It seems as if Mets fans have seen this movie play out
before. Off to a good start, the ballclub
falls into a major tailspin, partially due to assortment of injuries, partially
due to roster mismanagement and partially due to lack of execution by the
players.
There’s nothing the manager can do to address the injuries
except play the hand he is dealt.
However, the GM and owners can pay attention to what’s happening and act
accordingly to address the issues.
One
of our faithful readers here, for example, pointed out that if they really
wanted to demote one of the underperforming outfielders to make room for Carlos
Gomez, they zigged when they could have zagged.
Just as Juan Lagares’ contract makes him virtually untradeable, it’s
entirely likely that had he been the one DFA’d no one would have claimed him (and
be stuck with his full salary). Thus he
could have been outrighted to AAA. Then
they could have reserved the minimum wage Keon Broxton for the next few years.
I’m not crying any tears over their decision
to DFA Broxton but I am puzzled why Carlos Gomez has been sitting on the bench
when they know what little Lagares contributes while Gomez was on fire in
AAA. Wow, does that give you TC flashbacks
or what?
Speaking of managers, people have already begun speculation
on who would be the best man for the job should they decide Mickey Callaway
(Terry II) has worn out his welcome? Getting swept by the lowly Marlins certainly suggests that the end may truly be near since he was not the manager chosen by the current GM.
The obvious choice is bench coach Jim Riggleman, a BVW selection and the man who has experience with the interim managerial role. Furthermore, he’s been there to advise Callaway on what to do and we’ve seen how that’s worked out. He has performed this job with the Reds, the Nationals, the Mariners and the Padres (as well as a stint hired from the beginning with the Cubs). In all that time he’s compiled a shockingly sub-Terry record of 726-904, a winning percentage of just .445. (By comparision, TC was .486 for his Mets career and .495 overall). That would be a colossally stupid move, hence it is the likely one.
The obvious choice is bench coach Jim Riggleman, a BVW selection and the man who has experience with the interim managerial role. Furthermore, he’s been there to advise Callaway on what to do and we’ve seen how that’s worked out. He has performed this job with the Reds, the Nationals, the Mariners and the Padres (as well as a stint hired from the beginning with the Cubs). In all that time he’s compiled a shockingly sub-Terry record of 726-904, a winning percentage of just .445. (By comparision, TC was .486 for his Mets career and .495 overall). That would be a colossally stupid move, hence it is the likely one.
Just a few short years ago when the plug was finally pulled
on the last manager, the usual suspects were lined up and the team caught us by
surprise by going with the fresh-faced (and minimum wage) Mickey Callaway
rather than a more experienced (and more expensive) name of others who had greater
track records. This time BVW has the
opportunity to correct that mistake, but in mid-season only has folks currently
not under contract to consider for the role.
Joe Girardi
The former Marlins and Yankees field general has a WINNING
lifetime record of .988 and .794. He’s
been out of baseball since being relieved of his duties with the Yankees but given
his successful history, he would command more money than the frugal Wilpons
would want to pay. Furthermore, he has
shown enough gravitas and backbone that he may not condone the front office
meddling that’s been well documented.
Buck Showalter
Back in the early 1990s the Yankees took a chance on the
somewhat unknown Showalter and were rewarded with a steady progressing from 4th
to 2nd to two straight divisional titles after which Showalter resigned. He subsequently managed the Diamondbacks,
Rangers and Orioles, but he has not done quite as well, having only finished
first once with the 2014 Orioles.
Overall his record is a .506 winning percentage which puts him in the
plus column, but not by much.
Carlos Beltran
After the Mickey Callaway results they may be reluctant to
go with another unproven name for the managerial job, but Beltran’s borderline
Hall of Fame career, his long stint with the Mets and the thumbing of the nose
towards the Yankees (common with the top three candidates), he is a bit more understandable
than was the current skipper. Although
the Yankees passed on him after interviewing the multi-All Star for their vacant
managerial job, they did extend him an offer as an assistant to the front
office and they likely would not grant permission for him to interview for the
Mets’ theoretical opening.
David Wright
Of course, the Mets do have their own in-house option already on the payroll who the fans would greet with great enthusiasm after having spent his entire career with the organization. David Wright has the respect of everyone, has done some front office work as well, and, more importantly, could be given the job with no additional
out-of-pocket money, relieving him of his make-work job and giving him a real
one. The problem, of courses, beyond the
lack of experience which is partially how they dug themselves into the current
hole, is what it does to his image.
