really have been drafting better on this site Gus
I don't attribute this to lack of WANTING to learn.
He just currently seems to be too immature and wants to do it himself
But
Long leash here because if high raw talent
I did send this privately to Steve Cohen for his perusal
Good comment Mack, I definitely see your point.
Yes but dormant. What should I look for?
Thanks for the feedback! I’ve got additional cuts on all of the baby Mets. Plus Soto, Lindor, Alonso, & Nimmo coming up.
Hi --- This is Jules C upon whom RVH's excellent piece builds. I come from a family lineage of baseball players at all levels, but though I played baseball at various levels, most of my experience comes from golf, where I had a decent amateur career as a golfer until my mid 40s when I suffered an injury that limited my ability to perform at a competitive level, though since semi-retiring from an academic career,I have become a golf coach focusing my teaching on underprivileged kids and young adults and wounded veterans gratis.
RVH's article is very well done and I am glad that it has apparently reached many more individuals than my initial comments have.
I would welcome the opportunity to join forces with him in discussing the swing mechanics of various players.
In general, the main reason you want to develop good mechanics should be obvious. A swing recruits energy from various sources, most important of which is the ground. Energy is also independently generated by certain movements in the swing, etc. But the key is having a swing that efficiently transfers the energy that has been recruited to the bat. Much, but not all of this depends on the kinetic sequence. Some of it depends on other things including fast twitch muscles and more importantly, various braking mechanisms in the swing-- all of which are worth discussing in detail and can be made understandable to anyone.
I focused on Alvarez because his sequencing is so obviously bad and his swing, as a result, is the paradigm of enormous inefficient effort. And I also focused on his swing to illustrate a feature important in the development of players who are drafted as teenagers whose skill levels overwhelm the competition at that stage in their development. I have seen in this in golf as well as baseball. I struck out lots of batters in Little League because I had been pitching to my Dad who was a catcher since the age of 6 and developed a curveball by the age of 10. By the time I was 18, I was no better than I was at 13. I only developed really good mechanics in baseball when it was too late to be any use. I had better instruction in golf :-), but in both, sadly, my talents were relatively limited.
Take a look at both Mauricio and Alvarez. They dominated based on talent and have struggled since the competition has gotten better. You want young kids to do what they do naturally, but at a certain point, when it is part of a genuine career path, you have to take a step back and develop fundamentals of efficient body movement.
Failure to do so is disastrous for the following obvious reason. The level of performance is so high overall at the professional level, any weakness is exposed, any inefficiency magnified. Lose a half mile of bat speed and you are different hitter -- and a less successful one. The more you rely on force, the more likely is the decline (which need only be very small) to accelerate.
The same is true of pitchers. I'll make only comment on this here, and more if there is an interest in my doing so. Look at the pitchers who have thrown hard for long periods of time. They are not built like Pedro Martinez. Here are a few names: Seaver, Ryan, Cleamons. What they share is incredibly good use of recruiting energy from the ground and they have had strong upper legs, employed their pelvic region incredibly and had incredibly efficient kinetic sequencing. Got a lot from the ground and passed it on efficiently. Strong base: great interaction with the ground; and a great relationship between their hands/fingers and the ball (think golf grip, and golfers with great hands: those hands are all about impact on finesse shots and ability to control the clubface -- good example few will remember, Chi Chi Rodriguez).
That's more than enough for now. Thanks RVH for calling attention to my comments, and thanks even more for an excellent and accessible article.
Couple of follow-up comments. Alvarez's mechanics did not improve post AAA. His patience did -- briefly. You have to look at your hitters and ask: what pitches do they hit, at what rate; and with what impact. Vientos, Alvarez hit a disproportionate percentage of pitcher mistakes. If I were a pitcher, I would only show Vientos fastballs, but never intend to get him out with one. Alvarez has all sorts of problems. Surprisingly, for a catcher, he is not good at pitch recognition. Second, he rarely seems to have a plan. Third, and this is very surprising, he is not good at anticipating what someone is going to throw him at any point in a count; this does him in a lot once he loses patience, which he did late in the season and which he improved on briefly when returning from AAA. His early upper body dominated swing really limits his range of plate coverage.
The only real systematic problem I notice in Baty's swing is its length. No one should expect hitters to hit well against all kinds of pitches or on all planes. Part of their solution to this unavoidable limitation is having a plan built around strength and weaknesses, which means acknowledging weaknesses. Former baseball players who become color announcers tend to describe this appropriately as 'not trying to do too much' with certain pitches or when put in an unfavorable count. I can't begin to express how big a role 'hitting intelligence' plays.
Post a Comment