Early on in my Mets fandom, I had a very rosy way of looking at the Mets at the dawn of a new campaign. Sure, Jerry Koosman had a rough year last season, but he'll return to form this year. Last year's Mets might have looked like an offensively challenged T-ball squad, but I'm positive that all of them will live up to their potential finally, and we'll be the eastern version of the Big Red Machine. It took a few years of deep disappointments and growing out of a hero-worshipping age before I realized that they were already living up to their potential; the problem was that the players just weren't very good.
The period from the mid-70s to the big turnaround in 1984 robbed me of whatever optimism I had still managed to hold onto. I had barely entered puberty when I began to develop the deep cynicism of a life-long Mets fan. There were never enough consecutive seasons of winning to cure me of that darkness, and the team's failure to build something from the 1986 Championship was a bad harbinger of what was to come.
I had a feeling that the 2006 Mets were going to be special, and they were. But I also worried that their lack of pitching depth and their organizational failures to develop viable young pitching might doom them in subsequent seasons. That fear proved to be all too real.
The 2015 Mets rode great young starters, insanely hot streaks from Yoenis Céspedes and Daniel Murphy, and, frankly, more than a bit of luck a step further than that 2006 club was able to go. Ultimately, however, they too came up short. They let Murphy sign with the Nationals on a very affordable 3-year deal. I just had the feeling that the offensively-challenged club was making a big mistake, and it was.
When the Mets hired agent Brodie Van Wagenen to be their new GM, I thought to myself maybe it would take reaching outside of the normal sources for executives to shake the Wilpons out of their long slumber. Sadly, it took all of one deal for Van Wagenen to show us that he was in way over his head.
This brings us to today. While we've seen some positive signs in camp from Pete Alonso, James McCann, Francisco Lindor, Brandon Nimmo, Kevin Pillar, Marcus Stroman, Taijuan Walker, Miguel Castro, and Edwin Díaz, among others, there's no use in pretending that the fairly long absences of Seth Lugo and Carlos Carrasco weren't huge blows before the season even commenced. I don't need to dig too deeply into my Mets-scarred psyche to find a solid level of pessimism over how much this might hurt. I believe there is enough depth to survive these losses, however, which is a reflection of the reality that the Wilpons are no longer running the show.
Now depth will only take you so far. I deeply hope that the run of bad luck so far might at least take a breather for a while. If the Mets are forced into using too much of that depth, it will be a sign that this just might not be their year. It's one thing when your third-string catcher or a middle relief guy goes on the shelf for a bit, quite another when key players start dropping like flies. I pray that won't be so.
Beyond catastrophic injury totals, what I most fear for the Mets in 2021 is something far more insidious. I quote from the Encyclopedia Britannica:
Law of inertia, also called Newton’s first law, postulate in physics that, if a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force.
One thing I always worry about with a team that's been bad for a while is the law of inertia. Once losing becomes part of the culture, it becomes difficult to break free from that. Ask the 1983 and 2005 Mets clubs how difficult it is to break out of a losing tradition. While neither of those was as complete of a team as the 2021 Mets, they both had key pieces in place for what would drive a pennant run the following season. The 1983 Mets lost 94 games, and the 2005 Mets, a better club, just couldn't seem to ever make it very far above .500.
1 comment:
Inertia left along with Wilson Ramos.
I still wonder if they could have retained Ramos as a back up catcher - I think he is getting $2 million from Tigers.
Post a Comment