At great personal restraint I am not seeking to make a
political statement beyond the observation that the United States was a bit laissez faire when it
came to its response to the coronavirus-19 which has plagued various parts of
Asia, Europe and now apparently Australia, too.
Changes have been made as of the 11th of March which some
will say were necessary, others will say overdue and still others will say not
nearly enough. That is NOT the point of
this discourse.
Right now everyone is aware that not one, but two Utah Jazz
players have now tested positive for the virus along with actors Tom Hanks and
his wife Rita Wilson. In the case of the
NBA, they were faced with having to quarantine the Jazz players from contact
with other teams and then faced the prospect of testing the other teams that
have come in contact with the Jazz over the past few weeks. Consequently they took the dramatic but
pragmatic approach to suspending the NBA season until the disease is managed
properly and defeated. While no one
liked the prospect of missing out on the fights for the basketball post-season,
most agreed it was the smart thing to do.
That brings us, of course, to the question of how Rob
Manfred and others are going to face the same questions facing Major League
baseball. Already whole states like
Washington and whole cities like San Francisco have enacted bans on crowds of
over 250 people. With most baseball stadiums handily accommodating crowds of 40,000 or more that would seem to be a problem.
Yesterday the Spring Training operations were shut down in Arizona and Florida. The start of the season was postponed for an optimistic two weeks.
Yesterday the Spring Training operations were shut down in Arizona and Florida. The start of the season was postponed for an optimistic two weeks.
One approach bandied about is moving home openers in the
legislated locations to non-legislated locations so that the season could
begin on time and finish on time with a full schedule. There’s some merit to that approach, of
course. Baseball may be a sport for
entertainment, but it is also a business that generates a lot of money which
would not happen if they simply did not play the games.
Others are advocating that the Major Leagues simply shut
down their prospective late March and early April openings until more is known
about the best way to combat the disease and prevent further spread of the
infection. While that approach would
certainly annoy many fans and disgruntle team owners, there is merit to the old
cliché about an ounce of prevention.
A third approach discussed is to have the games proceed as
scheduled but ban fans from attending in person. That method would preserve the integrity of
the game and its schedule but would not contribute to the gate revenues from
ticket sales (not to mention all of the peripheral dollars lost on parking
fees, refreshments and souvenir purchases).
Furthermore, it would seem somewhat bizarre bordering on fictitious to
play professional sports while simultaneously banning spectators.
No one has gone as far as to suggest screening tests be made
available at stadium entrances to check for the presence of the virus in anyone
planning to attend. After all, there’s a
cost associated with medical tests that no one wants to address. More importantly, the first positive test
would cause widespread panic among the potential attendees.
It’s a situation that the country is not prepared to answer
without full government, business and citizen cooperation. We were indeed a bit late in getting started,
but now we must face the difficult decisions regarding the best approaches to
take.
Being based in a minor league franchise city, the issue is not quite as dramatic for me as it is for the 30 locations where Opening Day is scheduled to commence in the next few weeks. Maybe because I’m a relatively safe distance away it is a bit easier for me to opt on the side of caution and lean towards one of the prevention solutions such as a temporary shutdown, location changes or playing without fans. It doesn’t seem to be worth the risk of fatal infection transmission for which there is not yet a known cure simply to preserve the history of the game.
Being based in a minor league franchise city, the issue is not quite as dramatic for me as it is for the 30 locations where Opening Day is scheduled to commence in the next few weeks. Maybe because I’m a relatively safe distance away it is a bit easier for me to opt on the side of caution and lean towards one of the prevention solutions such as a temporary shutdown, location changes or playing without fans. It doesn’t seem to be worth the risk of fatal infection transmission for which there is not yet a known cure simply to preserve the history of the game.
6 comments:
Honestly. I'm not sure what to make of the corona virus. Many doctors would tell you that the common flu that goes around is ten times more prevalent and also kills about ten times as many people per year. Yet, we've never shut everything down because of the flu. (There is no real cure for the flu, either. Similar to corona virus, the symptoms are treated until the patient recovers...hopefully.)
As much as the people in charge want to "quarantine life as we know it", once people come out and contact each other again (be it April, May, June, whenever), transmission will pick up again.
In case you think that I really WANT to get this, I don't. I wouldn't want to pass it to mother or mother-in-law, who are elderly and might not survive it. But, I also know I am going to come in contact with it at some point, if I haven't already. We all probably will. Just got to hope and pray for the best when we and our families do.
Caution is vital. It seems the biggest concern is not to have an explosion of cases and overwhelm hospitals' ability to deal with it. For instance, projections are that ventilators available are not nearly enough unless the rate of infection is held quite low.
I am an expert and would not want to have to make those decisions. Even with no fans in the stands, players would have to travel and stay in hotels. Seems very hard to imagine some players getting infected. Then what?
One solution might have been for teams to stay in Florida and Arizona and just start the season now. Cancel the rest of spring training and just start. Televise games. No fans. Let them play in hotter climates where density of population is less and presumably transmission is inhibited by heat. But I doubt they'd try that.
Be smart. Stay safe.
Reese -
I am so pissed at so many levels.
I am pissed that major league baseball has come to a dead stop.
I am particularly pissed that the college baseball season was shelved entirely.
And I am extremely pissed about the lack of test kits in the United States.
Let's face it. None of us 30 days ago thought we would be here, but it wouldn't have killed us or the economy to order the test kits when this virus was detected in China (by Chinese).
I don't think we could have stopped the spread but we at least could have the ability to test our populas.
We really missed the boat here.
Yes, better leadership would have meant a huge difference in testing and prevention of the spread of the disease.
Reese -
And I'm not sure where the leadership failed.
The CDC... the WHO... or the administration.
Probably all of them.
Thois could really be a deal breaker during a political year.
Today the resident on Pennsylvania Avenue blamed his predecessor for issues related to the distribution of test kits rather than taking action to fix the problem. Right now I'm much more concerned that people stay healthy or get effective treatment. Later we can deal with flawed leadership.
Post a Comment