Before you
read on, let me say one thing: SIMPLY AMAZIN’
Out of 120
full season minor league teams (4 per major league squad), the Mets’ teams were
ranked based on wins and losses as follows:
Runs
|
|||||||
Rank
|
Team
|
W
|
L
|
Win %
|
League
|
For
|
Against
|
3rd
|
|
85
|
51
|
0.625
|
|
619
|
486
|
13th
|
|
83
|
59
|
0.585
|
|
718
|
585
|
21st
|
|
81
|
63
|
0.563
|
|
880
|
750
|
28th
|
|
76
|
62
|
0.551
|
|
643
|
611
|
16TH
|
AVERAGE
|
81
|
59
|
0.580
|
|
715
|
608
|
- No other organization had 4 teams in the top 28.
- Only the D Backs, Rangers, and (dreaded) Nationals had 3 teams in the top 28.
- Only 18 organizations even had 1 or more teams in the top 28, and (shucks) the Yanks
had none. Zero. Zip. Nada.
The Mets’ 3
rookie ball teams (Brooklyn, Kingsport, and GCL St Lucie) had a combined won-loss
record of 109-95 (a solid .534), which certainly had to be one of the best overall
records of any organization’s combined rookie ball operation. As often is the case, when the Mets win (as
these rookies did) the pitching leads the way:
Brooklyn's outstanding
staff led the NY Penn League in ERA (2.74, well ahead of the 2nd team’s
2.97).
All in all,
for an organization like the Mets, whose minor league system not too many years
ago was widely disparaged, this was some incredible organization-wide
performance in 2014.
How could it
not bode extremely well for the club that plays in Queens?
No comments:
Post a Comment