With the non-waiver trade deadline having passed yesterday,
perhaps it’s a good time to review the rules concerning August trades that can
be made between clubs. Some people
erroneously assume that once the “trading deadline” passes then the rosters are
pretty much set for the end of the year.
However, there is a provision that will allow trades to be completed,
but it’s a little bit more complicated.
MLB allows a club to place a player on revocable (or what
they refer to as “recallable”) waivers for the purposes of testing the market
for player transactions. If, for
example, the Mets placed Jon Niese on this list and the Boston Red Sox put in a
claim for him, the Mets have the right to pull him back off the list and are
not obligated to let Niese move to Boston.
The alternative is within two days to work out a trade with
the Red Sox for players or money going back to the Mets for Jon Niese.
Finally, the Mets could also simply let the Red Sox have
Niese and transfer the responsibility for the current contract to the claiming
team. A good example might be someone
like Andre Ethier of the Dodgers who is earning far more than he is producing. Should a team claim Ethier the Dodgers would
likely relinquish their rights to him to get out from under the salary still
owed to him for the next few years.
If, after the waiver period, no one has claimed the player
in question, the GM is free to trade him to any of the other 29 clubs.
Where it gets a little complicated is you can only play this
game once. Once a team exercises its option
to remove a player from the waiver list, should they later list him again then
the claiming team DOES get to keep that player.
During the month of August it is not uncommon to put nearly
an entire roster’s worth of names on these waivers since you do have the right
of rescission. Placing a player on
waivers helps a GM know if another team is interested in that player and could
lead to trade talks.
Sometimes teams are known to put in waiver claims simply to
block a player from going to a division rival.
For example, if the Cubs put Starlin Castro on waivers the Mets might
claim him not necessarily because they want to take on his contract, but to
prevent the Washington Nationals from getting someone who could be a long term
solution for them at shortstop with Ian Desmond scheduled to hit free agency.
The last wrinkle to consider is post-season
eligibility. A player must be on the 25
man roster (or DL or bereavement or the suspended lists) prior to midnight on
August 31st. Now in the case
of the Mets, their only currently suspended player, Jenrry Mejia, wouldn’t have
qualified anyway due to his first PED suspension. However, suppose a player on the club had a
temper tantrum and destroyed part of the dugout. If the Mets chose to suspend him for 10 days
in late August and it spilled over to September, he would still be eligible for
the post-season.
It’s a little more difficult to consummate deals come
August, but the mechanisms are there to get things done if a GM is so inclined
to improve his roster.
2 comments:
I still like who you and I discussed earlier... Marlon Byrd
I'm thinking the next move will be for a relief pitcher. Even some of the big names who didn't get moved could be in play. A guy like Joaquin Benoit could be a good short term solution, too.
Post a Comment