Right now David Wright stands as an icon in Mets history, someone who is
revered by Mets fans the same way Derek Jeter, Mariano Rivera and many other
recent folks are evaluated by fans in the Bronx. Should he take this job and not succeed in
it, then it would greatly tarnish his overall reputation with the fans and all
that goodwill capital he’s built over the years may be spent.
Tony DeFrancesco
The twice-named Manager of the Year in the minor leagues, DeFrancesco
has had limited major league experience as a third base coach with the Oakland
A’s and as a short-term (and unsuccessful) interim manager for the then
National League Houston Astros after they fired Brad Mills. He’s in-house now as the manager of the
Syracuse Mets and should be familiar with some of the players who came up
through his time with Las Vegas and now Syracuse. He is already on the payroll, so he has that
same advantage as David Wright. As a
sacrificial lamb, if he did not succeed, the Mets would not have jeopardized
any PR value by firing him when his time was up. As such, his selection would seem the most
likely in Mets-think to finish out the season should they come to their senses
and realize that the odds of winning with another career loser like Jim
Riggleman would be greeted with disdain.
Who is your first choice to replace Mickey Callaway when the
ax inevitably falls?
13 comments:
They need a coroner as the next manager - the corpse has flatlined.
I heard a quote on the radio from Callaway where he essentially said that he would keep loving on his players. I think it was from yesterday.
What is this, Sesame Street?
Where's Gil when you need him. I'd settle for Billy Martin.
I'm speechless.
Yeah, I was kind of waiting for him to have his Gil moment, walk out to 2B and take the ball from Cano after his second recent lack-of-hustle effort.
First off, Lagares will be paid the full amount of hos contract, whether he is here, released, traded, or outrighted.
That said, I do NOT want a mgr who has been fired by several other teams, especially one who has spent most or all of his time in the AL. I also don't want to turn the reins over in mid-season to someone totally unfamiliar with the current team.
I'd rather give a chance to a fresh face currently with the team. DiFran is one such, as is Luis Rojas. Rojas, like Davey, has been managing in the system since 2011, working his way from Savannah to Bingo with a winning record. As such, he is very familiar with the young players, and they with him. He is well versed in analytics, and has been with the team all season, so he knows the flaws and strengths of the vets as well as the kids. He doesn't bring baggage with him, and the fact that he was added as a "quality control coach" or similar title shows that he has the ear and confidence of upper management. Being Latino doesn't hurt, either. I'd at least put him on a list of finalists for the job.
So by that logic you didn't want Terry either. Glad you've finally seen the light :)
I hate to go all "Premier League Soccer" here (those clubs change managers annually), but it just feels like the team needs a change.
Mickey seems like a nice guy, but the results aren't there. It also seems like the team has tuned him out, so what's left to do? Mickey isn't attached to BVW either, so I think a move is coming.
If you think the roster is capable of better then it is currently producing, you have to change the leadership while there is still time to recover.
OR, if you think the roster is producing exactly what it is capable of, then you need new players.
Personally, I think it is the former.
But who's your choice for replacement, Mike?
BVW is almost certainly going to fire Mickey eventually - sooner rather than later. The thing is, what's the point right now?
Mickey was clearly overmatched in terms of in-game tactics in 2018, so Brodie gave him Jim Riggelman to talk to on the bench. If BVW fires Mickey for tactical incompetence, isn't that Riggelman's fault just as much as Mickey's fault?
Brodie has also given Mickey a roster of position players that includes Todd Frazier, Juan Lagares, Travis d'Arnaud and Keon Broxton. Travis and Keon were released; what are Todd and Juan still doing here? If nothing else, wait until Lowrie comes back and release Frazier. See if Keon clears waivers and if so, bring him back to replace Lagares. If the losing continues, at least all reasonable options were exhausted before sharpening the ax.
Honestly, I don't favor any specific person for the managerial job, at this point. Try Riggleman. What do we have to lose.
A track record worse than Mickey? He is an experienced loser.
Excellent question, Reese......perhaps a veteran that can get the respect from
the players? I heard Girardi is a "pain in the arse" but he does seem to win more then he loses, so maybe give him a shot?
I hear you Reese. Do you think the Mets are "attractive" to prospective managers?
They are about as attractive as cabinet posts are. You know you have no real authority and can here the proclamation, "You're fired!" at any moment..
Post a Comment